Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Wendy Varney

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Wendy Varney

  • Postcode verified

    AL3 6EL

Page 3 of 4
Page 3 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 89% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedoutstandingclearvery higheffectiverigorouseffectivelyimproving
Criticismbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,147
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Jennifer Moles Headteacher Margaret Wix Primary School High Oaks St Albans AL3 6EL

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 25 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that the action plan shows clear dates and deadlines for monitoring the success criteria for all actions

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that teachers model the school’s handwriting policy at all times.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, three members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school action plan was evaluated and you took me on a tour of the school. You shared with me the results of this year’s Key Stage 2 national tests and I checked the school’s single central register. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com

p.1

Context

Two temporary teachers left the school at the end of the academic year and two teachers returned from maternity leave, part-time, in September. Three additional teachers joined the school in September, two of whom are newly qualified. The deputy headteacher and the Key Stage 2 leader now have non-class-based roles. One new governor has joined the school. You have had new outdoor playground equipment installed.

p.2

Main findings

The proportion of pupils who attained at least the expected Level 4 in the Key Stage 2 tests improved this year and was above the national average in all areas. The proportion of pupils attaining higher than the expected level was above the national average in all areas except writing. Some pupils achieved Level 6 in the spelling and grammar test for the first time. The school’s own data show that progress also improved this year and is now above the national average.

p.2

Main findings

The proportion of pupils who attained at least the expected Level 2 at the end of Key Stage 1 was below the national average this year, reflecting the very high mobility of this cohort. Fourteen pupils left and 17 joined the school during the academic year; some pupils had only been in school for a matter of weeks before they were assessed. The proportion of pupils who reached the higher levels was above average in reading, writing and mathematics. The proportion of Year 1 pupils who attained the expected level in the Phonics Screening Check rose by 20 percentage points this year and is now in line with the national average.

p.2

Main findings

The school’s action plan includes all the improvement points from the last full inspection and is clear, rigorous and focused. The plan includes explicit success criteria and has been reviewed and is up-to-date. You now need to ensure that dates and deadlines for monitoring all outcomes are added to the action plan. Governors have very good knowledge of the school and are holding you fully to account.

p.2

Main findings

A review of the way the school uses pupil premium funding was carried out by the local authority in June 2014 and concluded that it is using the grant well. This is confirmed by this year’s Key Stage 2 national test results that show that pupils eligible for the pupil premium attained in line with the national average in reading and mathematics. School data indicate that the attainment gap is narrowing in all year groups. However, these encouraging results have not made you complacent and this area remains a high focus. Two members of the senior leadership team have strategic responsibility for ensuring that pupil premium money is spent effectively and that targeted pupils achieve well. You have adjusted your staffing arrangements so that both members of staff are able to intervene directly to support teaching and work directly with pupils to accelerate learning. Assessment data is plentiful, analysed fully and used to ensure that pupils receive

p.2

Main findings

appropriate support and challenge. The achievement of pupils is tracked frequently and well so that progress is improving as a result. Governors have received training on understanding and interpreting assessment data and are now better able to ask challenging questions.

p.3

Main findings

Lesson observations have been used well to improve the quality of teaching. You have worked with a colleague from an outstanding local school to ensure the reliability of your judgements. You have also observed jointly with the school’s improvement partner. The school’s observation records show that the quality of teaching is now good or better. You focused your observations on the achievement of more-able pupils and this has helped to raise expectations. More-able pupils are included on teachers’ provision maps and there is now more focus on ensuring appropriate challenge for this group. The above average results at the higher levels in the Key Stage 2 national tests evidence the success of your actions. The school’s own data show that, with the exception of Year 2, half of more-able pupils are now making better than expected progress.

p.3

Main findings

A new marking policy has been implemented and is fully embedded throughout the school. You sensibly changed the timetable to ensure that pupils always have the chance to respond to marking before starting a new piece of work. I was able to see clearly that this is firmly embedded across the school and the impact it is having on moving children’s learning forward. Handwriting is better in some classes than in others; all teachers need to model the school’s style so that expectations are clear.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority provides good support and reviews the school’s performance regularly. Senior leaders now join you when you meet with the improvement partner. The school improvement partner confirms that the school takes full advantage of the opportunities that are offered but that you did not need support to write a suitable action plan. The improvement partner has worked with middle leaders and has carried out joint observations with you. A literacy advisor from the local authority has already provided training for staff and further sessions are planned.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire County Council.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion