Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Dec 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Leszek Iwaskow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Leszek Iwaskow

  • Postcode verified

    L15 8JL

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−29Mixedmore positive than 11% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyimprovedclearimprovingeffectiveclearlystronglyrigorous
Criticismnot alwayspoorinconsistenciesweakweaknessesdisruptionrequires improvementnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,115
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Sue Horncastle Headteacher Our Lady of Good Help Catholic Primary School South Drive Wavertree Liverpool Merseyside L15 8JL

p.1

Help Catholic Primary School, Liverpool

Following my visit to your school on 2 December 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Help Catholic Primary School, Liverpool

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Help Catholic Primary School, Liverpool

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Help Catholic Primary School, Liverpool

 review the action plan to ensure that:  strategies are clear and specifically focussed on improvements in classroom practice  key dates are signposted to ensure that slippage in meeting targets does not occur  strategies to develop middle leadership are clearly linked to improving the quality of classroom teaching  approaches to improve reading throughout the school are added to the plan CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jbennett@cfbt.com  targets to improve the quality of performance management are clear and manageable

p.1

Help Catholic Primary School, Liverpool

 improve the quality of reading across the school by: - ensuring that the reading policy is applied consistently across all classes in the school - improving the quality and range of books available for pupils in the school library - making the regular use of dictionaries and thesauruses part of everyday lessons in order to develop spelling and grammar

p.2

Help Catholic Primary School, Liverpool

 continue to improve the learning environment, including the outdoor provision in the Reception class, in order that it is more conducive to supporting learning well.

p.2

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with yourself and your assistant headteacher, three representatives of the governing body and a group of pupils. A telephone conversation was held with a local authority officer to discuss the action being taken to improve provision in the school and the level of support being provided. The school’s development plan was also evaluated. In addition, a learning walk with you focussed on the quality of reading provision and the resources available to support reading across the school.

p.2

Context

Teaching and learning responsibilities have been restructured with a majority of teachers now teaching in different age groups than previously. A temporary teacher is covering maternity leave in Year 6 until the end of term. Subjects are now being taught discretely with individual subject responsibilities being identified. The governing body is due to be re-constituted in the near future.

p.2

Main findings

Some improvement has occurred in attainment in writing and mathematics at the end of Key Stage 2. However, reading is weak with most pupils in Year 6 behind where they should be for their age. These older pupils are still not accessing books as free readers. Overall, a clear gender gap exists with boys generally doing better than girls. However, it is a small number of girls who attain the higher levels. Boys are particulary poor at reading. Inconsistencies across classes continue to affect progress.

p.2

Main findings

The action plan does address most of the weaknesses identified during the recent inspection but does not always identify in sufficient detail how classroom practice is to be directly improved. Systems for monitoring provision and assessing pupils’ progress have now been put in place. It is too early to fully judge consistent impact. Pupils’ progress is now being tracked more rigorously. As a result, underachieving pupils are being identified more quickly and consistently enabling intervention to take place. The plan focuses strongly on management processes but less on direct improvement in the classroom. Milestones, against which stages in the improvement process can be cross-checked, need to be more clearly identified. Some initial links with partner schools to observe good practice have been established and more are planned for the immediate future.

p.2

Main findings

During the learning walk we looked specifically at how reading is being developed across the school. We agreed that inconsistencies remain across classes. Although, on the whole, books are changed regularly, few pupils are using their home reading records to provide feedback on their understanding of texts or to identify new vocabulary etc. Library resources are particulary poor and do not currently encourage a love of reading.

p.3

Main findings

The learning environment, including the outdoor play area in the Reception class, is often cluttered, can be dull and displays do not always stimulate or support learning.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils interviewed have begun to notice some changes, notably improved provision in sport and in computer access and hardware. They are aware that marking is more rigorous but, as yet, they do not always make the best use of opportunities to improve or correct their work. They consider behaviour around the school to be good although low level disruption still occurs in some classes.

p.3

Main findings

Middle leadership is at an early stage of development and currently remains more focussed on establishing procedures and systems rather than the development of sound classroom practice. The development of good subject knowledge or the acquisition of better resources is not yet evident.

p.3

Main findings

School governance is due to be re-constituted before the end of term. Governors understand why the school requires improvement. Several have become more pro- active in their duties. They are aware of the changes being initiated and the ongoing need to accelerate improvements in the classroom. Governors take an active role in regular challenge board meetings which monitor the progress being made towards improving the school.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The school was ‘light touch’ previously but is now being monitored by the local authority on a regular basis. The recent inspection has also generated more intensive support from mathematics, English and Early Years consultants. The school is utilising the planning provided by the local authority to ensure that the new curriculum requirements for English and mathematics are being met. In addition, support for the senior management team has been arranged from a National Leader in Education. There is a firm commitment to continue monitoring and support until the school is making the progress necessary to become a good school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Archdiocese of Liverpool and the Director of Children’s Services for Liverpool.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion