Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Thomas's CofE Primary School

Inspected 27 Nov 2014 · published 18 Dec 2014 · URN 112322

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Alison Thomson (lead), Sheila Mawer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Nov 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Alison Thomson, Sheila Mawer

  • Early years AI-checked

    Good

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LA9 5PP

  • Name on report verified

    St Thomas's CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    112322

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsGood
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimprovedgood progresseffectiveeffectivelyoutstandingsafemake good progressstrong
Criticismnot alwaysrequires improvementtoo fewnot consistentlyinadequatenot effectivedecliningnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1051w+44
  • What needs to improve2128w−39

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
3,066
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 27%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

St Thomas's CofE Primary School Kendal Green, Kendal, Cumbria, LA9 5PP

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Early years provision Good 2

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Teaching is not good enough to ensure that pupils achieve well. The actions of leaders, managers and governors have not been effective in bringing about improvement quickly enough.  The standards overall that pupils attain by the end of Year 6 have been declining for a number of years. They have started to rise, but only recently.  Too few pupils make the progress they are capable of, particularly in mathematics.  The quality of teaching is variable and not enough is consistently good or better. As a consequence, learning and progress are not yet good.  Teachers do not always make good use of information about what pupils can and cannot do and do not always plan lessons that match their needs well enough.  Teachers do not always have high enough expectations or pass these on to pupils. Sometimes the work does not provide enough challenge, particularly for the most able pupils.  Teachers’ marking is not of a consistently high

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

quality, especially in mathematics. There are not enough comments on how pupils can improve their work. When such comments are made, pupils are not given sufficient opportunities to respond to them.  Checks on the school’s improvement plans are not made often enough to gauge how well improvements are happening.  Teachers with subject responsibilities do not check effectively how well pupils are learning and progressing in their areas. They do not hold teachers to account sufficiently for the quality of their teaching and learning.  Leaders do not have a clear enough overview of the progress of different groups of pupils. As a result governors have not always been well placed to hold the school to account for the progress that pupils make.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The new headteacher is determined to improve the school and has a clear vision of what needs to be done. An effective focus on improving writing has already improved the standards pupils are achieving in this subject.  The school’s promotion of spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is good and this has a very positive effect on the pupils’ development.  Pupils’ behaviour and the school’s work to ensure their safety are both good. Most pupils show respect for others and are eager to learn. They have a good understanding of how to keep themselves and others safe.  The effectiveness of the early years is good and children make good progress there.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed 12 lessons taught by eight members of staff, one of which was a joint observation with the headteacher. In addition, the inspectors also made short visits to lessons and listened to pupils read.  The inspectors examined information provided by the school about the progress of pupils in the previous year. The inspectors looked at a wide range of work in pupils’ books and in displays around the school.  The inspectors met with two groups of pupils at lunchtime on day one and talked to many other pupils in class and around the school.  Meetings were held with the headteacher, assistant headteacher, other members of the senior leadership team, teachers in charge of subjects, four governors and a representative from the local authority.  The inspectors looked at a range of documents, including those relating to safeguarding and child protection and the school’s development plans.

p.2

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors scrutinised records on attendance and behaviour, as well as information about the quality of teaching and the performance of staff.  The inspectors took account of the 36 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) and the 26 responses from members of staff.

p.2

Inspection team

Alison Thomson, Lead inspector Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 St Thomas’s is an average-sized primary school.  Almost all pupils are from a White British background and speak English as their first language.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils supported by the pupil premium is average. (The pupil premium is additional funding for those pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those who are looked after by the local authority.)  The proportion of pupils who are disabled or who have special educational needs is average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for attainment and progress in English and mathematics.  Since the previous inspection there have been significant changes in staffing. This includes the headteacher who took up her post in January 2014.  The governing body has recently undergone significant changes, including the chair of governors.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that teaching is consistently good or better to raise achievement, particularly in mathematics, by:  using information about what pupils can and cannot do to plan lessons that meet pupils’ learning needs as effectively as possible  raising teachers’ expectations and giving work that stretches pupils, particularly the most able pupils  using marking to provide advice to pupils about how they can improve their work  giving pupils sufficient opportunities to respond to guidance about how they can improve their work.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management to bring about improvements more quickly by:  developing the skills of subject leaders to enable them to hold the staff in their areas to account more effectively for teaching and learning and for the progress that pupils make  focussing more clearly on learning and progress, including that in pupils’ work, when making judgements about the quality of teaching and follow up teachers’ areas for development rigorously  obtaining a clear overview of the progress of different groups of pupils across the school  providing governors with clear, succinct information about the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress to enable them to hold the school to account more effectively  checking regularly that the school’s plans for improvement undertaken by the school are having the desired impact.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.3

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Leadership and management, including governance, requires improvement because actions taken to improve teaching have not had sufficient impact on pupils’ achievement. This is particularly true of mathematics, especially in Key Stage 2. Leaders and managers have, however, created a culture where good behaviour supports pupils’ learning.  The new headteacher has a vision of where the school should be and a determination to get there. Already she has accurately identified areas to develop and is addressing these with some urgency. The decline in attainment has been halted, writing has improved considerably, governance has been strengthened and attendance has risen.  The leadership and management of teaching and learning requires improvement. Currently, observations are not focused well enough on pupils’ learning and progress and there is not enough scrutiny of pupils’ work. Teachers are given areas for improvement, but these are not followed up rigorously enough.

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Currently, leaders in charge of subjects do not hold teachers to account well enough for the progress that pupils make in their area of responsibility. They do not monitor the quality of teaching and do not have a clear overview of the progress that pupils make. They do not all have the expertise to do this as effectively as possible. As a result the quality of teaching and achievement are not rising quickly enough.  The staff questionnaire demonstrated that almost all staff are happy with all aspects of the school. However, some staff, including some subject leaders, have an over-optimistic view of how good the school is.  Senior leaders track the progress that pupils make, but this is not done regularly enough and summary evaluations of groups of pupils across the school are not carried out sufficiently well. This means that key information about the progress of pupils is not communicated well enough, for example to governors.

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Additional funding for disadvantaged pupils is used in many ways, including paying for additional teaching support. The spending is not yet fully effective, as it is not used well enough to improve the performance of the pupils for whom it is intended. However, the gaps between the performance of disadvantaged and the other pupils in school are beginning to close. This reflects the improving equality of opportunity and tackling of discrimination.  Safeguarding meets statutory requirements. Pupils and their parents agree strongly that the school keeps its pupils safe.  The curriculum is increasingly meeting the needs of the pupils, through the introduction of interesting topics. Literacy is embedded well in to other areas, but numeracy and information and communication technology (ICT) less well so. The school is aware of this and already has a training programme in place to boost staff expertise and confidence in using ICT as a teaching tool. Staff expertise and confidence is

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

also being boosted in physical education through the use of primary sports funding to provide training by specialist staff.  The school’s spiritual, moral, social and cultural provision is very strong and impacts well on pupils’ development in these areas. Music has a high profile and one rarely sees boys performing in the school choir so enthusiastically.  Support from the local authority in the past has not been effective. Attainment at the end of Year 6 had declined over a number of years during which time the local authority provided only light touch support. Now, targeted support has been provided since September 2014, after attainment had started to rise, and is only now beginning to have some impact.  The governance of the school:  The governing body has recently undergone significant changes, including the chair of governors. There is a renewed determination to improve the school and the governing body has put in place strategies to

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

ensure this. Each class now has a link governor to glean better information first hand. The governing body has already asked for help from the local authority regarding training and the inspectors endorse the view that a review is appropriate. Governors in the past have not been given clear, succinct information about the progress that different groups of pupils make in order for them to hold the school to account well enough in this area. In addition, they have not had an accurate view of the quality of teaching and have not been involved in linking teachers’ pay to their performance. They have played a role in the allocation of the budget, including that for disadvantaged pupils, but they are not aware of just how far behind disadvantaged pupils in the school are compared to all pupils nationally. It is impressive that the new governing body has not only recognised the need for change but has taken so

p.4

The leadership and management requires improvement

many steps to achieve this in such a short period of time.

p.4

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good. School records and adults who have looked after the pupils at lunchtimes for a number of years confirmed this. All staff who returned the questionnaire agreed that behaviour is good.  The pupils themselves rated behaviour as eight or nine out of 10. They told the inspectors that most people behave well, but a few can be silly at times.  The inspectors found the pupils to be polite and courteous and the school has many letters from visitors complimenting it on the behaviour of its pupils.  There are many opportunities for pupils to take on responsibility, such as the school council or helping in the dining hall.  Most pupils have a positive attitude to learning, work hard and take a pride in their work. When there are comments about how to improve their work, most pupils respond to them when they are given the opportunity to do so. A few pupils are more difficult to engage, especially when they find the work less

p.5

Behaviour

interesting or too easy.  Attendance is above average and improving. Pupils enjoy being at school and say that they like the school the way it is.

p.5

Safety

 The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Pupils say that they feel very safe and that adults look after them well.  The school has effective systems in place to ensure that pupils are kept safe, such as appropriate risk assessment for visits out of school.  Pupils told the inspectors that the school keeps them safe when they use computers because there are rules to follow and they are denied access to some websites.  Pupils have a good understanding of the different forms of bullying, including racist and homophobic bullying. They know that calling someone ‘gay’ is wrong and say that ‘people do not do that here’.  Parents agree that their children feel safe and that the school looks after them well.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The quality of teaching is not consistently good enough to result in pupils’ achievement being good.  Teachers do not always use information about what pupils can and cannot do to plan lessons with work that meets pupils’ needs well enough. As a result, this slows the progress that pupils make.  The expectations that staff have of pupils are sometimes not high enough, and so the work provided does not always stretch pupils sufficiently. This is particularly true of the most able pupils, who tend to find the work too easy.  Marking is not consistently effective in letting pupils know how they can improve their work. In addition, when such comments are present, teachers do not give pupils sufficient opportunities to respond to their advice. That said, there is some marking that does help pupils to improve. This is especially true in writing, which improved greatly in Key Stage 2 last year, compared to the previous year.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The impact of the work of teaching assistants is variable. Whilst teachers deploy and guide them well lower down the school, this is not always the case higher up the school, especially in mathematics and with the most able pupils.  There is evidence that some teaching is consistently good, especially in the early years. This has resulted in the children making good progress there. Teaching is currently resulting in good progress in Key Stage 1, particularly in reading and writing. This was confirmed during the inspection by visits to lessons and the work in pupils’ books.  The teaching of reading is generally good, particularly for the younger pupils. Listening to Year 2 pupils read confirmed their love of reading. Strategies to encourage younger readers are reaping benefits and are now being rolled out higher up the school.  The teaching of writing has improved. Topics such as volcanoes and famous people from Brazil, such as

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

the footballer Pele, have generated a renewed interest especially from the boys who were underachieving previously.  Parents generally feel that teaching is good, as determined from the online questionnaire. However, the inspectors judged that teaching requires improvement as too few pupils are achieving as highly as they should.

p.5

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Achievement requires improvement because too few pupils make the progress they are capable of, especially in mathematics. This is true for all groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, those who are disabled, those who have special educational needs and the most able pupils.  Attainment overall at the end of Year 6 has been declining since the previous inspection. In 2013 nationally published data showed that attainment was below average in mathematics and reading and significantly below in writing. Attainment in writing rose in 2014 to be broadly in line with that found nationally as a result of a whole-school focus on writing. However, attainment in mathematics declined further and was significantly below average.  The achievement of disadvantaged pupils requires improvement. Published data for 2014 show that disadvantaged pupils in school were about two terms behind in reading and writing and nearly five terms

p.6

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

behind in mathematics compared to all pupils nationally. Gaps between disadvantaged pupils and the other pupils in school are beginning to close, with disadvantaged pupils about two terms behind in writing and about three terms behind in reading and mathematics.  The achievement of pupils who are disabled or have special educational needs also requires improvement, particularly in mathematics. The work they are given does not always match their needs well enough. Sometimes it is too difficult for them, despite the efforts of teaching assistants to help them.  The progress of the most able pupils requires improvement. Too few of them reach the higher levels that they are capable of. This is because they are not always given work that offers them sufficient challenge. Therefore their thinking is not deepened well enough.  Pupils tend to make better progress in the early years and in Key Stage 1 because the quality of teaching

p.6

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

is stronger there.  Special coaching paid through the primary sports funding has increased pupils' enjoyment and participation in sport, as well as increasing the level of performance. Last year, for example, pupils played cricket at county level.  Pupils read widely and often, particularly the younger pupils. This was confirmed by listening to some Year 2 pupils read. The school’s successful reading challenge in Year 2 is now being extended into Key Stage 2.  Literacy is reinforced well throughout the curriculum and accounts for pupils’ higher performance in reading. Numeracy is reinforced less well. The school is in the process of developing ICT, through providing teachers with more training in its delivery.

p.6

The early years provision is good

 Children settle successfully into school life through strong links with parents, the feeder Nursery provision and the local children’s centre. Parents appreciate particularly the home visits that are made and the valuable information that is shared about their child’s progress in the home/school diaries.  Most children start school with skills and knowledge that allow them to start learning straightaway in the Reception Year, although aspects of language development and some social skills are sometimes weak.  The quality of provision in the early years is good and children make good progress. Many children reach a good level of development by the end of Reception and some children exceed this level, but not in mathematics or writing.  Teaching is good. The indoor classroom and outdoor area provide a good balance of teacher-led tasks and tasks children choose for themselves. Activities are well organised and help children to be confident,

p.6

The early years provision is good

engaged and active in their learning.  Writing is being incorporated well into many tasks. For example, in the story of Rama and Sita the teacher successfully helped children to learn initial letter sounds and to transfer their knowledge to writing a simple sentence about the story. The topic of this activity is one example of how children learn about other religions and cultures.  Usually adults intervene and move learning on by careful questioning. However, sometimes the questions from adults do not always enable the children to think hard in a more challenging way.  The early years provides good quality care. Parents are very appreciative of the opportunities children have to experience interesting activities in the outdoor learning areas. For example, as well as learning how to follow a trail safely, children also learn how to build their own shelter.  Children behave sensibly at all times and respect each other when working together on tasks.

p.6

The early years provision is good

 The early years is well led. The leader has a very clear picture of how to make the learning even more effective. For example, she has developed well-focused and regular phonics sessions, which are impacting positively on the good progress that children are making in their writing.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is failing

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 112322 Local authority Cumbria Inspection number 448420

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary aided Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 213 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mick Brookes Headteacher Maggie Cole Date of previous school inspection 22 June 2010 Telephone number 01539 737373 Fax number 01539 737376 Email address admin@stthomas.cumbria.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion