Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joan Hewitt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Hewitt

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivevery wellmake good progressstrongconsistentlyeffectivelyimprovedprecise
Criticismlacksconcernsseriouslynot make good progresstoo manynot clearnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
958
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566933 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: ggleaden@cfbt.com

p.1

Miss Celia Oates Headteacher Branton St Wilfrid's Church of England Primary School Valley Drive Branton Doncaster South Yorkshire DN3 3NB

p.1

Church of England Primary School, Doncaster

Following my visit to your school on 25 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Church of England Primary School, Doncaster

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Church of England Primary School, Doncaster

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Church of England Primary School, Doncaster

tweak the school’s action and development plans to make sure the whole school community understands the improvements leaders expect to see at interim checks  make sure pupils, especially the most able, are consistently challenged by their work and develop resilience  improve the quality of teachers comments on pupils’ written work so that they are more precise about what pupils have done well and what they need to do next to improve their learning  eliminate the remaining instances of pupils chatting when they should be working  further develop leaders’ skills in checking on the quality of the school’s work and using the information to secure improvements  plan how and when leaders will take on more of the responsibilities currently undertaken by the Executive Headteacher  continue to improve communication and relationships with parents.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, the Executive Headteacher and other senior leaders. I spoke formally to a small group of pupils and informally to others during lunchtime. I also met with members of the governing body and representatives of the local authority. I evaluated the school’s action and development plans. I toured the school with you and the Executive Headteacher. During the tour we made brief visits to lessons and looked at pupils’ books.

p.2

Context

An Executive Headteacher has been appointed to support the school for two days a week. Three teachers, including one senior leader have left the school and three teachers have taken up their posts.

p.2

Main findings

With support from the Executive Headteacher, you have secured permanent teachers and strengthened the senior leadership team. This has given leaders more time to check on the quality of teaching and pupils’ work. Middle and senior leaders regularly watch lessons and check pupils’ work and they are using their findings more effectively to bring about improvements. For example, the recent results show that more pupils in Year 6 last year made the progress expected for their age. However, there are still not enough pupils who make good progress.

p.2

Main findings

In lessons, pupils are clear about how they are expected to behave and say teachers are more consistent in insisting they catch up if they do not complete all their work in the lesson. However, some pupils report that there are still occasions when their learning is disrupted by a few pupils who chat rather than concentrating on their work.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers have raised their expectations of pupils and work is more demanding. There are more frequent examples of most able pupils being offered extra challenges to help them deepen their understanding and improve their mastery of important skills. However, this is not consistent and there are still occasions when pupils are required to practice skills they have already grasped. For example, pupils’ work in their mathematics books shows they have done too many similar calculations instead of trying a more difficult set of numbers.

p.2

Main findings

Marking has improved and teachers have made a concerted effort to offer pupils comments on what they have done well and what they need to do next to improve their work. Some teachers do this very well and pupils respond to their comments and make good progress, but again this lacks consistency. For pupils in some classes the teachers’ comments are not clear enough. For example, pupils are asked to, ‘take care with punctuation’ but because the teacher has not explained what element of punctuation needs attention, pupils continue to make the same mistakes.

p.2

Main findings

The schools’ action and development plans are appropriate and leaders have identified when they will check on progress. However, there is not enough clarity about what exactly they will look for at these interim checks. This makes it difficult for leaders and governors to know what they should expect to see. Governors continue to provide the school with a sound level of challenge and support. They take an active role in checking on improvements. They have ensured parents get regular newsletters and check that complaints are dealt with quickly. However, some parents remain dissatisfied with the quality of day-to-day communication. Leaders and governors know they need to do more to make sure all parents have confidence that their concerns are taken seriously.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority has been effective in ensuring the school has the support of the Executive Headteacher who has established strong links with the partner school. Consequently, teachers have frequent opportunities to observe good practice and this is leading to better quality teaching.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for Doncaster and the Diocese of Sheffield.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion