Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Ruskin Mill College

Inspected — · published 19 Dec 2014 · URN 133036

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    GL6 0PL

  • Name on report verified

    Ruskin Mill College

  • URN verified

    133036

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+38Positivemore positive than 43% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongstronglysuccessfulindependentimprovingsecure
Criticismweaknessesconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionSafeguardingWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings25w+20
  • Safeguarding154w+21
  • What needs to improve179w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
357
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%Safeguarding 14%What needs to improve 17%About the inspection 67%

Full report text

Published date 17 December 2014 Inspection Number 447353 Unique reference number: 133036

p.1

Last day of inspection: 14 November 2014

p.1

Type of provider: Independent specialist college

p.1

Address:

The Fisheries Stroud Horsley GL6 0PL Telephone number: 01453 837500 Ruskin Mill College

p.1

Context and focus of visit

This is the third follow-up re-inspection monitoring visit to Ruskin Mill College following publication of the inspection report on 25 April 2014. The inspection found the effectiveness of leadership and management to be inadequate; teaching, learning and assessment were good, as were outcomes for learners. The overall effectiveness of the college was found to be inadequate.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

Ruskin Mill College is part of Ruskin Mill Trust Limited. The college is situated on a large site in Gloucestershire and provides a curriculum based on craft activities such as willow-, iron- and leather-work, and land-based activities that include organic horticulture, care of livestock and fish farming. The college provides for students with a range of learning disabilities, emotional needs and challenging behaviours.

p.2

Context and focus of visit

The focus of this visit was to evaluate the experience and understanding of learners in relation to safeguarding and the extent to which they feel safe, know how to keep themselves safe and what to do if they experience bullying, harassment or unwanted attention. This visit also looked at the changes in the senior management structure and the effectiveness of the self-assessment and quality improvement arrangements.

p.2

not at risk?

The safeguarding and welfare of all students is a clear priority for Ruskin Mill College. New students benefit from a more structured induction that reinforces the options available if they have concerns about their safety or well-being, or are worried about someone else. All students spoken to said they feel safe. However, not enough students can describe what feeling safe means to them or what being unsafe might involve. Students understand that bullying and inappropriate behaviour will not be tolerated. They know that they can talk to their student journey manager (SJM) or any other member of staff if they have concerns, and they have confidence that they will be listened to and taken seriously. Some year one students reported that even though they experienced bullying at school, no incidents of bullying have occurred since they started at Ruskin Mill College.

p.2

not at risk?

Students are positive about the recently-introduced web-based system that allows all staff to record incidents, concerns or achievements, and enables managers to monitor, analyse and respond quickly where necessary. Students can give their views on incidents and feel confident that the new system is fairer and used well by staff. The system continues to improve communication between residential and education staff. The student council plays an increasingly important role in representing students’ views, and members are encouraged to make recommendations about decisions affecting life at Ruskin Mill College. The student voice newsletter includes articles on anti-bullying activities, raising awareness about homophobia and e-safety. While student council members welcome the greater involvement, they need more training to give them the skills to be a highly effective council. Council members take their positions very seriously and feel a high level of responsibility when making

p.2

not at risk?

recommendations or suggesting activities. New students are aware of the council but are not yet clear about its function nor, in some cases, who their representatives are.

p.3

number of incidents that compromise the safety of students and staff?

Communication and collaborative working between residential and education staff continue to improve. The regular morning meetings and use of the support and attendance coordinator to report absences or possible late arrivals ensure that education staff can plan and respond appropriately. The reorganisation of the start of the college day, with a reduction in the amount of travel, and its frequency, which students have to undertake between areas of the college site, benefits students as they start their college day with minimal disruption or distractions.

p.3

number of incidents that compromise the safety of students and staff?

Staff training continues to have a strong emphasis on safeguarding. Specialist training, that enables staff to manage actual or potential aggression, is increasing their confidence in defusing difficult situations. Students are helped to express their anger, frustration or anxiety in a safe and controlled way.

p.3

number of incidents that compromise the safety of students and staff?

Students are very aware of the risks of using social media and other internet activities. The potential dangers students face and steps necessary to keep themselves safe are regularly discussed and reinforced in the learning environment, in the Ruskin Mill College residences and through the student council newsletter. Specialist software monitors all computer usage, identifies any inappropriate use of the internet and sends reports to the head of technical services for action if necessary.

p.3

provision including all aspects of safeguarding and health and safety?

The self-assessment report and quality improvement plan now have a stronger emphasis on the students’ experience, although a few areas for improvement relate more strongly to management concerns than to the needs of students. Managers are aware that some impact measures require further development; in particular, they need to make better use of available data in order to make judgements about how successful their improvement actions are. Ruskin Mill College now has its second temporary Principal since the last inspection. All temporary appointees demonstrated a very good understanding of the needs of the students and, with strong support from the trustees, maintained the emphasis on improving the provision and overcoming the identified weaknesses. They worked well with operational staff to implement quality improvement actions, motivate staff and improve morale. Two new assistant principals started at the beginning of the

p.3

provision including all aspects of safeguarding and health and safety?

academic year and a permanent Principal is due to start in the middle of November.

p.4

Reasonable improvement for learners

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231 or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.

p.5

Reasonable improvement for learners

To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’. Ofsted

p.5

Reasonable improvement for learners

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion