Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Clive Moss
- Postcode verified
NG17 2LH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 678
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Robert della-Spina Headteacher John Davies Primary and Nursery School Barker Street Huthwaite Sutton-in-Ashfield NG17 2LH
p.1
and Nursery School
Following my visit to your school on 11 November 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
and Nursery School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
and Nursery School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior leaders, subject coordinators, the Chair of Governors, and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The inspector toured the school, visiting all classrooms, and held discussions with pupils and looked at Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9156 Direct email : emma.norwood@serco.com examples of their work. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Documents relating to the staff recruitment checks carried out by the school were scrutinised.
p.1
Main findings
Both senior leaders and other members of staff with leadership responsibilities are now better organised and more focussed than previously on bringing about necessary improvements at the school. They are much more systematic in checking on the quality of teaching and providing information to the staff more frequently, to bring about improvements.
p.2
Main findings
A detailed action plan was prepared promptly after the inspection and covers all of the areas for improvement from the inspection. It includes a good range of relevant professional development opportunities to enable the staff to develop the required skills and understanding.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body is now obtaining more information for itself directly from visits to the school and meetings with relevant members of staff. A review of governance was instigated before the inspection took place and has now been completed. The governing body has reconstituted, as a result of the review, and is putting into action planned changes to its ways of working.
p.2
Main findings
The teachers are beginning to have higher expectations of what the pupils can achieve and to plan work for the pupils accordingly. It was apparent, however, through conversations with the pupils that the work set is still not always at the right level.
p.2
Main findings
A systematic approach to marking the pupils work has been introduced and is being used by all of the staff. The pupils understand the marking scheme and are finding it helpful in improving their work. The teachers use the marking to push the pupils’ learning further, routinely requiring them to make amendments, or corrections.
p.2
Main findings
The teachers are placing noticeable emphasis on extending the pupils’ vocabulary, both within lessons and through a range of materials on display in and around classrooms. They do not, however, exploit question and answer sessions within lessons sufficiently to develop the pupils’ speaking skills, including their use of vocabulary.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school has benefited from a close and effective working partnership with the local authority education improvement adviser. The work carried out is leading to improvements in leadership and management and in the quality of teaching. The school is working in partnership with another school to provide professional development opportunities for the staff and makes contact with schools outside of the local area, in order to find particular expertise, when needed. Senior leaders are also identifying other sources of support themselves and using them effectively to support improvements.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Nottinghamshire.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
cc. Chair of the Governing Body cc. Local authority
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion