Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jason Howard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jason Howard

  • Postcode verified

    LU7 2PA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh expectationseffectivelyclear
Criticismlacksfalling behindfall behindnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
794
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Kate Smith Headteacher Linslade Academy Trust Mentmore Road Linslade Leighton Buzzard LU7 2PA

p.1

Trust

Following my visit to your academy on 23 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Trust

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Trust

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to ensure that:

p.1

Trust

 feedback always makes clear how pupils can improve their work, and that teachers check they make the necessary changes  all pupils, including those who have special educational needs, receive any additional help they need quickly, and that leaders check the impact of it carefully  leaders, including governors, monitor the use, and impact, of pupil premium funding, and make this information known to parents. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders and held discussions with members of the governing body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I made brief visits to a number of lessons and looked at the way teachers give pupils feedback about their work. I evaluated the academy’s improvement plans and documents relating to the outcomes of monitoring activities and the impact of performance management.

p.2

Context

Since the previous inspection, a new deputy headteacher has joined the academy, and there have been changes to the teaching staff.

p.2

Main findings

You have established high expectations based, in large part, around a series of ‘non- negotiables’ that teachers must adhere to when they plan and deliver activities within the classroom. These include ensuring that pupils’ literacy and numeracy skills are developed within all subjects. Subject leaders have changed courses so that pupils can complete pieces of extended writing more regularly, and apply their mathematical knowledge when they complete work within different subject areas. Teachers assess pupils’ progress in English and mathematics regularly, and usually make clear how pupils can improve their work. Your monitoring indicates that guidance to pupils sometimes lacks precision, and that not all pupils make the changes suggested by their teachers. Leaders have not audited the quality of the texts that pupils use in different subjects.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are changing courses to reflect the requirements of the new national curriculum, and to ensure that the more-able find the tasks that they complete more demanding. New monitoring systems identify those pupils who are falling behind quickly; some teachers are not using this information to plan activities to help all to catch up. You have put plans in place to ensure teachers and learning assistants work effectively together to best support the learning of those pupils who have special educational needs.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders are involved in monitoring the quality of work in their respective areas; they support, and, where necessary, challenge their colleagues effectively when further improvement is needed. You are meeting with them regularly to check the impact of this work. Pastoral leaders are starting to work more closely with subject leaders to ensure pupils’ progress is monitored regularly, that those who fall behind receive additional help, and that the impact of this is checked carefully. These changes are too recent for their impact to be fully evident.

p.2

Main findings

Changes to the structure and membership of the governing body have increased the extent of governors’ awareness of the quality of teaching and the extent of pupil progress. Governor links with subject leaders have been strengthened, and focused visits take place. Additional training has helped governors gain a better understanding of data about pupil performance. An external review of the academy’s use of pupil premium funding has taken place, but governors have not yet received the report.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

You are receiving helpful support from the headteacher of a local school, and leaders are working with another school to check the accuracy of teachers’ assessment. Training provided by the local authority, and by other providers, for subject leaders, teachers and governors has been effective.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Bedfordshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion