Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Deborah James (lead), Jane Millward

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deborah James, Jane Millward

  • Postcode verified

    B8 3HG

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−55Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositiveoutstandingsuccessfullystronglyclearimproving
Criticismlackinadequateweaknessesfailsweakineffectivefailedlacks

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings244w0
  • Leadership650w−55

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
892
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 27%Leadership 71%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Razia Ali Acting Principal Nansen Primary School – A Park View Academy Naseby Road Birmingham B8 3HG

p.1

Park View Academy

Following my visit with Lorna Fitzjohn, Regional Director, together with Andrew Cook and Deborah James, Her Majesty’s Inspectors, to your academy on 12 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the academy’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Park View Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures, following the inspection that took place in April 2014.

p.1

Evidence

During this monitoring inspection, meetings were held with the Acting Principal, the senior leadership team, pupils and the board of trustees. A survey of staff was conducted and inspectors scrutinised the 79 returns. Informal discussions were held with parents. Her Majesty’s Inspectors considered the responses to the online Parent View questionnaire. They also made short visits to lessons. The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy’s improvement plan were evaluated. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799164 Direct email : tim.ogbourn@serco.com

p.1

Context

The Acting Principal has been in post since January 2014. The board of trustees and governors in place at the time of the previous inspection have since resigned from the academy and a new board of trustees were appointed on 15 July. The Vice Principal is currently absent from work.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The Acting Principal and senior leadership team have not demonstrated the capacity to improve this academy quickly enough. There is no clear direction or vision of how to address weaknesses. Senior leaders lack an in-depth understanding of the complexities of issues and they are unrealistic about what they need to do.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The new trustees have very recently written a statement of action. They understand that this statement, in its current form, is inadequate. It lacks detail, has not been shared widely and fails to give clear direction to improvement. The academy’s action plan has been rewritten many times. The plan remains weak because it does not include effective monitoring and evaluation procedures. As a result, leaders are not being held to account for their actions. It also remains unclear when actions are to be completed. Consequently, leaders do not know if they are on track with proposed improvements.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy employs 10 Assistant Principals. Their roles and responsibilities are not sharply focused on the right priorities – for example, no one currently holds responsibility for data and achievement. As a result, the leadership of this academy is ineffective.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

During the summer term, the previous trustees and governors failed to hold leaders to account for their work to improve the academy. Valuable time was lost and senior leaders say they saw very little of the trustees over the summer term. The Department for Education worked closely with the academy following the inspection in April 2014. However, the new board of trustees was not appointed until 15 July. The new trustees show a good level of understanding of the significant and complex issues to be addressed.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Senior leaders are working with a range of external partners to deliver aspects of the required improvements. However, there is a lack of clarity about roles and responsibilities and no monitoring of impact. For example, the plan of support from a local outstanding school has been presented as a list of tasks to be completed, with no agreed expectations of impact. With so many partners, leaders are receiving conflicting messages leading to confusion and, in some instances, unhelpful advice. Curriculum plans are beginning to be developed with the help of an educational consultant. Senior leaders have implemented plans for all subjects for the autumn term that provide guidance of what needs to be taught. However, the plans do not go beyond the first term. Longer-term plans lack detail and so there is no clarity to how they will be successfully delivered.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Pupils are positive about how the academy is improving. They are pleased with changes to the building, such as the new canteen. They report that music lessons have been reinstated.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Staff members are generally positive, recognising that improvements are underway. They report feeling more united as a team.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Parents who spoke to the inspectors held mixed views. Although many were positive about the academy, some expressed a lack of confidence in senior leaders.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

 The sponsor’s statement of action is not fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

 The academy’s improvement plan is not fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Having considered all the evidence, I strongly recommend that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Park View Education Trust and the Director of Children’s Services for Birmingham City Council. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board  Local authority – (including where a school is an academy)  For the Secretary of State use the following email address: CausingConcern.SCHOOLS@education.gsi.gov.uk  Contractor providing support services on behalf of the local authority - where appropriate  The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation  The lead inspector

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion