Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Nov 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Phil Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Phil Smith

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingimprovingeffectiveimprovedsuccessfuleffectivelyconsistentsecure
Criticismbelownot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
932
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jbennett@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Alison Rahman Headteacher Long Toft Primary School Church Road Stainforth Doncaster South Yorkshire DN75AB

p.1

School, Doncaster

Following my visit to your school on 4 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Doncaster

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Doncaster

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Doncaster

 revise the improvement plan so that it is more helpful in assisting school leaders to check the implementation and measure the impact of agreed actions  ensure the most able pupils have appropriately challenging work, especially in mathematics, and all teachers have a consistent approach to improving spelling, punctuation and grammar.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and your deputy headteacher. Together we undertook a brief tour of the school and visited classrooms and sampled some of the work pupils had done. I met with two members of the governing body, subject coordinators and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I also evaluated the school development plan and other monitoring evidence including performance management targets, lesson observation records, minutes from recent governing body meetings and the single central record.

p.2

Context

Since the last inspection there is one new teacher in the Foundation Stage and new teachers in Year 1 and Year 3.

p.2

Main findings

Following the inspection both staff and governors were upset and disappointed that the school went from being good to requiring improvement. However you have worked quickly to get staff and governors to accept this. Staff with whom I spoke showed a real determination to get back to being at least a good school.

p.2

Main findings

No time has been wasted in getting staff to see for themselves the variability in marking. You have empowered them to suggest ways in which marking and feedback could be improved. In partnership with staff you have rapidly established a set of non-negotiables aimed at improving teaching, marking and feedback. Staff with whom I met told me they feel their views are valued and as a result are highly motivated to see the school improve.

p.2

Main findings

There were early signs during our visits to classrooms that feedback to pupils has started to improve. Pupils are starting to benefit from timetabled reflection times each day which is allowing them to respond to teacher comments. We did agree that there were still occasions when the most able pupils could make faster progress, especially in mathematics and as yet there is not a consistent approach to improving pupils spelling, punctuation and grammar.

p.2

Main findings

After the staffing turbulence in Key Stage 1 last year, you conveyed a sense that more stable staffing and better teaching has helped the school reach a turning point. You have sensibly directed your deputy headteacher to support staff in Key Stage 1 to help secure the anticipated improvement.

p.2

Main findings

Since the inspection the governing body has changed considerably. A number of long standing governors have left and been replaced with willing but less experienced members. They are at an early stage in their development but have already demonstrated a willingness to challenge and ask pertinent questions about pupils’ achievement. You have recognised the need to develop the confidence and role of governors and have been successful in securing a National Leader of Governance for at least the next 12 months to be a member of the governing body to support, model and help other governors develop rapidly in their roles.

p.2

Main findings

The school development plan does address each of the key priorities arising from the inspection. However to increase the potential of the plan to support rapid improvement greater attention is needed to having clearer timescales for when and how specific features of teaching will improve alongside measurable targets. The plan would also benefit from greater clarity around who is responsible for checking the actions have the intended impact, with more opportunity to include governors and middle leaders in this work.

p.3

External support

Following the inspection the local authority senior standards and effectiveness officer has either directly provided or brokered support in a timely fashion. This includes planned reviews of the provision in Early Years later this month and a review of governance early next year. The local authority has currently judged that the school has sufficient capacity to improve, as the headteacher has been a local leader in education and so chosen not to partner the school with a good or outstanding school. The senior standards and effectiveness officer is now a member of the newly created school improvement committee and the intention is for him to model for governors ways of challenging leaders effectively. It is too soon to evaluate the impact of this initiative.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Doncaster and as below.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion