Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Sue Frater
- Postcode verified
PL5 2DW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes15
“Their progress in mathematics remains strong.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,053
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Robin Jones Headteacher St Budeaux Foundation CofE (Aided) Junior School Priestley Avenue Plymouth PL5 2DW
p.1
Foundation CofE (Aided) Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 20 October 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Foundation CofE (Aided) Junior School
The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005
p.1
Foundation CofE (Aided) Junior School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Foundation CofE (Aided) Junior School
make sure that progress in writing is consistently good throughout the school, especially for boys, more able pupils and those with special educational needs develop teachers’ skills in checking pupils’ progress during lessons and adapting the activities, pace and questions to meet the different rates of learning extend subject leaders’ skills to include lesson observation and helpful feedback to staff. Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior and subject leaders, pupils, members of the governing body and representatives from the local authority and teaching school alliance to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. In addition, a telephone call was made to the school improvement partner. The school improvement plan and other key documents, such as information on pupils’ progress, were evaluated. Lessons or part-lessons were observed in seven of the eight classes. Some lessons were jointly observed with the headteacher. Pupils’ books were examined in lessons.
p.2
Main findings
The headteacher has reviewed the roles and responsibilities of the leadership team and this is resulting in a much better focus on improving teaching and learning. Consequently, the quality of teaching is improving. Teachers have high expectations of the pupils and provide lessons that engage and interest them. They are making better use of their assessments to plan work at the right level for the pupils. Due to improvements in the marking of pupils’ books, pupils know how well they are achieving and what to do to improve their work. Not all teachers are checking pupils’ progress during the lesson and adapting the activities, pace and questions to the pupils’ varying levels of understanding. This means the work is often too easy for some pupils and too hard for others. Teaching assistants are beginning to ask questions that help pupils to think for themselves, but this is uneven across the school.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils’ achievement is rising due to the improvements in teaching. Pupils are now making as much progress in reading as they are in mathematics because reading books are matched well to their skills and they are encouraged to read more regularly. Their progress in mathematics remains strong. Progress in writing is not as positive as in the other areas, especially for boys, pupils with special educational needs and the more able, but it is improving. Many pupils enter Year 3 with limited vocabulary and some struggle with spelling and handwriting. Their lessons help them to widen their vocabulary and they are beginning to write more quickly and neatly in a joined style. The pupils are now encouraged to talk about topics before writing and this is helping them, and particularly the boys, to record their ideas. However, classroom displays are not used effectively enough to motivate the pupils or to help them to experiment with their writing. Pupils supported by the pupil
p.2
Main findings
premium are making better progress than others as the school has improved the support they receive.
p.2
Main findings
Pupils continue to behave well in lessons and around the school. They are keen to learn and attend regularly. They say they feel safe in school, that there is little bullying, and they are confident to take any concerns to their teachers. A pupil commented that, ‘It is a very caring school and we accept everyone’. Another said, ‘We interact with different years, like a family’. This was seen to be the case.
p.2
Main findings
Senior and subject leaders are now more rigorously checking the progress of all pupils and this is underpinning the improvements in the school. They identify any underachievement through checking information on pupils’ progress, teachers’ lesson planning and pupils’ books, and provide appropriate support. Subject leaders are not yet carrying out lesson observations, but training has been planned for them. The literacy leader is now making sure that progress in spelling and grammar is being planned across the school, although this is at an early stage. Greater links with the infant school and workshops for parents are also supporting pupils’ progress.
p.3
Main findings
Governance has improved following an external review. Governors are now linked to year groups and subjects. They visit the school regularly. They use a wide range of information, especially relating to pupils’ progress, which enables them to have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for improvement. This helps them to know the questions to ask in holding senior leaders to account for the standards pupils reach. Governors regularly pose questions on the school’s website which the headteacher answers. This increased challenge is helping to improve achievement. Governors manage the school’s finances well and ensure pupil premium and sport funding are helping to raise standards. For example, the introduction of activities such as cheer leading is engaging more girls in sport. They also maintain an overview of teachers’ appraisal, which is now linked more closely to the Teachers’ Standards and pupils’ achievement.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The school is making effective use of a partner school and the local authority, for example in checking the accuracy of its assessments. The support is not extensive as the school is now bringing about the necessary improvements itself.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Plymouth and the Diocese of Exeter.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion