Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mary Rayner
- Postcode verified
LU1 4JD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff listen to pupils read regularly but do not record pupils’ specific difficulties which means that teachers are not always aware of what needs to be addressed, for example, which particular blends or sounds pupils are struggling with. p.2
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- Pupils get regular feedback on what they need to do to improve their work. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance13
“The school improvement partner provides high-quality challenge to the leadership team.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 957
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Sue Teague Caddington Village School Five Oaks Caddington Luton LU1 4JD
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 7 October 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June and 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders, governors and the local authority are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
ensure that as the school forms a federation with Slip End Lower School, its governance arrangements are clear and provide robust, strategic oversight improve teaching and learning by: developing a more systematic method of monitoring pupils’ progress in reading monitoring the progress of pupils carefully, particularly following interventions, in order to judge the impact on pupils’ achievement. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders, the Chair of Governors and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement and local authority action plans were evaluated. I looked at the school’s data on pupils’ attainment and progress, and a range of key documents, including the new marking and behaviour policies. Accompanied by you, I spent time in a wide range of lessons looking at pupils’ work.
p.2
Context
A review of governance has taken place. Governors have taken the decision to formally federate the school with Slip End Lower School. A new governing body will be formed to oversee governance in both schools. These changes are being well supported by the local authority.
p.2
Context
The senior leadership team has been strengthened with the addition of a deputy headteacher. A member of your leadership team is currently acting as the headteacher of Slip End Lower School.
p.2
Main findings
When read in conjunction with the local authority plan, the school improvement plan is detailed, thorough, and focused on the things that matter most. It is a clear response to the most recent inspection report. The senior leadership team are rightly focussing staff attention on these priorities.
p.2
Main findings
Those with responsibility for different key stages have carried out new baseline assessments of all pupils. This data has been checked for accuracy and moderated against other schools. As a result, you are now more confident that the information you have about the achievement of pupils is correct.
p.2
Main findings
Your new marking policy is having an impact. Pupils get regular feedback on what they need to do to improve their work. They understand the marking system and how they can gain from it. Year 2 pupils were able to explain this to me very clearly. However, some pupils are not being given time to respond to this improved marking, and so are not getting the full benefit of it.
p.2
Main findings
Very detailed monitoring of pupils’ work highlights those pupils who are falling behind. Middle leaders hold regular meetings to plan support for and discuss the progress of these pupils. The rigorous scrutiny of all pupils work means that the school has very good information about what pupils are learning and the achievement of all pupils.
p.2
Main findings
Staff listen to pupils read regularly but do not record pupils’ specific difficulties which means that teachers are not always aware of what needs to be addressed, for example, which particular blends or sounds pupils are struggling with. The opportunity to reinforce pupils learning of phonics is missed.
p.2
Main findings
The leadership team, in consultation with staff, have designed and implemented a new curriculum. This is well planned and pupils’ progression in learning through the school is evident. It was clear on our walk around school that pupils are engaged and enjoying the new teaching strategies, many of which are part of research projects being carried out in the school. An example of this is the two classrooms which have display-free walls as ‘learning zones’ where pupils engage with the activity creating a display reinforcing their learning during the lesson. This innovative work is being monitored carefully and its impact will be shared with staff. Pupils were clearly enjoying their learning in these spaces.
p.3
Main findings
Pupils have helped to lead work to change the behaviour policy. This is centred on a ‘praise and consequence ladder’. Pupils understand this simple system and respond well to it. It helps them to develop their sense of right and wrong, and supports your work on developing the social, moral, spiritual and cultural aspects of your pupils.
p.3
Main findings
The school is improving rapidly and is successfully addressing the areas for development identified at the last inspection.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted will carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
Since the last inspection, the local authority has increased the level of support provided to the school which the school values. This includes a wide range of actions, including brokering support from other schools and training for staff. The school improvement partner provides high-quality challenge to the leadership team. The local authority also carried out the review of governance and continues to support the governing body as it moves to federate with another school.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Central Bedfordshire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion