Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Nov 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Catherine Leahy

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Catherine Leahy

  • Postcode verified

    GL7 6PE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+70Positivemore positive than 69% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovingcleareffectiveconsistentlypositiveskilledprecisely
Criticismgapsnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings638w+65
  • What needs to improve332w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
970
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 66%What needs to improve 34%

Full report text

Mrs Margaret Gwynne Rodmarton School Rodmarton Cirencester Gloucestershire GL7 6PE

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rodmarton School

Following my visit to your school on 6 November, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rodmarton School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rodmarton School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rodmarton School

 ensure the school action plan states precisely how and when leaders, including governors, will check that actions taken are improving pupils’ achievement and progress.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, the Chair and vice-chair of the Governing Body, other governors, the subject leader for English and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I undertook a ‘focused tour’ of the school, and looked at work in pupils’ books with you and a governor. I evaluated the school action plan. In addition, I scrutinised a range of Tribal Kings Orchard 1 Queens Street Bristol, BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com school documentation which included: achievement information, teachers’ planning and minutes of governing body meetings. I checked the school’s recruitment record to ensure appropriate checks have been made for new staff.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection in July 2014, one new teacher has joined the school. Another teacher is on maternity leave and her class is being taught by a newly qualified teacher. The school continues to be led and managed by an interim headteacher. A new, permanent headteacher has been appointed for 1 January 2015.

p.2

Main findings

You have acted quickly to tackle the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. You have gained the trust of the staff, governors and the school community. This has enabled you to drive the pace of change rapidly. The school action plan is detailed and shows clear priorities for improvement. You have set challenging targets which you share with staff and governors. This is raising their expectations of what pupils can achieve. Your key focus on improving the quality of teaching is beginning to raise pupils’ achievement. However, the action plan is less clear in setting out how and when your leaders and governors will check your actions are improving pupils’ achievement and progress.

p.2

Main findings

You quickly identified the need to train teachers to accurately check pupils’ achievement and progress. Teachers now have a detailed understanding of what pupils already know and their next steps in learning. As a result, they are using this information to plan work that stretches and challenges pupils. Pupils are clear these challenges are helping them learn at a faster rate. For example, a pupil in Year 6 stated, ‘challenges help me to work harder and learn more’.

p.2

Main findings

You have reviewed the marking policy this term. Work in pupils’ books shows that teachers are now using these guidelines consistently in English and mathematics. Teachers are giving pupils clear guidance, such as using ‘steps to success’ and precise comments on how to improve the quality of their work. The recent focus on teaching handwriting is having a very positive impact on pupils’ presentation. Pupils are taking pride in their work and as a result, they are achieving at a faster rate.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders and governors have focused sharply on improving the quality of teaching in mathematics. With your guidance, teachers are becoming skilled at identifying and addressing gaps in pupils’ knowledge and understanding. In order to set standards for good teaching, you have implemented a set of ‘non-negotiable’ expectations for teachers. This is helping them to know how to improve their practice. For example, teachers are questioning pupils effectively to assess their understanding. They then set activities which challenge pupils’ thinking and understanding so less time is lost in lessons. Teachers appreciate the time they have to work together and share their practice. This is helping them develop their knowledge of teaching mathematics effectively. Gaps in pupils’ mathematical skills, knowledge and understanding are beginning to close.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body acted swiftly to appoint a permanent headteacher for January 2015. They also recognised the need to restructure the teaching team. They managed this process smoothly, with you as interim headteacher, in readiness for the start of the academic year. Governors new to their roles are committed to bringing greater levels of challenge to school leaders. Following the inspection, they realised they did not know how well pupils were achieving. They have since received training from a governor with relevant expertise. They are now asking increasingly probing questions about the impact of teaching on pupils’ achievement and progress. This is enabling them to hold school leaders to account more effectively.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority is providing good support to you and your staff to help the school move forward. During an unsettled time for the school, they provided an interim headteacher and two experienced governors. This has enabled the school to improve under your leadership. They check frequently that actions taken are improving the school and provide the support needed. For example, they have provided training in teaching mathematics and support for the newly qualified teacher.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Gloucestershire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion