Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Tanya Harber Stuart
- Postcode verified
HU6 9BP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The actions taken since September 2014 have already had a positive impact with the number of fixed-term exclusions falling dramatically as students begin to rise to the high expectations being set. p.2
- There is sense of urgency about TFA and high expectations around what is acceptable behaviour from students and how much progress students should be making. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families3
“This vision is accepted and shared by staff, students and parents.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 825
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Andy Dulson Interim Principal Thomas Ferens Academy 540 Hall Road Hull HU6 9BP
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Thomas Ferens Academy
Following my visit to your school on 22 October 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Thomas Ferens Academy
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in June 2014.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the interim Principal, the consultant Principal, the Chair of the Governing Body and other members of the governing body. Meetings were held with sponsors, including those representing the local authority and Hull University. A meeting was held with other members of the senior leadership team. The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy’s improvement plans were evaluated. A tour of the academy was undertaken.
p.1
Context
Since September 2014 Sirius Academy, Kingston-upon-Hull, has been working very closely with Thomas Ferens Academy (TFA). The interim Principal is seconded from Sirius Academy and started at TFA in September 2014. The Principal of Sirius Academy is the consultant Principal. Numerous staff from Sirius Academy are working in a number of ways to support school improvement at TFA. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com Ten members of staff, including the Principal and business manager, left TFA before the start of the autumn term 2014. Twelve new members of staff joined TFA in September 2014. There are 100 more students on roll, many of these transferred to the academy from Endeavour School in Kingston-upon-Hull, which is in the process
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The interim Principal and consultant Principal, ably supported by the team from Sirius Academy, the sponsors and members of the governing body have put together succinct and robust action plans. These highlight appropriate actions to tackle the weaknesses identified in the section 5 inspection report. The plans include measurable success criteria to help leaders check on the progress of actions they take. These measures provide the potential to allow the sponsors and governing body to challenge TFA, ensure appropriate actions are taken and lead to the intended impact.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The team from Sirius Academy have a clear vision for TFA, at the core of which is students’ success. This vision is accepted and shared by staff, students and parents. There is much work being done with parents to make sure they are fully aware of the changes taking place. There is sense of urgency about TFA and high expectations around what is acceptable behaviour from students and how much progress students should be making. The actions taken since September 2014 have already had a positive impact with the number of fixed-term exclusions falling dramatically as students begin to rise to the high expectations being set. The proportion of students who attend each day is rising steadily and fewer students are now late to school.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Strategies are in place to improve the quality of teaching. Much training took place in September and there is an ongoing programme to improve teaching. Individual students are being tracked to monitor the progress they make and actions are taken when students fall behind. The curriculum was radically altered at the beginning of September and students now have more time learning English and mathematics to enable them to progress successfully to the next stage in their education.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The completed review of governance recommended by the section 5 report highlights clearly the strengths and weaknesses of the governing body. The action plan is achievable and actions have already happened to make the governing body more effective. For example, the number of committees has been reduced. In addition, a planning and monitoring committee now meets every fortnight with TFA to review the impact of actions taken and with the remit to respond swiftly to any slippage or identified lack of impact. The quality of information given to the governing body has improved and, as a result, governors are better informed to hold members of staff to account for the progress made by students.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The review of pupil premium (additional government funding) has taken place and has prompted an action plan to ensure more appropriate spending of the pupil premium money. There is a renewed focus on improving the achievement of students supported by the pupil premium.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The sponsor’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The academy’s improvement plans are fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Having considered all the evidence I strongly recommend that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director, Children, Young People and Family Services for Kingston upon Hull. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion