Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Allan Torr
- Postcode verified
SK4 3NG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school. p.3
- As explained previously, this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. p.3
- It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. p.3
- A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 190
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 41, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
20 October 2014 Mr M Shaw Headteacher Tithe Barn Primary School Mauldeth Road Heaton Mersey Stockport SK4 3NG
p.1
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit with Jane Jones HMI on 14 October 2014 to look at work in mathematics.
p.1
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.
p.1
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with you, the deputy headteacher, and the previous and current subject leaders for mathematics; discussions with groups of pupils from Years 5 and 6; observations of teaching in six classes, two conducted jointly with leaders; analysis of a sample of pupils’ work and scrutiny of relevant documentation.
p.1
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
The overall effectiveness of mathematics requires improvement.
p.1
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
Leadership and management of mathematics require improvement.
p.1
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
The school has a track record of good achievement in mathematics. Your analysis of pupils’ attainment and progress has pinpointed where progress is strongest and where it is less strong, for instance in some year groups, in the gap in attainment between disadvantaged pupils and their peers, and in aspects of the achievement of children in the Early Years Foundation Stage. However, this analysis is not reflected in priorities in the improvement plan. The plan identifies some sensible actions, for example, to ensure a smooth transition from one mathematics leader to another and to introduce the new National Curriculum. Checks on the quality of mathematics teaching and on the curriculum are not frequent enough and tend to lack mathematical detail, focusing instead on generic aspects such as presentation and marking. Attention has been given to checking consistency of teachers’ approaches to teaching methods of calculation, but pupils’ mathematical understanding,
p.1
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
their problem solving and reasoning skills have not been monitored nor findings used to identify how teaching might be improved. The role of subject leader is underdeveloped. The leaders do not have a detailed enough grasp on the quality of teaching or its impact on groups of pupils’ achievement. Training for staff on mathematics has been limited, including on the new National Curriculum.
p.2
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
The curriculum in mathematics requires improvement.
p.2
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
Teachers have introduced the new National Curriculum as required into Years 1, 3, 4 and 5. The school has invested in new textbooks and online resources that cover the programmes of study for each year group. However, because pupils are working at above average standards, more discriminating use of the resources is required to ensure pupils are challenged appropriately and have their understanding deepened. Pupils’ written work indicates a lack of focus on developing understanding, reasoning and problem solving, in contrast to the strong emphasis on mathematical knowledge and methods, which enables proficiency. The current practice of working through exercises in the textbook means that not all pupils get to complete the ‘think’ question at the bottom of the text book page or to explain their thinking. Likewise, the problems in the text book page are often directly linked to the methods pupils have just learnt,
p.2
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
which provides practice, but means they do not have to think hard enough mathematically about how to solve the problem. Few Early Years Foundation Stage activities, particularly outdoors, relate to shape, space and measures, for example, to support children’s problem solving with and understanding of patterns, shapes, capacity and mass.
p.2
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
Teachers create a positive atmosphere in mathematics lessons which means pupils are keen to learn and not afraid to ask questions or have a go at a new method or tackling a newly presented formula. Teaching is particularly successful in developing pupils’ proficiency in calculating and recalling mathematical knowledge. Teachers generally make good use of pupils’ errors and misconceptions as teaching points in lessons. They mark pupils’ work frequently and some give enough time for pupils to respond to their marking and to improve their work, good practice the school intends to develop further. Most teachers monitor their class effectively to check on how well pupils are working and to spot difficulties. They adapt the pace of lessons to ensure pupils have completed work correctly before moving on to the next idea or method. However, they do not move pupils on quickly enough through repetitive exercises in the new textbooks. Good questioning
p.2
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
encourages pupils to use and learn new mathematical vocabulary. Achievement in mathematics is good.
p.2
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
Across the school, pupils attain standards in mathematics that are above the national average. They make good progress so that, by the time they leave Year 6, almost every pupil has attained the level they should for their age and more than half attain the higher levels. Pupils’ progress last academic year was particularly good in Years 5 and 6. Pupils are numerate and skilled at mental and written calculations. They have a secure understanding of the number system, counting, and the four rules of calculation. Boys and girls achieve similarly well and most pupils with special educational needs make good progress. The small number of pupils whose circumstances make them disadvantaged achieve fairly well but not as well as the rest of the class. This gap is not closing quickly. Children’s knowledge of counting and number is above average by the end of Reception. Fewer children excel in their knowledge and understanding
p.3
Ofsted 2014–15 subject survey inspection programme: mathematics
of shape, space and measures, in part because of a lack of resources and challenging activities, particularly outdoors. Your plans to refurbish and improve the outdoor space are timely.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
improving subject leadership of mathematics by introducing more frequent and comprehensive checks on pupils’ mathematical understanding and using the outcomes to improve the quality of teaching and the curriculum adjusting the curriculum so that it meets the needs of all pupils and places a greater focus on developing pupils’ understanding, reasoning and ability to solve problems making sure that children in the Early Years Foundation Stage have plenty of chances in the outdoor area to solve problems and reach high standards, particularly in shape, space and measures closing the gap in mathematics attainment between pupils whose circumstances make them disadvantaged and their peers.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop mathematics in the school.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:
As explained previously, this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. A copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion