Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Nov 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lesley Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lesley Cox

  • Postcode verified

    E9 6HB

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesuccessfulimprovedsafestrongstronglyimprovingconsistently
Criticismseriouspoorinconsistenciestoo slowconcernsexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,068
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 95%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Mr Steve Gleason Headteacher Berger Primary School Anderson Road Hackney London E9 6HB

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 5 November, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. Following a monitoring visit in January 2014, the school was judged to be taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

This inspection was carried out in response to a complaint made to Ofsted. A serious incident that occurred at the school since the previous monitoring visit is being investigated by the governing body. During this inspection the effectiveness of the school’s safeguarding arrangements were evaluated according to the School inspection handbook (September 2014).

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

strengthen communication links so that parents know how the school is supporting the learning of their children and keeping them safe Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com update the school’s child protection policy to better reflect the Keeping children safe in education guidance, issued by the Department for Education (DfE)in April 2014.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and the deputy headteacher, a group of senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since my last visit. I scrutinised school improvement documents and inspected safeguarding arrangements.

p.2

Context

Since the last monitoring visit the school has appointed three assistant headteachers. One new classroom teacher joined the school in September 2014 to fill an existing vacancy.

p.2

Main findings

The school action plan is now more sharply focussed on the areas for improvement identified in the inspection report from October 2013. Timescales and monitoring roles have been added. Governors, leaders and teachers use the action plan as a central document to help them check the progress that is being made towards improvements. Leaders have a thorough understanding of which interventions are helping the school improve. They check the impact of new actions robustly. For example, they check how successful teaching interventions have been by asking teachers to provide regular evaluations of successful learning activities.

p.2

Main findings

Your senior leadership team has been strengthened by the appointment of three assistant headteachers with specific areas of responsibility. This has created extra time for you and your deputy to plan further improvements and hold all leaders strongly to account for meeting targets. All senior leaders, including you, have a regular teaching commitment and can model effective teaching strategies. As a result, the quality of teaching and learning is improving throughout the school.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ attainment in 2014 improved overall but inconsistencies in the achievement of different groups and subjects remain. Key Stage 2 pupils achieved more highly in writing and mathematics than they did in reading. Raising reading standards throughout the school remains a priority. To address this leaders are reviewing how reading is taught. A new library is being developed and a number of cross-curricular reading initiatives are planned. Teachers plan and evaluate their lessons to check that learning activities are pitched at the correct level. When individual rates of progress are too slow this is recognised and appropriate adjustments made. More able pupils are provided with activities that help them make accelerated rates of progress and encourage high levels of engagement.

p.2

Main findings

You have worked hard to improve communication with parents by holding question and answer sessions to address any concerns and keep them well informed about improvements at the school. Parents know who to contact so that any worries are addressed as quickly as possible. They have received advice to help them read with their children and guidance about how to keep their children safe when using the internet at home.

p.3

Main findings

Behaviour and safety are continuing to improve as new policies and procedures become firmly embedded. For example, the behaviour policy is now applied consistently by all staff across the school. Exclusions increased last year, as a result of new procedures to address poor behaviour, but have reduced significantly this term. The number of reported behaviour incidents has also reduced. Attendance has improved and is now above average.

p.3

Main findings

Safeguarding arrangements meet statutory requirements. The leadership and management of safeguarding are effective. Leaders have ensured that necessary checks are made on all adults working at the school who have unsupervised access to pupils. The school has appropriate systems for monitoring and supporting vulnerable pupils, as evidenced by its detailed and well maintained care plans. Child protection and first aid training has been undertaken by staff and updated at the required intervals. However, the school’s child protection policy needs to be updated to reflect the new statutory guidance that was issued by the Department for Education (DfE) in April this year.

p.3

Main findings

The governing body holds school leaders to account for the improvements that need to be made. Immediate action was taken by governors following the recent serious incident. They have commissioned an external investigation, which was taking place at the time of this monitoring visit.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority continues to provide strong support to the school. They hold leaders and governors to account for making rapid improvements. The regular Trust Action Group (TAG) meetings review the progress being made and are attended by school leaders, including governors. A teaching and learning review was carried out in June 2014 to support leaders with improving the school. This rightly confirmed that the school is continuing to improve. As a result, the level of external monitoring has been reduced and the school improvement partner now makes termly visits. New senior leaders and the governing body have received effective support to help them become more confident in their monitoring roles. The local authority provided immediate support to help the school manage the recent serious incident. They have helped governors to appointment an independent consultant to carry out the external investigation.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hackney.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion