Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Surrey County Council in Surrey

Inspected — · published 10 Dec 2014 · URN SC068827

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Hunnam

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectors verified

    Janet Hunnam

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    KT15 2EP

  • URN verified

    SC068827

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−25Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseimproveddelay
Criticismdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings67w0
  • What needs to improve264w−25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
330
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 50
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 22%About the inspection 73%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC068827 Inspector Janet Hunnam Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Registered person Surrey County Council Registered person address Surrey County Council, Children's & Safeguarding Service Runnymede Centre, Chertsey Road ADDLESTONE Surrey KT15 2EP Responsible individual Louise Warren Registered manager Hannah Katherine Phillips Date of last inspection 14/05/2014 2 of 6 Inspection date 24/10/2014

p.1

Previous inspection good Enforcement action since last inspection none

p.2

This inspection

This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At this interim inspection Ofsted judge that it has sustained effectiveness .

p.2

This inspection

At the previous inspection in May 2014, the home was judged good for overall effectiveness. Three recommendations were made.

p.2

This inspection

Two recommendations relate to incidents involving physical intervention. Incidents involving physical intervention at the home are rare. There has been only one such incident recorded since the last inspection. Records demonstrate that the young person was offered medical assistance and clearly record the reason for the restraint. Both these recommendations are met. Examination of incident reports, however, shows that there has been one incident that has not been appropriately recorded. Staff used low-level physical intervention as a response to a young person’s challenging behaviour. This incident was not recorded in the physical intervention log and consequently impedes the manager’s effective monitoring of staff practice.

p.2

This inspection

The other recommendation relates to recording young people’s progress clearly and this has been met.

p.2

This inspection

Some young people are making significant progress at the home and benefit from highly individualised support and positive, trusting relationships with staff. Since the last inspection, a young person has moved from the home to supported accommodation with a well-planned, successful transition. There have been other young people, however, who have moved from the home in an unplanned way. This was due to an increase in their risk-taking behaviour and the consequent level of risk they presented to other young people at the home.

p.2

This inspection

To ensure newly resident young people will be compatible with the existing group, managers have implemented an impact risk assessment prior to a young person being placed at the home. This enables managers to consider the specific risks 3 of 6 linked to the young person’s behaviour and the potential effect on the welfare of young people already resident at the home. This ensures staff identify young people’s specific vulnerabilities and that appropriate strategies are in place when a young person is newly resident. This process includes liaison with the police missing from home coordinator when necessary, to ensure effective measures are in place to protect young people.

p.2

This inspection

Risk assessments and individual protocols for young people who may leave the home without permission and be at risk of harm are highly detailed and comprehensive. Staff review these risk assessments frequently and effective systems are in place to ensure all staff are aware of any increased risks and changes in strategies to safeguard young people. There have been occasions when young people have left the home without permission but the home implements effective procedures in line with local police protocols.

p.3

This inspection

The home has made a recent notification relating to a young person disclosing sexual exploitation. This has been referred appropriately to the relevant authorities as a safeguarding incident ensuring that child protection processes are implemented to protect the young person. The home has managed this disclosure effectively ensuring safeguarding measures and updated risk assessments are in place focusing on preventive measures to keep young people safe. Staff receive training in safeguarding young people but not all staff have undertaken specific training in child sexual exploitation. Such training is necessary to ensure they are fully aware of their role and responsibilities in relation to keeping young people safe from sexual exploitation and they know how to respond appropriately when they suspect it may be occurring.

p.3

This inspection

The home has received two complaints from young people since the last inspection. These relate to allegations against staff and have been appropriately referred to the local authority designated officer. They have not, however, been notified to Ofsted in line with regulations. Such omissions compromise the ability of the regulatory authority to monitor whether appropriate action is being taken following incidents that significantly affect the welfare of young people.

p.3

This inspection

Effective monitoring systems are in place to maintain high standards of care. The Registered Manager undertakes monthly monitoring resulting in an action plan to address any shortfalls and improve the service. The Registered Manager submits quarterly reports to Ofsted. Monthly monitoring reports by an external visitor contribute effectively to this quality assurance system. The Registered Manager clearly understands the strengths and weaknesses of the service. She is developing new consultation processes for young people and new recording systems to inform individual care plans for young people and improve their care. The Registered Manager provides forward-thinking leadership and leads the committed staff team effectively in providing high quality care and promoting positive outcomes for young people. 4 of 6

p.3

Information about this children’s home

The home accommodates up to five young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties. The home is owned and managed by a local authority.

p.4

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

14/05/2014 Full good 09/05/2013 Full adequate 06/03/2013 Interim inadequate progress 14/06/2012 Full adequate

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

17B (2001) ensure that within 24 hours of the use of any measure of control, restraint or discipline in a children's home, a written record is made in a volume kept for the purpose (Regulation 17B(3)) 28/11/2014

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure that if, in relation to a children's home, any of the events listed in column 1 of the table in Schedule 5 takes place, the registered person shall without delay notify the persons indicated in respect of the event in column 2 of the table. (Regulation 30(1)) 28/11/2014

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s): 5 of 6  ensure that staff are equipped with the skills required to meet the needs of the children and purpose of the setting, and training keeps them up-to- date with professional, legal and practice developments, specifically in relation to child sexual exploitation. (NMS 18.1) Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.4

Recommendations

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.6

What inspection judgements mean

At the interim inspections we make a judgement on whether the home has improved in effectiveness, sustained effectiveness, or declined in effectiveness since the previous full inspection. This is in line with the Inspection of children’s homes: framework for inspection.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

Information about this inspection

The report details the main strengths, any areas for improvement, including any breaches of regulation, and any failure to meet national minimum standards. The judgements included in the report are made against the framework of inspection for children's homes.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion