Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jeremy Loukes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jeremy Loukes

  • Postcode verified

    NW6 5ST

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyoutstandingeffectiveengagingsupportiveconsistentaccurateclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings253w0
  • Leadership680w+84

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
933
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 26%Leadership 71%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Ms Virginia Fraher The Interim Headteacher St Mary's RC Primary School Canterbury Road London NW6 5ST

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of St Mary's RC Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 11 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of St Mary's RC Primary School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in March 2014.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and senior leaders, a group of middle leaders, the interim Chair of the Governing Body and representatives of the local authority. You gave me a short tour of the school during which we visited classrooms, the playground and communal areas. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plan were evaluated. I scrutinised the school’s record of recruitment checks and minutes of governing body meetings since the last inspection.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection, there have been a significant number of changes to the school’s staffing. An interim headteacher has been appointed and seven teachers new to the school started work at the beginning of the academic year. The Vice Chair is acting as interim Chair of the Governing Body until the governing body elections later this month. There have been some changes to the responsibilities of middle leaders. Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Email : suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

A period of substantial instability has hindered the school’s progress since the inspection. A high proportion of teaching staff left the school at the end of the summer term, including the headteacher. The interim headteacher, governors and local authority are now working closely together to bring about the improvements needed. Having completed a number of detailed reviews of the school’s practices, the local authority is now well placed to provide the right support. It is working with the school to clarify the roles and responsibilities of staff so that all members of the school community can be held to account.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

A review of governance arrangements has taken place, the recommendations of which have been embraced by governors. Following the inspection, governors have reflected on their roles and have identified key actions to enable them to be more effective. Governors are planning to embark on a series of structured visits to the school so that they can monitor the impact of the actions the school is taking. Governors are committed to undertaking further training in order to understand better how they can support and challenge leaders more effectively. Governing body meetings are now more regular, with a greater focus on pupils’ achievement. Governors are adopting a more proactive approach to engaging with school leaders.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority has implemented a range of supportive measures for the school. For example, several teachers have visited a local outstanding school to check that the judgements they make about pupils’ work are accurate. The local authority has established a Rapid Improvement Group that will evaluate the school’s progress. It is responsible for holding those supporting the school to account and will meet regularly to check whether progress is being made quickly enough. This group is led by a senior officer of the local authority. The local authority’s statement for action addresses each of the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. To sharpen the plan, further detail should be added to indicate the expected attainment of pupils at key points during the year. Proportions of pupils targeted to make more than expected progress should also be made clear. This will enable the Rapid

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Improvement Group to judge the rate of the school’s progress more effectively. When considering the quality of teaching, the plan should refer to the impact of teaching on pupils’ progress over time, rather than within individual lessons.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

A parent forum has been established, comprising parents of pupils in each year group. Although this is at an early stage, it is improving communication with parents and providing a vehicle for consultation.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The headteacher has established a new structure of meetings for leaders and staff so that consistent messages are received by everyone. Since the inspection, the behaviour policy has been reviewed so that all staff can apply a consistent approach to behaviour management. It is now everybody’s responsibility to uphold agreed expectations of behaviour. Although early in the term, the headteacher has already taken action to add further detail to the school’s action plan in the light of her observation and evaluation of the school’s work.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Leaders are increasingly aware of the need to evaluate the success of approaches to teaching so that adjustments can be made to respond to pupils’ needs. Pupils are assessed more regularly so that leaders can keep a closer eye on the progress they make. Teachers now look more closely at what pupils have achieved, adjusting plans for subsequent work in the light of their observations. Teachers now plan using a new format which allows them to be more precise when planning work for pupils of different abilities.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Brent and the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Westminster. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion