Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Dec 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Mitcheson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Mitcheson

  • Postcode verified

    NR33 0RQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelystrengthsimprovedpromptlyerrorssafe
Criticismweaknessesineffectivelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings679w+5
  • What needs to improve286w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
965
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%What needs to improve 30%

Full report text

Judith Sherington Headteacher The Attic The Attic Learning Centre Lovewell Road Lowestoft NR33 0RQ

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Attic

Following my visit to your centre on 26 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Attic

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the centre was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Attic

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, the acting lead teacher of The Walpole Learning Centre, the Chair of the Management Committee and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The centre’s development plan was evaluated. An opportunity to walk the Walpole Learning Centre with you, and The Attic Learning Centre with your deputy headteacher enabled me to see students at work in lessons. A range of documentation was scrutinised, including a sample of students’ work. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com

p.1

Context

Currently, eight students are taught at the Walpole Learning Centre. Twenty five are taught at The Attic Learning Centre. Interviews to appoint a substantive lead teacher of the Walpole Learning Centre will be held later this term. Since the last inspection, a new Chair of the Management Committee has been appointed.

p.2

Main findings

You have responded promptly to the issues raised in the last inspection. Development plans have been updated to prioritise the main areas identified for improvement. These plans include targets and timescales which you are beginning to use to evaluate the impact you and your staff are having on securing improvements.

p.2

Main findings

Staff training has taken place to strengthen the quality of teaching on both sites. A new marking policy is in place but it is not firmly embedded. Scrutinising a small sample of books showed that in English, marking is regular and provides good quality feedback to students, particularly in their extended writing. It is not correcting basic errors in their spelling and grammar. Marking is less frequent in mathematics and does not tell students what they can do to improve their work.

p.2

Main findings

You have linked each of your teaching assistants with a teacher to help them develop the skills they need to support students’ learning more effectively. Teaching assistants have been trained to provide individual students with short, daily support sessions to promote their reading, speaking and listening skills. Currently, students’ work in these sessions shows that there are few opportunities to write a length and that some students remain too dependent on staff to complete work for them.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers and teaching assistants have been set new targets to enable you to manage their performance. Regular observations of lessons are providing you with a clearer overview of the strengths and weaknesses of teaching and its impact on learning. Some ineffective teaching remains. This is being managed appropriately.

p.2

Main findings

Assessment data is shared each half-term with teachers to indicate students’ prior learning and the targets they are expected to attain in each subject. Data shows that currently, a higher proportion of students are making or exceeding expected progress in mathematics compared with English or science. You feel that by the time the next round of assessments are made, data will show that larger proportions of students are making improved progress in all subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Attendance remains low. Warning notices and fines administered to parents, and monitoring by key workers and an education welfare officer have led to some improvements, but your current data shows that a quarter of students are regularly absent from the centre. You and the Chair of the Management Committee acknowledge that attendance must rise significantly if the centre is to be judged good at its next inspection. You are investigating potential links with other providers and local businesses to provide additional opportunities to study vocational awards off- site.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers have assumed responsibility for leading English, mathematics, science, personal, social and health education and humanities. They have been given time to lead staff training and to meet with you to evaluate the impact they are having. Their ability to lead and manage improvements in their subjects forms part of the procedures to manage their performance.

p.3

Main findings

The Management Committee shares your ambitions to improve provision and ensure that all students gain the basic qualifications needed for the next stage of their education, training or the workplace. They have contributed to improvement planning and know what needs to be done to make the centre a good one. Action is being taken to recruit new members. A safeguarding audit has been completed to ensure that students in the centre are kept safe.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the centre until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

You value the support provided by the local authority to refurbish the building, including a new science laboratory and to improve teaching resources. Training provided for staff this term, and the specialist support given to you to resolve staffing issues have been effective.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Management Committee and the Director of Children’s Services for Suffolk.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority – including where the school is an academy

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion