Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Nov 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Edwards

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Edwards

  • Postcode verified

    DT3 4AT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivemake good progressclearlyconsistentlyimprovedeffectivelyconfidentclear
Criticismseriouslyyet tounclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
819
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Miss J Harris Headteacher Chickerell Primary Academy Rashley Road Chickerell Weymouth DT3 4AT

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your school on 5 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Academy

 introduce a timeline alongside the school action plan which clearly identifies when actions are to be completed and where support will be provided.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit I met with you, your senior and middle leaders and representatives from the governing body to discuss the actions taken since the most recent inspection. Together we carried out brief visits to lessons, and spoke with pupils. Tribal Kings Orchard, One Queen Street, Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email : suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com The current school improvement plan was evaluated and a telephone conversation was held with your school improvement partner.

p.1

Main findings

You acknowledge the inspection was a catalyst that brought about an increased drive and passion from staff to improve outcomes for all pupils. Since the inspection you have worked determinedly to bring about consistently good teaching throughout the school. This focus is already beginning to show improved rates of progress for pupils in Key Stage 2 as teachers take more care in planning their lessons. Your recent checks on teaching confirm there is a greater consistency in the way teachers give pupils regular opportunities to take responsibility for their learning. Our joint visits to lessons showed teachers are giving pupils work that more closely matches their learning needs. All staff have raised their expectations of what pupils are capable of achieving as a result of the training teachers have received following the inspection. You have begun to adapt the school development plan to include the

p.2

Main findings

recommendations made in the inspection report. A timeline which clearly identifies when actions are to be completed and where support for staff will be provided has yet to be completed. Consequently staff, governors and parents are unclear about how much progress the school is making.

p.2

Main findings

You have begun to train and support staff to improve the quality of marking across the school. However, this is at a very early stage of implementation. School leaders have reviewed the curriculum to ensure appropriate attention is given by teachers to developing pupils’ core skills in as many subjects as possible. You have introduced a new planning format for teachers to ensure they make clear in their planning pupils’ learning targets. Leaders confirm this strategy is helping teachers to provide more effectively for the wide range of pupils’ learning needs. Careful checking on the achievements of the school’s most vulnerable pupils shows these pupils are continuing to make good progress.

p.2

Main findings

The governors who met with me say the effective communication channels within the school enable them to remain well informed about the work and progress of the school. They particularly appreciate your detailed and regular headteacher reports. They say these help governors to ask insightful questions of leaders as well as support the school. Governors take their responsibility to monitor yours and your staff’s well-being seriously. They ensure appropriate systems are in place to manage and check on teachers’ workload. The inspection has renewed governors’ determination to check how well they are challenging school leaders and checking the school’s work. For example, they have looked at ways to make the minutes of their meetings clearer to provide evidence that they hold leaders robustly to account. Governors have also completed an audit to identify skills and training needs which will also be used to guide them when the time comes to appoint new

p.2

Main findings

members. A full review of the governing body has been arranged for later in the term.

p.2

External support

The school is wisely drawing on the expertise of external partners, including a self evaluation partner and expert practitioners from other schools. For example, the school is currently receiving support to improve the quality of phonics teaching. As an academy the school also buys into a range of support services provided by the local authority. Currently, governors are receiving support and training from the local authority in order to become more confident in their roles and in holding the school to account.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Dorset.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion