Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Oct 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    TN34 2AA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 55% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivevery welleffectivelypositivelystrengthssuccessfullyimprovedclearly
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
939
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Charlie Lindsay Headteacher Sandown Primary School The Ridge Hastings TN34 2AA

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on Wednesday 10 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 accelerate pupils’ progress urgently in Year 6  ensure all teachers’ marking enables pupils to know immediately how to improve their work.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you and other senior leaders, including the deputy headteacher, the inclusion manager and your subject leaders for English and mathematics. I also met with a representative of the local authority, members of your governing body, including the Chair, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement action plans, governing body minutes and a recent headteacher’s report. We completed short visits to classrooms Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com together, during which we spoke to some pupils and staff and looked at work in pupils’ books.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection you have appointed a new leader for the Early Years Foundation Stage. You have also appointed four new teachers who started at the school in September. A number of newly appointed support staff provide speech and language support. The governing body has reconstituted.

p.2

Main findings

You and other leaders have responded effectively to the recommendations of the recent inspection report. Under your guidance, the senior leadership team has contributed to the school improvement plan, which shows clearly how the school plans to move forward. To enable governors to check progress the school is making, the timelines and monitoring, as set out in senior leader’s plans, need to be part of the main improvement plan too.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders for both the core and foundation subjects are implementing the new National Curriculum well. With external support from the local authority, they are developing the leadership skills they will need to improve teaching in their subjects.

p.2

Main findings

You have used a range of approaches to improve the quality of teaching, for example the effective use of video to enable teachers to review their own practice after getting feedback from school leaders. Similarly, your organisation of three teachers to work across two classes provides more effective teaching and learning support, and continuity for staff and pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Your governing body have responded positively to the recent inspection by commissioning an external review of governance and reconstituting themselves. They now have an accurate view of the strengths and weaknesses of the school.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders are improving teaching. During our short visits to classrooms we saw examples of teachers making better use of questioning to challenge pupils’ thinking. For example, in a Key Stage 1 lesson a teacher read an imaginary letter to the children and asked if they could work out who it might be from. Pupils were successfully challenged to use reasoning and deduction, and worked out it was from Paddington Bear. This led to the pupils working through problems to help Paddington use money to make different totals. We agreed that there is still more work to be done to ensure that teachers use every opportunity to stretch pupils’ thinking further. Expectations from all staff appeared high in all of the lessons that we saw. Pupils responded well to the demands made of them. Staff now follow the new marking policy more closely but their written feedback is not always clear enough to help pupils know what they need to do next. For example, in several of the books we

p.2

Main findings

looked through, feedback was often brief and sometimes only a single word. As we discussed, this would be difficult for pupils to use to help them improve their work.

p.3

Main findings

The improvements you have made to teaching are also beginning to have an impact on the achievement of pupils. Attainment in all areas continues to rise. In the 2014 Key Stage 1 assessments, pupils achieved in line with national averages. The progress made by pupils between Key Stage 1 and 2 improved and is now in line with national averages in all subjects apart from reading. There is still much more improvement needed, however, especially for the pupils who are currently in Year 6. It is also important that you continue to narrow the gap between those pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium, and those who are not.

p.3

Main findings

We saw pupils behaving very well in and around the school. They were keen to share their work with you and enjoyed greeting you using new French phrases they had recently learnt.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The school has made good use of external support, for example to complete a review of governance and to develop the role of subject leaders at the school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for East Sussex.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion