Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christopher Moodie

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christopher Moodie

  • Postcode verified

    CO15 6DZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositiveenjoyimprovingclearfeel safeconfidenteffectively
Criticismat riskpoorfalling behind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings438w+82
  • Leadership288w+2

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
723
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 32, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 36%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Jeff Brindle Headteacher Clacton County High School Walton Road Clacton-on-Sea CO15 6DZ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your academy on 15 July 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

School

The inspection was a monitoring inspection carried out in accordance with the no formal designation procedures and conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was carried out in response to two complaints made to Ofsted which raised serious concerns. The complaints were deemed to be qualifying complaints and Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector decided that an unannounced inspection of the school should take place to follow up the whole-school issues that were raised. The inspector sought to establish whether:

p.1

School

 senior leaders and the governing body are effective in monitoring and evaluating policy in relation to assessment and attendance  there is effective practice for behaviour management, including gathering and using information in order to promote improvement within the academy  safeguarding procedures meet statutory requirements.

p.1

Evidence

During the monitoring visit I held meetings with you, two vice-principals, the academy’s business manager and the examinations officer to discuss the quality of leadership and management. I made brief visits to several classes across the academy where I spoke with students about their learning and the standards of behavior within the academy. I also spoke with several teachers about the impact of academy leaders on the quality of education provided, and how assessment systems operate. In addition, I visited the Applied Learning Centre, which is an off-site learning base for a small number of students from the academy. I evaluated the Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T: 01216 799164 Direct E: tim.ogbourn@serco.com academy’s attendance, exclusion and behavior monitoring information and its

p.1

Evidence

safeguarding procedures and documentation.

p.2

Evidence

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.2

Evidence

The academy's safeguarding arrangements meet requirements.

p.2

Evidence

The quality of leadership and management is good.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The academy is a calm and orderly environment. Attendance is improving and is now in line with national averages for secondary schools. Students move calmly around the academy during transition times and this means that lessons get off to a prompt start. Behaviour is good in lessons and students report that disruptions to their learning are uncommon. Relationships between staff and students are positive and many students say that they enjoy coming to the academy. During break and lunch- times large numbers of students gather in the dining hall to eat and socialise in a relaxed and pleasant environment.

p.2

Behaviour and safety of pupils

The behaviour policy presents students with clear incentives for good behaviour and equally clear consequences for those who break the rules. Students state that teachers implement the policy with greater consistency than in the past, and this has helped to improve behaviour across the academy. Students report that they feel safe, and that they are confident in the academy’s systems for supporting them if they need help. Students in the Applied Learning Centre behave well and enjoy their learning.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Senior leaders monitor key areas of the academy’s work effectively. Behavioural incidents are logged and senior leaders identify any students who may be at risk of falling behind in their learning because of poor behaviour. Leaders act quickly to put in place interventions to support these students and have been successful in improving behaviour and attitudes. This careful monitoring has also resulted in a reduction in the proportions of students who receive sanctions such as detentions.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

The academy’s assessment policy is clear and is followed appropriately by staff, including examination invigilators.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Senior leaders and support staff monitor student attendance well. The academy employs an external organisation, on a part-time basis, to support their work in improving attendance rates. This includes meeting with parents and encouraging individual students to improve their attendance. Effective systems to safeguard students are in place. Records such as the single central register meet requirements. Senior staff are aware of the latest government guidance and are currently updating their level of training for safer recruitment. A training event is scheduled during the early part of the autumn term for all governors to update their awareness of safeguarding requirements. The academy’s procedures for child protection are also appropriate.

p.2

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

Teachers are positive about the academy’s leadership, and many express pride in their own involvement in its improvement in recent years. They point to improvements in the leadership of behaviour management and teaching and learning, linking these with recent improvements in students’ achievement.

p.3

The quality of leadership in and management of the school

I am copying this letter to the Director of Children’s Services for Essex, to the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion