Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michelle Parker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michelle Parker

  • Postcode verified

    CV1 2BA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 51% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyimprovinggood progressambitiouseffectiveconfidentlyconfidentconsistent
Criticismweaknessesmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
833
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Julie Roberts Headteacher Blue Coat Church of England School and Music College Terry Road Coventry CV1 2BA

p.1

England School and Music College

Following my visit to your academy on 15 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

England School and Music College

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in Febraury 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

England School and Music College

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

England School and Music College

 develop the ‘green stamp’ marking so that there is sufficient detail and challenge to enable the most-able students to consolidate and extend their learning and achieve at the highest level

p.1

England School and Music College

 include students as part of the academy’s monitoring of learning so they contribute to what helps them to learn most effectively.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with you, your senior leaders, the Chair and a member of the Governing Body, a member of Diocese, staff and students to Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The academy’s improvement plans were evaluated. I scrutinised a range of documents and visited five lessons.

p.1

Context

Two teachers have left the school and two new teachers have joined since the recent inspection. An additional librarian has joined the staff.

p.2

Main findings

The unvalidated examination results for summer 2014 for Year 11 and sixth form students indicate achievement is improving and the gap between students eligible for the pupil premium and non-pupil premium students is closing. This reflects the urgency and determination of your actions and that of your staff in tackling the weaknesses identified in the recent inspection.

p.2

Main findings

Students are making better progress. The introduction of seating plans that include students’ targets and starting points has increased the awareness of staff for the need for every student to make at least good progress based. The system used to track students’ progress has been refined. As a result teachers and teaching assistants are held to account more effectively for the progress of different groups of students, especially those eligible for pupil premium funding. In addition, improvements have been made to the information that parents receive about students’ progress. Feedback to students about their work is improving. The use of ‘green stamp’ marking is more consistent and helpful. Teachers monitor students’ understanding during lessons more frequently and adjust work in a timely fashion to match students’ needs. Students stated that they had better feedback on how to improve their work. However, most–able students stated that they needed more detailed

p.2

Main findings

feedback to help them confidently achieve a higher standard of work.

p.2

Main findings

Students are reading more frequently and widely. The accelerated reading groups first introduced into Year 7, and extended this year into Years 8 and 9, are improving students’ reading skills. The refurbishment of the library and its extended opening times is increasing its use. The introduction of an annual reading test for Key Stage 3 students identifies those students in need of extra support. Students stated how much more confident they were in reading in subjects other than English, especially when asked to read aloud.

p.2

Main findings

The academy’s improvement plan clearly focuses on the key issues identified in the recent inspection and has an ambitious timeframe for raising standards. The recommendations from the recent review of pupil premium funding have been included in the action plan. Staff members who spoke with Her Majesty’s Inspector had a clear understanding of their role and the actions being taken to make improvements. Governors have tightened their monitoring systems. They regularly observe learning and look at students’ work. The Chair of the Governing Body attends the recently introduced weekly teaching and learning briefings. The committee responsible for standards scrutinise progress data at every meeting and hold discussions with staff about any arising issues. Governors have also attended staff training sessions. Students are invited talk to governors about their work. However, opportunities are missed to involve students more formally in evaluating and thinking about learning.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The academy has a new school improvement partner this year, and also works closely with an external consultant. This provides the academy with an objectively critical view that is helping senior leaders to continue with their improvement work.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Coventry and the Diocese of Hereford.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion