Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Nov 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marianne Young

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marianne Young

  • Postcode verified

    DN9 2DR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+72Very positivemore positive than 71% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh expectationspreciseclearlyeffectivelyimprovingclear
Criticismvariation

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
849
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Miss J Richardson Headteacher Westwoodside CofE Academy Nethergate Doncaster South Yorkshire DN9 2DR

p.1

Academy, North Lincolnshire

Following my visit to your school on 13 October 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy, North Lincolnshire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy, North Lincolnshire

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Academy, North Lincolnshire

 make the milestones in the joint action plan more precise and to occur at regular intervals so that it can be seen clearly if the planned actions are having the correct impact  ensure that differences in the performance of groups of pupils are clearly known and reflected in lesson plans  ensure that the quality of teaching is good in all subjects and that pupils’ key skills in English and mathematics are used properly in all lessons  identify how effectively the new curriculum is embracing opportunities to promote British values and as a result to identify if additional training is needed. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566857 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jkinsman@cfbt.com

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, your deputy, the Chair and another member of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. During these meetings I evaluated your joint action plan, considered the 2014 national test results and we looked at the performance management targets for the current year. You took me on a tour of the school to observe pupils at work.

p.2

Context

Temporary staff and two teachers left at the end of the summer term. There are four new teachers who took up their appointments on 1 September 2014 in the Nursery, Years 1, 3 and 5. Other members of staff have responsibility for developing how pupils’ work is assessed and improving mathematics in all year groups. The Chair of the Governing Body has stepped down and a new Chair has been appointed. There are still some vacancies on the governing body which are in the process of being filled.

p.2

Main findings

The plans already in place and noted in the s5 inspection report have been developed and refined further taking into account the staff changes which account for half of the classes. Some staff have taken on new responsibilities, you have encouraged them to share your vision for the school and to embrace your high expectations. The way pupils’ books are marked has been changed and pupil planners introduced so that parents can be included. It is however, too early to see the impact of this work. Curriculum changes have begun and it was agreed that you will check how well teachers are teaching different subjects in order to promote British values and to identify if additional training is needed. Performance management targets for teachers are demanding and linked to the progress pupils make. However you recognise that some could be tightened further especially to reflect the variation in performance between some groups of pupils.

p.2

Main findings

The way governors work has been re-organised since the inspection and following the review of governance. Although this review was helpful some key points, for example, the way pupil premium monies and sports funding make a difference, was not considered. Governors are involved in progress meetings but recognise, as you do, the need to make the milestones in the joint action plan more precise in some places. At the moment, it is difficult to make sure whether the actions undertaken are having the intended impact and that the school is moving forward in the right direction and at the required pace. Nevertheless, the governors to whom I spoke, have a clear understanding of how to challenge senior leaders and welcome the open conversations that take place regularly. I may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Staff welcome the developing links with other local schools so that they can visit to observe and share practice. The ‘Ensuring Good’ project run by local authority officers is about to start and therefore it is too early to judge whether it will have the intended impact. However, local authority officers visit regularly and provide effective challenge and support particularly for senior leaders. Their next review of teaching and learning should focus on lessons other than English and mathematics so that they can check the progress all pupils make in these subjects.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for North Lincolnshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion