Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dorothy Bathgate

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dorothy Bathgate

  • Postcode verified

    S43 4BS

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+77Very positivemore positive than 78% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveimprovedsuccessfullyeffectivelytimely

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings424w+74
  • What needs to improve275w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
699
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 61%What needs to improve 39%

Full report text

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Mr Martin Edge Headteacher Clowne Junior School King Street Cheterfield S43 4BS

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit to Clowne Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 14 October 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit to Clowne Junior School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement monitoring inspection visit to Clowne Junior School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, the senior leadership team, the literacy subject leader, three representatives of the governing body, a group of pupils and two representatives of the local authority, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I evaluated your plans for improvement. I considered documentation relating to the monitoring of teaching and reviewed your most recent data on pupils’ progress and attainment. We conducted a tour of the school together and visited all classes to see pupils and staff at work. I considered the quality of teachers’ marking.

p.1

Context

Since the recent inspection, you have appointed new subject leaders for literacy and numeracy. You have also had an external review of governance and the use of the pupil premium grant. Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T :0121 679 9154 Direct email : aiden.dunne@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

You, your staff and governors are working with resolute determination to tackle the areas requiring improvement. You have begun to raise expectations of what pupils can achieve through your improved tracking of pupils’ progress. Teachers use this information to plan work that is better matched to the learning needs of all pupils. You have reviewed the school’s approach to the marking of pupils’ work. Pupils talked enthusiastically about the ‘pupil presentation promise’ and shared examples of how teachers’ comments are helping them to improve their work at a faster rate. Pupils’ books showed that they are responding well to increased opportunities to write at length in a broader range of subjects. For example, pupils have recently used their autumn art work as a stimulus for descriptive writing.

p.2

Main findings

Staff are developing a better understanding of what good practice looks like because they have regular opportunities to observe and share the good practice already recognised within the school, as well as through visiting a partner school. There is a strong culture of team work and no-one works in isolation.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders are becoming more involved in checking on the quality of teaching and learning through undertaking lesson observations, checking on work in pupils’ books and checking data on pupils’ progress. They have a sharp focus on how this is contributing to the progress being made by different groups of pupils, particularly middle ability pupils and those supported by the pupil premium.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have used the external review of governance to re-structure their committees. They have begun training to update their skills and knowledge. You are providing them with a good range of information about pupils’ progress and this is helping them to hold you to account. The review of pupil premium spending has increased governors’ awareness of their need to monitor the impact of this provision.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority is providing timely support and challenge to the school. It has successfully brokered the support of a partner school which is effectively supporting senior leaders and staff in making the necessary improvements.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The letter has been copied to the following:

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority – including where the school is an academy

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion