Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 5 Dec 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Diana Choulerton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Diana Choulerton

  • Postcode verified

    MK3 6EW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovingstrongeffectivelykeen

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mr G Booth Headteacher Rickley Park Primary School Rickley Lane Bletchley MK3 6EW

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 19 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

School

set targets for the improvements expected in the progress of different group of pupils by key points in the year, so that leaders and governors can see if the academy is on track to meet its longer term targets for improving pupils’ achievement.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you and members of the governing body to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I scrutinised documents, including the academy’s action plans and information about pupils’ progress. We briefly visited lessons around the academy to see teaching and learning. Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Main findings

You are taking swift and decisive action to improve the academy. This action, is already leading to improvements in leadership, management and teaching. Your comprehensive action plans focus well on tackling the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. The plan details the actions to be taken by key points in the year, the change in practice each action should bring and how each will be evaluated. Leaders are following the plan assiduously.

p.2

Main findings

Senior and subject leaders are starting to take responsibility for work that previously you did alone. You are making sure they get the training and support they need to do this. Senior and subject leaders are now required to run the meetings at which teachers are held to account for the progress of their pupils. You have arranged support from a local teaching school to help leaders develop an effective and shared approach. Leaders with the necessary skills and experience now make weekly visits to lessons and look at pupils’ work. They identify what is working well and what needs to improve. Less experienced leaders are having training and support to prepare them for this new responsibility, before they carry it out.

p.2

Main findings

You have made several well-considered changes to strengthen pupils’ development of reading and writing skills. All pupils in Year 1 and those who need it in Year 2, now have daily phonics sessions. Teachers now use an approach to writing that has been effective in other schools. Pupils doing longer pieces of writing receive shorter and more frequent guidance, to help keep them on track and maintain their focus.

p.2

Main findings

Your teaching and learning policy sets suitable expectations. Teachers receive regular training to help them meet these expectations and make effective use of new approaches that have been introduced. Increasingly this includes teachers sharing good practice with each other. Teachers who need the most support to improve receive individual coaching. Teaching assistants are also getting more development opportunities. They attend whole staff training sessions and are doing a course to help them understand their role better and how to support learning more effectively.

p.2

Main findings

Governors know what needs to improve and how they will hold leaders to account. Their strong understanding of performance data helps them do this well. They have changed the way they work to make sure they focus intensely on improving the academy. The governing body now meets twice a term instead of once and individual governors monitor specific sections of the action plan. These governors visit the academy between meetings to review, in detail, the progress made in the section of the plan they are responsible for. The governing body is keen to be as effective as possible and it has commissioned an external review to help decide the best way forward. You are now well positioned to improve pupils’ achievement. However, your targets for this improvement are not as sharp as they need to be. You have not defined the increased proportions of different groups of pupils you expect to see on track to make expected or more than expected progress at key points in the year. As a

p.2

Main findings

result, it is difficult for leaders and governors to check if the progress of each group of pupils is improving as quickly as it needs to.

p.3

External support

Before September 2014 the academy received little external support. You are working well to address this. You have set up links with the local teaching school to provide support for leadership development. An Oxfordshire local authority adviser is working with the teachers in the early years provision to review and improve it. She has also helped initiate the changes in phonics teaching in Key Stage 1. An education consultant provides coaching for teachers and the local authority is arranging an external review of governance. You are exploring opportunities for further support with the local authority.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Milton Keynes.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion