Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Sheena MacDonald
- Postcode verified
TN19 7PN
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 720
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Graham White Headteacher Hurst Green Church of England Primary School London Road Etchingham TN19 7PN
p.1
of England Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 10 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
of England Primary School
The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
of England Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you and the vice chair of governors. I had a telephone discussion with a representative of the local authority and a representative from the diocese attended the feedback at the end of the visit. You and I spent a short time in each of the classes and I had lunch with pupils. I also evaluated a number of documents including the school’s improvement plan and information about how well pupils are achieving in mathematics, writing and reading. We discussed the schools revised approach to curriculum planning, assessment and your systems for tracking behaviour and safeguarding. Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : Rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Context
Since my last visit two teachers have left the school and have been replaced. The amount of time teaching assistants work in the school has increased and a higher level teaching assistant has been appointed.
p.2
Main findings
The checks on pupils’ reading, writing and mathematics skills carried out at the end of the summer term, including the results of national tests, show welcome improvements. This is particularly the case in mathematics which had been identified as a weaker area at the time of the section 5 inspection. The results for Year 6 pupils who left last term were particularly pleasing. Year 2 pupils made considerable gains during the summer term which went some way to making up for slow progress earlier in the year. A more rigorous and accurate approach to tracking and checking on pupils’ achievement means that school leaders know the strengths and areas for further development. For example, your analysis shows that pupils’ skills in writing are weaker than reading and mathematics in all age groups. You have also introduced a more rigorous approach to recording, analysing and acting on the very few concerns, incidents of bullying and poor behaviour that occur.
p.2
Main findings
You have challenged underperformance and provided training and support to enable staff to improve where possible. Teaching assistants have received training to enable them to make a stronger contribution in their enhanced roles. Although our visits to classrooms were brief, it was pleasing to see that positive relationships have already been established and the vast majority of pupils throughout the school were eagerly involved in purposeful activities.
p.2
Main findings
The school’s self-evaluation document is very detailed and shows what actions have been taken over last year but it does not show sufficiently well what difference the actions made to pupils’ achievement. It would be useful for staff and governors to consider how well the school is doing and what evidence there is to support their judgements. The improvement plan is sharply focused on addressing the school’s relative weaknesses. You have revised the curriculum and assessment systems ahead of the national requirements and these changes are also included in the school’s plan. There are measurable milestones and targets so that everyone, including governors should be able to evaluate whether actions are resulting in improvements in outcomes for pupils.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school has benefitted from local authority support. This has been particularly valuable in ensuring that assessments are accurate and well used to drive improvement. Additional consultant support has varied in its effectiveness.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for East Sussex and the Diocese of Chichester.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion