Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Dec 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ken Buxton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ken Buxton

  • Postcode verified

    BA2 1QR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+31Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivevery wellimprovedmake good progresssuccessfullystrengthssuccessfulimproving
Criticismlackslackinconsistencyvariablenot successfullylowabsencebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,123
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Paul Mattausch Burrows Headteacher Twerton Infant School Poolemead Road Twerton Bath BA2 1QR

p.1

School

Following my visit, with Karen Gannon HMI, to your school on 21 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, two governors and two representatives of the local authority. In addition, the inspector visited three lessons with the headteacher to observe the teaching of phonics. Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Email : suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

Since the last monitoring inspection, two teachers and two support staff have been appointed to the school. In addition, the membership of the governing body has changed and a new clerk to the governing body has been appointed.

p.2

Context

A new purpose-built facility for two-year olds has opened within the grounds of the school.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s leadership team has focused their improvement strategies on the areas identified in the last inspection report. However, the improvement plan lacks sufficient detail although it provides an overview of how the initiatives are being implemented. The plan does not make clear who has responsibility for leading each initiative; neither does it state who will monitor and evaluate the impact of each action and it does not provide dates when progress will be assessed. These are strategic leadership issues, which have not been addressed successfully by the headteacher. Whilst these issues remain, the work being undertaken in the classrooms provides evidence that the staff are improving pupils’ performance.

p.2

Main findings

To support the headteacher, the other members of the senior leadership team have taken on an extensive list of responsibilities. They have also taken a lead in bringing about the improvements seen in the school.

p.2

Main findings

Many of the staff comment that morale at the school is low. Staff at the school cite work overload and a lack of strategic leadership from the headteacher as the key reasons for increased levels of stress and staff absence.

p.2

Main findings

Actions taken by members of the senior leadership team are having a beneficial impact on pupils’ achievement. The newly opened provision for two-year olds is already supporting the school’s work by better preparing children to join the Nursery class.

p.2

Main findings

The teacher with responsibility for the Early Years Foundation Stage has developed effective systems for assessing children’s performance. As a result, staff have a good knowledge and understanding of each child’s development. Similarly, staff in Key Stage 1 track pupils’ progress very thoroughly and have a good understanding of pupils’ development.

p.2

Main findings

The leader of Key Stage 1 has focused successfully on strengthening the quality of phonics teaching. As a result, the performance of Year 1 pupils in the 2014 phonics check was higher than achieved in 2013. Overall, pupils’ results in 2014 increased to be slightly above the national average. Boys achieved as well as girls and disadvantaged pupils’ results are only just below other Year 1 pupils. Pupils with special educational needs performed well in the 2014 phonics check. In 2014, Year 2 pupils achieved well. Pupils’ attainment in reading rose to be slightly higher than the results obtained in 2013 and just above the national average. In writing and mathematics, pupils reached standards significantly above average. Importantly, there was also an improvement on last year’s results with more pupils reaching the higher levels in writing and mathematics. Year 2 boys did well and reached levels above the national average. However, the girls did even better by

p.2

Main findings

out-performing boys in all subjects. Pleasingly, disadvantaged pupils also performed very well in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils with special educational needs also achieved well.

p.3

Main findings

The evidence shows that pupils learn and benefit from the opportunities that are planned for them. The school uses its pupil premium funding appropriately. Eligible pupils benefit from the extra support and experiences that broaden their knowledge and help them to make good progress.

p.3

Main findings

The school’s monitoring of teaching has identified the strengths and the areas of inconsistency that need to be improved. As a result, the quality of teaching is strengthening across the school. School leaders use evidence from lesson observations as part of the school’s performance management process to hold teachers to account for pupils’ progress. Leaders’ feedback to teachers arising from lesson observations is detailed and has improved. The key stage leaders have initiated an appropriate focus on raising teachers’ expectations of what the pupils can achieve. Staff have also strengthened the quality of their marking. As a result, pupils have a better understanding of how well they are performing. There is firm evidence to show that teachers are taking great care to record pupils’ work and comment on the learning that has taken place. For example, teachers working in the Early Years Foundation Stage have introduced work books

p.3

Main findings

that show very clearly the progress children are making.

p.3

Main findings

The Chair of the Governing Body has led the transformation of the governing body. Governors have a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities. They have made a significant impact developing and strengthening the work of the school. Governors are increasingly holding the school leaders to account for the quality and impact of their work. Overall, the governors find the quality of the headteacher’s reports to be too variable.

p.3

External support

The local authority has provided intensive support to improve and strengthen the quality of leadership and management. The local authority’s work to strengthen the governing body has been very successful. The decision to engage a national leader of governance to act as a temporary Chair of the Governing Body has led to a much stronger and more effective group of governors. The local authority’s decision to create a new facility for two-year olds at the school is making a significant contribution to children’s development in preparation for them joining the Nursery Year. The headteacher supported the project by working with the local authority to design the scheme. The facility is also providing an additional resource for the local community.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Bath and North East Somerset.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion