Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Nov 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clare Cossor

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clare Cossor

  • Postcode verified

    LE15 6GY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+88Very positivemore positive than 91% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelymake good progressskilleddelightskilfulclearindependent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings532w+87
  • What needs to improve342w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
874
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%What needs to improve 39%

Full report text

Mr Ashley Scott Acting Headteacher The Parks School Oakham CofE Primary School and The Parks School Burley Oakham LE15 6GY

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Parks School

Following my visit to your school on 12 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Parks School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Parks School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to The Parks School

 ensure that ‘next steps’ for children’s learning are linked more closely to teachers’ observations and that they are reviewed on a more regular basis  simplify the presentation of assessment data so that information is clearer and easier for all members of staff and governors to understand and respond to.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the acting headteacher, senior leaders, two members of the governing body and two representatives from the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last monitoring inspection. I evaluated Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com the school’s plans for improvement and looked at planning documents and profiles of children’s achievement. I observed a range of teaching and learning activities with the acting headteacher. These included small groups and one-to-one activities both inside the setting and outside.

p.1

Context

Since the first monitoring inspection, the previous headteacher has left and the deputy headteacher has become acting headteacher of the two federated schools (Oakham Church of England Primary School and The Parks School). The senior leadership team for The Parks School has been restructured and there is a new lead teacher and two new nursery nurses.

p.2

Main findings

You are leading the staff team with insight and dynamism and building effectively on the work of the previous headteacher. As a result, the staff team has a far greater knowledge of the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage framework. They are now providing a much better balance between activities led by adults and children’s independent play. Staff are more skilled in enabling children to learn more for themselves through active investigations and exploratory play. For example, one girl with complex communication needs was able to delight in exploring the ‘mud kitchen’ independently outside. The teaching assistant used a skilful combination of key words and signs to describe what she was doing. After a sustained period of meaningful play, the little girl gave the teaching assistant eye contact and requested ‘more’ in order that she could have some more water.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders and teachers are continuing to improve systems for planning. As a result, the setting now provides an exciting range of suitable activities which are enabling children to make good progress. Weekly and daily plans now effectively identify key activities and next steps for learning. However, these next steps are not reviewed frequently enough and are not linked closely enough to the regular observations which staff record in order to make teaching as effective as it could be.

p.2

Main findings

The acting headteacher has continued to develop systems for tracking the progress of children. Termly meetings ensure that all senior leaders and teachers have a clear view of areas where children are achieving well and those where greater support or challenge is needed. As a result, planning is more closely linked to children’s developmental needs. However, the school does not present data about children’s learning over time clearly enough to enable staff and governors to understand the achievement of individuals and groups easily.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders have worked hard to improve the school’s systems for self-evaluation and they now relate closely to the outcomes for children’s learning. They have made much clearer links between targets on the school improvement plan and performance management targets for staff. The acting headteacher is providing effective challenge to staff through regular observations and informal visits to classes. He is not afraid to have challenging conversations in order to improve the quality of teaching for children.

p.2

Main findings

Governors give effective challenge and support to the headteacher because they visit school regularly and now have a clear understanding of the priorities for school improvement.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The partnership working between the school and the local authority’s Early Years Foundation Stage specialist is continuing to bring about improvements in the overall quality of provision in the nursery. The local authority acknowledges that the pace of improvement has accelerated since The Parks and senior leadership team have been restructured. Guidance relating to improving the quality of children’s play has been particularly effective.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Rutland.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion