Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Serco Inspections (lead), Elizabeth Ferguson, Ian Middleton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Elizabeth Ferguson, Ian Middleton, Serco Inspections

  • Postcode verified

    PE1 5DB

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−26Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedoutstandingimprovingstrongstronglysecureconfidenteffectively
Criticisminadequategapstoo manyweakmissedweaknessesineffectiveinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1156w−35
  • Leadership305w−3

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,459
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 77%Leadership 20%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Vicki Redhead Acting Headteacher Bishop Creighton Primary School Vineyard Road Peterborough PE1 5DB

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Bishop Creighton Academy

Following my visit with Elizabeth Ferguson, Additional Inspector, to your academy on 24–25 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s previous monitoring inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Bishop Creighton Academy

The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures in January 2014. The full list of the areas for improvement which were identified during that inspection is set out in the annex to this letter. The monitoring inspection report is attached.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Bishop Creighton Academy

Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time: The academy is not making enough progress towards the removal of special measures. However, the academy’s action plan is now fit for purpose.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Bishop Creighton Academy

Having considered all the evidence, I strongly recommend that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Bishop Creighton Academy

This letter and monitoring inspection report will be published on the Ofsted website. I am copying this letter and monitoring inspection report to the Secretary of State, Chair of the Governing Body and Director of Children’s Services for Peterborough.

p.1

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0121 679 9158 Direct email : rachel.dayan@serco.com

p.1

place in January 2014

 Eliminate inadequate teaching in Key Stages 1 and 2, and increase the proportion that is good or outstanding, so that pupils make faster progress by: - improving pupils’ knowledge and skills in spelling, punctuation, grammar and number work - improving the early reading (phonics) skills of pupils in Key Stage 1, and plugging the gaps in the phonic knowledge of older pupils - giving pupils more opportunities to use and improve their literacy and numeracy skills in subjects other than English and mathematics - making sure that pupils improve their work by acting on the guidance teachers provide when they mark their work - making sure that pupils are ready to learn and concentrate well throughout lessons.

p.2

place in January 2014

 Improve leadership and management and increase the capacity of leaders to secure necessary improvement by: - increasing the number of staff available to share leadership tasks, including the leading of provision for disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs - building on the work already started to hold teachers to account for the progress made by their pupils - making sure that leaders and governors are trained to analyse the data collected about pupils’ attainment and progress to eliminate the underachievement of all groups, including disabled pupils, those who have special educational needs and those supported by pupil premium funding.

p.2

place in January 2014

An external review of governance, to include an evaluation of the school’s use of pupil premium, should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved.

p.2

Evidence

During this inspection, inspectors held meetings with the acting headteacher, staff, pupils and the head of school improvement for Peterborough. They spoke with parents and carers, and held telephone discussions with two governors, including the Chair of the Governing Body. Inspectors observed teaching throughout the academy and reviewed pupil progress data, safeguarding documentation, curriculum plans and other documentation, including the academy’s action plan for improvement.

p.3

Context

Since the last visit, three teachers have left the academy. Four classes are taught by temporary or part-time staff. A new inclusion leader started at the beginning of term. The substantive deputy headteacher remains acting headteacher, without a deputy headteacher. The academy is scheduled to join the Greenwood Dale Trust group of sponsored academies from January 2015.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

Too many pupils at the academy are making insufficient progress. This includes disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs. Although pupils attained higher standards in reading, writing and mathematics in 2014 than the pupils tested in 2013, standards remain well below those reached nationally. Those pupils eligible for the pupil premium funding continue to make less progress than other pupils at the academy, particularly in reading and writing. Since the start of term, pupils are benefiting from better-quality writing displayed around the academy which is making the standards expected clearer to pupils.

p.3

Achievement of pupils at the school

Although more children in Reception met the national standards expected of five- year-olds in 2014, literacy skills remain a weaker area of their development. Pupils’ knowledge of phonics (the sounds that letters make) in Year 1 is low and not improving. In Year 2, the gaps in pupils’ reading skills are starting to be plugged. However, not enough pupils are practising the skills they are learning in lessons to become confident independent readers. This slows their learning in other subjects. Pupils’ progress improved in mathematics. More pupils in Year 6 reached or exceeded expectations. However, their ability to apply mathematical skills remains weak, including in subjects such as science.

p.3

The quality of teaching

Although staff manage behaviour and lesson activities more effectively, there is too much dependence upon computer or book resources to engage all pupils, particularly those who find learning difficult. As a consequence, although most pupils do what they are asked, their progress is slow. Lesson pace relies more on the energy and enthusiasm of staff than on the active participation of the pupils. There are missed opportunities to motivate pupils by making the relevance of the lesson to everyday life clearer, or by making links between pupils’ learning in different subjects or topics.

p.3

The quality of teaching

Staff are giving pupils better feedback in lessons and through their marking. This includes additional challenges for pupils who find the work easy, and guidance about how to correct work for those who make mistakes. However, not enough attention is given to pupils’ responses. Too many pupils start their next piece of work before they have fully understood, or corrected, previous work. Inaccurate spellings, untidy handwriting and incomplete work are too often accepted. The quality of classroom discussion similarly includes acceptance of pupils’ first answers, or silence in some cases. By contrast, a class discussion involving Year 6 pupils sustained their interest; every pupil contributed and listened carefully to others.

p.4

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils’ relationships with teachers, additional adults and other children are generally cooperative. Those with behavioural difficulties are learning to control themselves through the additional support they receive in lessons, supported by more clarity about rules and rewards. However, some of the younger pupils are not clear enough about routines, particularly when given opportunities to make choices for themselves. Where older pupils show a lack of concentration, it is because lessons do not attract their interest early enough; for example, by drawing on first-hand experiences.

p.4

Behaviour and safety of pupils

When pupils are inspired, they express interest in lessons and take pride in their work. For example, the Year 5 pupils talk informatively about their history topic and their sense of achievement in seeing written work displayed. Most pupils are able to reflect, express views thoughtfully and show respect for the views of others when expectations of them are sufficiently high.

p.4

Behaviour and safety of pupils

Pupils feel safe and supported at the academy. However, their understanding of potential risks, including those associated with electronic communications or extremism, is very limited.

p.4

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The acting headteacher continues to provide stability and direction during a long period of uncertainty in terms of leadership. However, there is not a strong enough leadership team to address the academy’s weaknesses sufficiently quickly. The school is still without a deputy headteacher. The appointment of an inclusion leader is too recent to evaluate the impact. Middle leadership is underdeveloped. In particular, subject leaders are not leading improvements in subject teaching by setting a strong enough example.

p.4

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The use of data to monitor pupils’ progress and hold teachers to account is improving; for example, through pupil progress meetings with individual staff. However, assessment and data are not used systematically enough to ensure that support is sufficiently targeted. An evaluation of pupil premium has not taken place and has not therefore contributed to more judicious use of resources.

p.5

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The governing body is ineffective. Meetings are not frequent enough, well attended, or sufficiently informed by direct and regular involvement in the school to ensure rapid improvement. A review of governance recommended at the inspection in January has not been commissioned. Opportunities have been missed to increase the capacity of the leadership team through more external support. A few individual members are very supportive of the school. However, the strategic role of the governing body is too underdeveloped to maximise their impact.

p.5

External support

Until recently, the school has received little external support. Since the first monitoring visit, support provided by the local authority has proven effective. Work with the acting headteacher to refine the action plan has resulted in a more secure basis for improvement. Focused support in Year 6 has improved some aspects of English teaching. A programme of leadership support to increase the rigour of lesson observation is planned. Staff have started to network with local schools, including sponsored academies already supported by the Greenwood Dale Trust.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion