Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Nov 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jan Bennett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jan Bennett

  • Postcode verified

    DN21 2ST

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−29Mixedmore positive than 11% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Criticismnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings28w0
  • What needs to improve67w−29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
95
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 3%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 91%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr D Allsop Headteacher The Queen Elizabeth's High School Morton Terrace Gainsborough Lincolnshire DN21 2ST

p.1

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 10 and 11 November 2014 to look at work in mathematics.

p.1

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and students; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of students’ work; and visits to lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The overall effectiveness of mathematics is outstanding.

p.1

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Leadership and management of mathematics are outstanding.

p.1

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

 Over the last few years the head of department and his team have been relentless in their pursuit of excellence. With the support of the senior team they have raised achievement to the highest level and made the department one of the strongest in the school.  The department’s performance is very closely monitored by both senior leaders and the mathematics team. All have a very accurate view of the quality of provision and are constantly looking at ways to improve. Performance management is robust.  The department has a wealth of experience, an excellent team spirit and a wide range of valuable skills. There is much informal sharing of ideas, resources and expertise both within the department and with former colleagues and ex-students working in the local area. The department is very stable and has no difficulty attracting high-quality applicants when vacancies arise.  Professional development and training are focused on changes to the

p.1

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

curriculum but teachers are also encouraged to attend courses to develop their own practice. For example, one teacher is on an outstanding teachers’ programme and another is studying Open University mathematics modules. They share their learning with colleagues and all are benefiting.

p.2

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

The curriculum in mathematics is outstanding.

p.2

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

 The curriculum is responsive, adaptable and very closely tailored to the needs of students. Schemes of work have in-built flexibility allowing teachers to use their professional judgement and expertise. Regular tests ensure that topics are completed by a fixed date ensuring that any resulting movement between sets causes minimal disruption to learning.  The new Key Stage 3 curriculum has been successfully introduced supported by a well-planned scheme of work giving very good guidance and useful links to resources. The team continues to develop further resources, especially for new topics such as surds, and is working on plans for the new GCSEs.  Excellent subject support is available. Students’ progress is tracked very closely and interventions are put in place quickly. They include one-to-one support, small-group work and attendance at a weekly mathematics club. Students in receipt of support say that it accelerates their learning,

p.2

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

improves understanding and gives them confidence in their own ability to tackle mathematics problems. Sixth formers are used well to mentor younger students and each other. Students speak particularly highly of the accessibility to impromptu help from the mathematics team at breaks and lunchtime.  The school has strong links with primary schools and delivers regular sessions for gifted and talented pupils in Year 5 and 6. An annual mathematics challenge event promotes enjoyment of mathematics among primary pupils and provides an opportunity for primary teachers to share experiences with each other and the Queen Elizabeth’s team. The school is an active participant in the UK Mathematics Challenge, entering students at all levels with teams reaching the finals in some years.

p.2

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

 All teachers are experienced subject specialists who have a passion for teaching and a love of mathematics. The quality of teaching is consistently high. Temporary cover for absent teachers is provided by an able mathematician who has a teaching qualification from outside the United Kingdom.  All teachers work hard to build a thorough grasp of underlying concepts and are prepared to take students back several steps to secure understanding. Teachers have different teaching styles. Very creative and innovative ideas are utilised well by some while others use a more traditional but highly skilled approach.  Teachers are extremely adept at moving around the classroom to check students’ understanding and progress. They join in discussions, pose challenging and provocative questions and probe misconceptions very effectively. They use their experience well to anticipate common misunderstandings in order to avoid them. Marking is improving strongly

p.2

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

and regular written feedback is given. Students heed well the good advice that they are given.

p.3

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

Achievement in mathematics is outstanding.

p.3

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

 GCSE pass rates are very high. In 2014, all Year 11 students obtained a grade C or above and over half achieved a grade A* or A. By the end of Year 11, the proportion making better than expected progress is much higher than average and value-added statistics confirm that Queen Elizabeth’s students make much better progress than similar students nationally. A-level pass rates are high with a larger-than-average proportion of high grades. Disadvantaged students achieve in line with their peers.  Students participate very well in class and are not daunted by challenging or unusual tasks. They have the confidence to put forward ideas and develop resilience and self-reliance from an early age. They will ponder on problems, refer back to earlier work and ask each other before seeking help from the teacher. Challenging tasks and questions ensure that the most able are fully stretched.  The work in students’ books confirms that they make very good progress

p.3

Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics

and corrections to their work show that they are learning well from their mistakes.

p.3

Areas for improvement

The visit has identified no areas for improvement that are not already being addressed effectively.

p.3

Areas for improvement

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement

As explained previously, this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion