Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Steve Isherwood
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 920
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566933 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: ggleaden@cfbt.com
p.1
Miss Rachel Smart Headteacher Park Road Junior Infant and Nursery School Park Road Batley West Yorkshire WF17 5LP
p.1
and Nursery School, Kirklees
Following my visit to your school on 4 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
and Nursery School, Kirklees
The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
and Nursery School, Kirklees
Senior leaders and governors are now taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
and Nursery School, Kirklees
maintain the focus on improving the quality of teaching to accelerate pupils’ progress further, particularly for the most able
p.1
and Nursery School, Kirklees
press ahead with plans to share key principles of effective practice in teaching and learning.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior and middle leaders, pupils, the Chair of the Governing Body, a group of teachers and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection and my first monitoring visit. The school improvement plan was evaluated. We visited lessons together.
p.1
Context
Since my last visit, there have been major changes to the governing body with the appointment of a new chair and vice chair. Two teachers have left and the leadership team has been strengthened with the appointment of an assistant headteacher with responsibility for key stage 2.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have reacted positively to the recommendations of the first monitoring visit. The independent review of governance has been completed, the school improvement plan has been improved, procedures for monitoring the quality of teaching have been tightened and staff have received relevant training to improve their practice.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils’ current achievement appears to be strengthening as a result of improvements in the quality of teaching. Evidence from pupils’ work and the school’s own data points to some pupils catching up and making better progress than previously. This better picture has come about because senior leaders have introduced several new strategies to boost pupils’ achievement which in turn are leading to improvements in classroom practice. The regular reviews of how pupils are achieving are empowering staff to track the progress of pupils more effectively and plan appropriate support for those pupils who are in danger of falling behind. The monitoring of lessons by leaders has been tightened and now focuses more accurately on the achievement of groups of pupils and whether they are sufficiently challenged in their work. In addition, staff have started to agree some key principles of effective practice in teaching and learning. However, senior leaders are correct in
p.2
Main findings
recognising they need to press on with this approach and share good practice more widely across the school.
p.2
Main findings
Nevertheless, in spite of these recent improvements, the end of year data for those pupils who left the school in July 2014 does not indicate an improving trend. The school did not meet the floor standards set by the Secretary of State for education. These pupils did not do as well as their peers nationally, too few reached the higher levels because not enough pupils made better than expected progress, particularly in mathematics. This picture clearly represents the legacy of underachievement, the downside to staffing turbulence and weak provision in the past. Senior leaders are acutely aware that the key to resolving this issue lies in maintaining the focus on improving the quality of teaching to accelerate pupils’ progress further, particularly for the most able.
p.2
Main findings
Governance has become sharper-edged. New appointments, in a relatively short period of time have brought a sense of urgency to improving the school. Their early actions are demonstrating a clear understanding of the school’s most pressing priorities and a resolve to challenge senior leaders and hold them to account.
p.2
Main findings
Effective steps have been taken to develop the skills of middle leaders in checking on the quality of teaching, tracking the progress of pupils more accurately and planning appropriate intervention for pupils where necessary. As a group, they are increasing their potential to impact more effectively on school improvement. Pupils’ behaviour and their readiness to learn are strengthening further. They say that their lessons are getting better and more exciting. They report that behaviour in class is much improved with hardly any lessons now affected by low- level disruption.
p.2
Main findings
Whilst taking some pride in recent improvements following the previous monitoring visit, the school still has some ground to make up. All parties recognise that much further work is required on the journey to becoming a good school.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority continues to provide an appropriate level of support and challenge to the school. On-going work through specialist consultants alongside the work of school improvement officers is proving beneficial in building the confidence of staff and in improving provision.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Kirklees.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion