Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Joan Hewitt

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Joan Hewitt

  • Postcode verified

    DN32 0AZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 50% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyrobusteffectivehigh expectationshigh qualitystrongambitiousskilled
Criticismweaknessesslowconcerningtoo manynot clearbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
966
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Dr Chris Rolph Headteacher Oasis Academy Wintringham Weelsby Avenue Grimsby DN32 0AZ

p.1

Wintringham, North East Lincolnshire

Following my visit to your academy on 16 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Wintringham, North East Lincolnshire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Wintringham, North East Lincolnshire

Senior leaders, members of the academy council and the sponsor are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

Wintringham, North East Lincolnshire

 embed new approaches to marking so that it is always of a consistently high quality  make robust checks on the quality of teaching and marking of supply teachers so that students’ progress does not slow if a teacher is absent  make sure teachers’ checks on the standards of students’ work and the progress they make are accurate in all subjects  make sure the most able students do not repeat learning they have already grasped  urgently recruit skilled teachers for the remaining few vacancies in English and mathematics.  clarify what success will look like at interim checks so that teachers, students and members of the academy council know exactly what leaders expect. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders, members of the academy council and the regional director for the academy’s sponsor. I spoke informally with students and midday supervisors. I evaluated the academy’s development plan and looked at the academy’s internal data. During the day, I toured the academy with the vice-principal and we made a series of brief visits to lessons and looked at students’ work.

p.2

Context

Since the academy’s last inspection, two assistant principals have left the academy. A new assistant principal has been recruited and a further two have been appointed from the existing staff. A new leader for science has been recruited and leaders for English and sport have been appointed from within the academy. A further eight teachers have joined the academy.

p.2

Main findings

You have worked effectively with the vice-principals to unpick some knotty staffing issues. This has taken quite some time and effort but it has been time well spent as the academy now has a full complement of senior and middle leaders. It is too soon to evaluate the effectiveness of these new teams. There remain a few vacancies in English and mathematics. You are working hard to recruit teachers of the right calibre.

p.2

Main findings

Results in the summer for Year 11 were disappointing and some of the improvements the academy had predicted did not come to fruition. This was largely due to significant turbulence in staffing, including the departure of senior staff. However, the results also revealed some concerning inaccuracies in teachers’ assessments of students’ work.

p.2

Main findings

The robust monitoring and evaluation by senior leaders, described in the previous inspection report, continues to provide the academy with a clear picture of the academy’s strengths and weaknesses. However, senior leaders have neglected to check the quality of teaching and marking by supply teachers. This has resulted in progress slowing for some classes. That said, the academy’s arrangement to manage teachers’ performance is strong. For example, senior leaders have provided tailored support for teachers when their performance has dipped below leaders’ high expectations.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers have responded to training well and now consistently make sure students understand what they are expected to learn by the end of each lesson. However, the progress staff have made in making sure all students are appropriately challenged by their work has been slower to get off the ground. There are still too many times when students do the same work at the same pace regardless of their ability or previous understanding. As a result, the most able students sit through explanations and are given work that they already understand.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers’ marking has been slow to improve but there are signs that the new approach to marking is starting to get the ball rolling. Leaders have taken the time to develop a robust policy and approach to marking. However, they have not insisted on teachers attending to the basics of marking regularly and helping students to understand how they can improve their work while the new policy was being developed.

p.3

Main findings

Senior leaders, including members of the academy council, recognise there is still a long journey ahead of them in providing a consistently good quality of education for students. The academy’s development plans are focused on the right priorities but they are not clear enough in highlighting what leaders expect to see at interim checks. While improvements have been slow to start, important appointments and the academy’s exacting monitoring have laid firm foundations for improvement.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The academy’s sponsor has provided sharp challenge to leaders and teachers and this is helping to raise expectations. Targets are suitably ambitious. Of particular note is the effective support the sponsor has provided the academy in dealing with difficult staffing issues, which are now largely resolved. Senior and middle leaders have improved their leadership skills through their access to the sponsor’s network meetings.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the academy council.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion