Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Dec 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    HP2 7HL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisepositiveeffectiveconsistentlyeffectivelyvery wellhigh-qualityimprovingfeel safe
Criticismpoordeclinednot alwaysseriouslydecliningnot consistentlyabsencepersistent absence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1018w+9
  • What needs to improve54w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,068
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Mr Edward Gaynor Headteacher The Astley Cooper School St Agnell's Lane Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire HP2 7HL

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of The Astley Cooper School

Following my visit to your school on 25 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss behaviour at the school.

p.1

No formal designation monitoring inspection of The Astley Cooper School

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with the no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out because the Chief Inspector was concerned about behaviour at the school.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors considered evidence including:

p.1

Evidence

 observations of students’ behaviour and their attitudes to learning in lessons  observations of students’ behaviour throughout the day, including discussion with students  documentary evidence  discussions with school leaders and staff.

p.1

Evidence

Having evaluated all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Evidence

Leaders and managers have taken effective action to improve behaviour and secure consistently positive attitudes to learning. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct Telephone: 0121 679 9163 Direct Email: lewis.mackie1@serco.com

p.1

Context

The Astley Cooper School is a smaller than average-sized secondary school, with a small sixth form. The number of students eligible for the pupil premium (extra government funding to support particular groups of students) is higher than average. The proportion of disabled students and those who have special educational needs is average. The proportions of students from minority ethnic backgrounds and those who speak English as an additional language are in line with national figures. The proportion of students who join or leave the school other than at usual transfer times is well above the national average.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of students

The school has prioritised improving attendance in its development planning and has taken effective action to reduce absence. All students are given individual attendance targets and students know how their own attendance compares to these. The importance of good attendance and the latest information about levels of absence in each year group are a regular focus in assemblies. Last year the attendance of students at the school was in line with the national average for the first time and has continued to improve this year. Persistent absence has also declined and last year was only slightly above national levels. Students are usually punctual arriving to school in the morning. However, they do not always move to lessons between periods and after break or lunchtimes as quickly as they could unless directed to do so by staff.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of students

Students move around the corridors, classrooms and staircases calmly and sensibly. Students are courteous and friendly to adults and each other. They hold doors open for staff and their classmates without being asked. They look after the site well and do not drop much litter. Breaks and lunchtimes are well supervised by adults. This year the school has increased the range of locations accessible to students during lunchtimes, including opening up a ‘common room’ for Year 11 and the inclusion centre for vulnerable students. This has helped reduce the number of incidents of poor behaviour at lunchtime.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of students

School leaders have strengthened the school’s ‘on-call’ system so the presence of senior staff on duty during lesson times is highly visible to staff and students alike. As a result, the numbers of students who have to be removed from lessons has declined sharply. This year there has been a new emphasis upon positive rewards for good conduct alongside effective sanctions for poor behaviour and this has had a positive impact on student attitudes, particularly in Key Stage 3.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of students

Students explained that they feel safe in all areas of the school and if any issues arise they feel confident that adults will listen and take appropriate action. Students reported that bullying in the school is very rare but when it occurs it is dealt with very seriously and effectively, and this view is supported by evidence in the school’s careful record keeping of such incidents. The school uses an isolation room to help improve the behaviour of students who need to be temporarily removed from mainstream lessons. These students are very well supported by staff and care is taken to ensure their swift and successful reintegration into normal lessons.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of students

The expectations of school leaders about the appearance and behaviour of students are communicated very clearly to students and staff and, as a result, most students wear their uniforms smartly and behave well. Students who arrive at school in incorrect uniform have to report to the school’s inclusion unit to ensure that any issues are addressed before they return to lessons.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of students

Staff within the school’s inclusion unit are working increasingly effectively with students to help them understand the causes of their poor behaviour and to equip them with strategies to help them behave well. As a consequence the number of students who receive fixed-term exclusions is declining. However, the proportion of students who are temporarily excluded from school was still above the national average last year and has not declined rapidly enough this year.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of students

Students’ attitudes to their learning are becoming increasingly positive. They routinely bring the correct equipment to lessons. They listen attentively to teacher explanations and lessons are routinely purposeful and productive. The attitudes of students in Key Stage 3 are no longer notably less positive than those of Key Stage 4 students, as had been identified during the last inspection. School leaders now ensure that every lesson observation they undertake results in a judgement about behaviour and the data generated is systematically analysed. This analysis shows that behaviour in lessons is improving.

p.3

Behaviour and safety of students

School leaders have introduced other changes to help promote constructive attitudes to learning. For example, every Tuesday all students in the school undertake half an hour of silent personal reading. This is completed impeccably by students in all key stages. Students say that this has helped them to develop not only their reading skills but also their ability to concentrate for extended periods, and this is increasingly evident in lessons. Students do not, however, routinely take enough care with the presentation of their work and staff do not consistently apply the school presentation policy to help students develop a more meticulous attitude to producing high-quality written work.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that students move swiftly to their lessons between periods and after break and lunchtime.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that students consistently present their work carefully.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire and the Chair of the Governing Body. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion