Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Nixon
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- To ensure the policy is applied consistently and effectively, leaders have increased the frequency and range of their checks. p.2
- Consequently leaders have a clearer understanding where marking is used effectively and where it needs to be improved further. p.2
- This means there are more opportunities for staff to see good and outstanding practice and access appropriate training and support. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 891
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566933 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: ggleaden@cfbt.com
p.1
Mrs Marian Hodgson Headteacher St Philip's Church of England Controlled Primary School Church Road Litherland Liverpool Merseyside L21 8NZ
p.1
England Controlled Primary School, Sefton
Following my visit to your school on 13 October 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
England Controlled Primary School, Sefton
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
England Controlled Primary School, Sefton
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to help governors check and evaluate the impact of actions more effectively by:
p.1
England Controlled Primary School, Sefton
● ensuring the action plan has sufficiently measurable success criteria and milestones
p.1
England Controlled Primary School, Sefton
● collating and presenting the evidence of impact succinctly.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, three representatives of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school action plan was evaluated. In addition, the inspector visited every classroom and was accompanied by the head and assistant headteacher. The focus of these visits was to judge the impact of actions taken to improve the school and to scrutinise work in pupils’ books.
p.1
Context
The governing body is in the process of being reconstituted. Three governors have resigned and have not been replaced.
p.2
Context
Two teachers returned from maternity leave in September 2014. One teacher is currently on long term absence.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors have implemented immediate actions to improve the school. As a result, all staff clearly understood their responsibilities in securing this improvement. The school’s action plan contains appropriate objectives for improvement. However, milestones and success criteria in the plan are not sharp enough in order for governors to check that the plan is working.
p.2
Main findings
Governors who met the inspector were clear about the impact of actions taken. They were also clear about future actions. This is because the headteacher and senior leaders regularly keep them informed. Governors’ awareness is enhanced by their frequent visits to the school to speak with pupils and staff. Governors say, and the inspector agrees, that the collation and presentation of evidence needs improving in order for them to check more precisely.
p.2
Main findings
Following several thorough evaluations, improvements have been made to the school’s marking policy. Senior leaders set clear non-negotiable expectations of teachers. This is resulting in better quality marking and improved guidance for pupils, particularly in English and mathematics. To ensure the policy is applied consistently and effectively, leaders have increased the frequency and range of their checks. Consequently leaders have a clearer understanding where marking is used effectively and where it needs to be improved further. Changes to how the school day is organised means teachers and other adults are now able to provide timely feedback to pupils on how to improve their work and give pupils time to act upon this advice. Pupils’ work shows that this is accelerating their progress.
p.2
Main findings
The revised planning format has eradicated inconsistencies in the style of teachers’ planning. This is leading to improvements in the quality of planning because subject leaders can check it more easily, identify issues earlier and implement appropriate training. As a consequence, the tasks and work set are more accurately matched to what pupils are capable of.
p.2
Main findings
Focused visits to partner schools have provided teachers with opportunities to see good practice and feedback to colleagues what they have learnt. Senior leaders say this is improving the quality of teaching. For instance the better use of working walls is supporting pupils’ learning in English and mathematics with the result that the learning is improving.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders have redeployed teaching assistants effectively in order to maximise their impact on pupils’ learning. Consequently, teaching assistants are better informed about what is expected of them. In addition, they have more opportunity to increase their skills because leaders require them to attend staff meetings and training events. Sharper performance management targets linked directly to pupil’s progress means teaching assistants are now held to account more rigorously. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school makes good use of the effective support the local authority provides. This has included the use of English and mathematics consultants to support improvements in leadership and teaching. Effective links have been established with partner schools and a national leader in education. This means there are more opportunities for staff to see good and outstanding practice and access appropriate training and support.
p.3
External support
The school adviser provides an accurate external view of the school’s progress. The adviser ensures the school has access to the help it needs.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for Sefton and the Diocese of Liverpool.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion