Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Phillips
- Postcode verified
HA3 9TE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Following my visit to your school on 1 December 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. p.1
- Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. p.1
- The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2014. p.1
- It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. p.1
- Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. p.1
- Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com p.1
- During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders, a small group of Year 9 students, and the Chair and two other members of the Governing Body. p.2
- The purpose of these meetings was to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 986
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Jonathan Miller Headteacher JFS The Mall Kenton Harrow Middlesex HA3 9TE
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to JFS
Following my visit to your school on 1 December 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to JFS
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to JFS
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to JFS
ensure that the new policies and procedures for behaviour management are applied consistently by all members of the teaching staff and in all subjects; it is particularly important that teachers are aware of and observe the new ‘ladder of consequence’ review the range of sanctions used for students when they are sent to ‘Room 17’ or held in detention, making sure that the sanctions are appropriate to the misdemeanour ensure that all observations in lessons give due consideration to the impact of teaching on students’ learning behaviour. Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and other senior leaders, a small group of Year 9 students, and the Chair and two other members of the Governing Body. The purpose of these meetings was to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. A telephone conversation was held with the independent school improvement adviser contracted to support the school by the local authority. The school’s improvement plans relating to the inspection areas for improvement were evaluated. Short visits were made to 11 lessons and I paid a visit to ‘Room 17’ during morning break-time.
p.2
Context
Since the section 5 inspection, a deputy headteacher has retired. The senior leadership team has been restructured. Thirteen new teachers joined the school permanently in September 2014, with a further six teachers covering long-term absences on fixed contracts. Three new members of the governing body took up post in September.
p.2
Main findings
Although the inspection judgement came as a surprise and disappointment to the school community, the Ofsted report was understood and accepted by senior leaders and governors. Together, they have acted professionally and resolutely to start tackling the areas for improvement. Information gathered about patterns of attendance is more detailed, and procedures for monitoring attendance have also improved. Attendance in the sixth form has risen, particularly in Year 12. After careful consultation with staff, parents and students, the school’s behaviour and bullying policies have been revised and combined. The policy is soon to be put before governors for final approval. A key feature of the policy is the ‘ladder of consequences’, which makes expectations crystal clear to staff and students. The ‘ladder’ shows exactly where lines of responsibility lie for dealing with and managing inappropriate behaviour, together with the appropriate sanctions at each level.
p.2
Main findings
These actions by senior managers and governors are all encouraging. However, you acknowledge that one crucial challenge remains; to ensure that these changes are realised consistently across the school before the next inspection. The effective action taken by senior leaders and governors in reshaping school policy now needs to be matched in practice by all teaching staff. My observations in lessons revealed that, while many students show good attitudes to learning, this is not always the case. We discussed the importance of considering evidence from the presentation of work in books and students’ demeanour in lessons when evaluating the quality of teaching. In a small number of cases, attitudes to learning were less than good. Although these students were generally biddable, poor presentation and unfinished work together with lapses in concentration showed that they could do better. Senior leaders have recently refreshed their training in lesson observation; we agreed that
p.2
Main findings
future observations could usefully focus on the impact of teaching on student behaviour and attitudes to learning.
p.3
Main findings
Although you were able to demonstrate a small reduction in the number of referrals to ‘Room 17’, it is clear that there is still some inconsistency in the reasons for referral. Students say that ‘sitting in silence’ or ‘lines’ are commonly used sanctions. In my view, more needs to be done to ensure that the sanctions given to students are appropriate to the misdemeanours committed and age of the students.
p.3
Main findings
The recommended review of governance was carried out swiftly following the section 5 inspection. Governors have responded well to the comprehensive and informative review report. They have already started to ask more searching and incisive questions of senior leaders, including about students’ behaviour and behaviour management. I was left in no doubt about their determination to return the school to its ‘outstanding’ status, an ambition that is clearly shared in equal measure by the senior leadership team.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
An independent school improvement adviser has been contracted by the local authority to work with the school. She has provided helpful support and guidance with improvement planning and has led training for senior leaders in lesson observation. This has included a focus on observing teaching over time, rather than of single lesson episodes. It could be useful if this work were continued, to ensure that future observations in lessons give a clear focus to the impact of teaching on student attitudes to learning.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Brent and the Education Funding Agency.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion