Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Sims
- Postcode verified
WR12 7BD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development3
“Since the last inspection there have been no changes to staffing.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 988
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Dr Tessa Browning Broadway First School Lime Tree Avenue Broadway WR12 7BD
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 4 December 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
Strengthen leadership and management, particularly in the Early Years Foundation Stage, so that the school does not become over-dependent on the extensive support it has received. Check the impact of teaching assistants on pupil learning as closely as that carried out for teachers Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, a group of pupils, four members of the Governing Body including the chair and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school’s action plan was evaluated. Other documents were scrutinised including the latest achievement data analysis and records of interventions for specific pupils
p.2
Context
Since the last inspection there have been no changes to staffing. An associate governor has been very recently appointed and an experienced deputy headteacher will be seconded to the school for one term from January 2015.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders of the school, including governors, have a realistic view of the school’s strengths and areas for development. They have recognised the need to strengthen the leadership of the school as its first priority. Although the recent recruitment campaign was unsuccessful in appointing a deputy headteacher, an experienced deputy head has been seconded for the spring term and the post has been re- advertised.
p.2
Main findings
Governors have recently established a data committee to check pupils’ progress and attainment although it has yet to have its first meeting. An additional appointment has been made in order to strengthen the governing body. Governors spoken to say that are now receiving more detailed information, for example on achievement data which enables them to ask challenging questions. They also reported that minutes of meetings now more accurately reflect the questions asked and discussions held. There are very active governor links for literacy and numeracy.
p.2
Main findings
Middle leaders are still inexperienced in their role and some who are new have not yet been involved in monitoring teaching, analysing data or conducting pupil progress meetings. They have action plans to carry out these roles in the future however. Two middle leaders were able to gain some experience as joint acting headteachers this term during your recent illness.
p.2
Main findings
The school’s action plan is detailed and is appropriately linked to the development points raised in the last inspection report. Milestones are included but do not indicate details which would enable governors to determine whether the proportion of pupils making expected or more than expected progress is sufficient for the school to be in line to achieve its end of term targets.
p.2
Main findings
Leadership of the Early Years Foundation Stage still remains to be resolved. As there is not a designated coordinator the role is being covered out by you. The school has received considerable external help and provided its own internal support to bring about some improvements to the Early Years environment, planning and work to engage boys.
p.2
Main findings
Pupil progress meetings are held twice termly with teachers. You have ensured that half termly data on pupil achievement provided by teachers is more accurate firstly through internal checking and then externally with the local cluster of schools. Links have been developed with the main feeder middle school to ensure a common understanding of pupils’ levels when they transfer from the first school.
p.3
Main findings
Pupils said they had seen improvements in teaching and in mathematics particularly where lessons are more fun and challenging. They were less keen on religious education and they criticised the quality of some of the supply teaching they had previously experienced.
p.3
Main findings
The school has taken measures to engage boys more in their learning. Boys spoken to during the visit were particularly enthused by the topic of crime and punishment which included role play of a court case. Leaders recognise that writing remains an issue throughout most of the school and will be a key focus for the seconded deputy headteacher. The school has sought to give pupils real life experiences such as a visit to the Cheltenham festival in order to inspire pupils’ writing.
p.3
Main findings
Leaders have sought to improve teaching through support, modelling how to ask questions and planning. The impact of teaching assistants is not checked as closely as it is for teachers.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has provided significant support to the school as well as brokered support from other schools, for example in arranging for a seconded deputy headteacher post for one term. It monitors the work of the school closely through regularly monthly project board meetings. It has provided extensive support to the Early Years Foundation Stage, Special Educational Needs, teaching and learning and leadership and management and has more days planned for the Spring Term. In addition to checking the work of the school it has provided training.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Worcestershire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion