Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Carter

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Carter

  • Postcode verified

    NG8 1QD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverobustrigorouseffectivelyclearprecisesettled
Criticismfalling behindabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
800
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Kate Clifford Southwold Primary School and Early Years' Centre Kennington Road Radford Nottingham NG8 1QD

p.1

School and Early Years' Centre

Following my visit to your school on 22 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School and Early Years' Centre

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School and Early Years' Centre

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School and Early Years' Centre

 ensure that the school’s website contains the required and relevant information to meet statutory requirements.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with senior leaders, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority, to discuss the action taken since the last monitoring inspection. I evaluated your plans for improvement. I reviewed your most recent data relating to pupils’ achievement. I visited each class and considered the quality of pupils’ learning in a range of subjects. I looked at the school’s documentation relating to the safeguarding and attendance of pupils. I looked at the information which the school provides for parents and carers, including that held on its website. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799163 Direct email : lewis.mackie1@serco.com

p.1

Context

Since the first monitoring inspection, two teachers have left the school at the end of the summer term 2014. The governing body has appointed two newly-qualified teachers to teach pupils in Year 4 and Year 5. An experienced teacher has been appointed to teach pupils in Year 3. The three teachers commenced their positions in September 2014. One new member of the governing body has been appointed.

p.2

Main findings

You have kept a closer eye on pupils’ progress by introducing half-termly assessments. This has led to more robust discussions with teachers about each pupil and how well they are doing. Consequently, pupils’ next learning steps are identified for the following half term; pupils who are falling behind are provided with a support programme to help them catch up. Pupils who are doing well are set more challenging targets.

p.2

Main findings

Your visits to lessons are showing that teachers are using this information to set work which is, mostly, set at the right level of difficulty for pupils. Teachers are checking more closely during lessons how well pupils are doing. This is because teachers are asking more precise questions to check on pupils’ understanding as well as to challenge their thinking. This is helping to move learning forward more quickly during lessons and inform the planning of subsequent ones. The combination of these approaches has resulted to improvements in the quality of teaching. This has led to pupils making faster progress in each year group in reading, writing and mathematics.

p.2

Main findings

Governors’ appointment of an attendance officer has helped to raise parents’ awareness of the importance of their children attending regularly and being on time for school. More rigorous systems for following up pupils’ absence, checking lateness and reasons for taking children home before the end of the school day, are working well. As a result, pupils’ attendance rates have increased; and the number of pupils being late for school has reduced.

p.2

Main findings

Your school improvement plan more sharply focuses upon the key areas for improvement. The introduction of clearer measures of success is helping governors to hold senior leaders to greater account for the pace of improvement.

p.2

Main findings

You have continued to increase the amount of information given to parents and carers. This is helping them to support their child’s learning at home more effectively. However, information on the school’s website in relation to, disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs and the school’s use of the primary sport funding, is not up to date. Consequently, this does not meet statutory requirements. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority has provided effective support to the school. The school has received helpful advice relating to the recruitment of new staff as well as in drawing up clear plans to support their induction. Teachers new to the school have settled quickly because they are clear about the jobs they have been asked to do.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Nottingham.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion