Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jason Howard
- Postcode verified
CO2 8NJ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Together with other senior colleagues, you are working effectively to bring about the necessary changes outlined within the academy’s ambitious, but realistic, improvement plans. p.2
- Governors are rigorous in holding academy leaders to account, and have made effective arrangements to monitor the impact of work towards the improvement plan objectives. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Recent poor GCSE results in some subjects reflect a legacy of ineffective teaching, the limited literacy skills of many students, and low expectations on the part of some teachers. p.2
- As a result, the incidence of low level disruption, though still too high, is declining, as is the frequency with which students are removed from class because of persistent poor behaviour. p.2
- reduce further the incidence of low-level disruption during lessons monitor the impact of work to improve the skills of those students who join the school with very low levels of literacy increase the attendance of students supported by the pupil premium. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 802
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Helena Boast Headteacher The Thomas Lord Audley School Monkwick Avenue Monkwick Colchester CO2 8NJ
p.1
Audley School
Following my visit to your academy on 11 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Audley School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Audley School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:
p.1
Audley School
reduce further the incidence of low-level disruption during lessons monitor the impact of work to improve the skills of those students who join the school with very low levels of literacy increase the attendance of students supported by the pupil premium.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders and teachers, and two members of the governing body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I made brief visits to a number of lessons, during which I spoke with students, and looked at the way teachers give students feedback about their work. I evaluated the academy’s improvement plans and documents relating to the outcomes of monitoring activities and the impact of performance management. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com
p.1
Context
Since the previous inspection, new appointments have been made to the teaching staff. There have been changes to subject leadership, and additional senior leadership appointments have been made. A number of teachers have left the academy.
p.2
Main findings
Together with other senior colleagues, you are working effectively to bring about the necessary changes outlined within the academy’s ambitious, but realistic, improvement plans. Recent poor GCSE results in some subjects reflect a legacy of ineffective teaching, the limited literacy skills of many students, and low expectations on the part of some teachers. You are uncompromising in pursuing improvements in each of these areas; senior and subject leaders are working effectively together to drive up standards in all subjects. Some difficult decisions have been taken where careful checks indicate that standards have not been high enough. These, together with the support given to all colleagues, have led to recent improvements in the quality of teaching. The early impact of this work is evident in the faster progress younger students are making.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers in all subjects are reinforcing the essentials of spelling, punctuation and grammar during lessons, and when they mark students’ work. They are showing students how to present their ideas and arguments effectively, and meet the demands different types of question place upon them, when writing at length. All teachers are reinforcing clear expectations regarding the presentation of students’ work. Subject leaders have adapted courses, so that students practise these skills regularly. Most now act on the detailed feedback they receive, and are making faster progress as a result. Those who join the school with very low reading ages are being given more intensive support, but the full impact of this recently-introduced initiative is not yet clear.
p.2
Main findings
Good behaviour in lessons is promoted through a new, and popular, reward system. As a result, the incidence of low level disruption, though still too high, is declining, as is the frequency with which students are removed from class because of persistent poor behaviour. Levels of attendance, overall, continue to rise because the academy is working effectively with most parents, but the attendance rates of those supported by the pupil premium remain below that of their peers.
p.2
Main findings
Governors are rigorous in holding academy leaders to account, and have made effective arrangements to monitor the impact of work towards the improvement plan objectives. The local authority is helping governors review the impact of pupil premium spending over the duration of this academic year.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
Local authority representatives have helped the academy’s leaders to check standards, and ensure that judgements about student progress and the quality of teaching are accurate. Subject leaders appreciate the opportunity to share ideas to improve teaching and learning, and raise achievement, with colleagues at a local secondary academy, and other schools that are part of the North East Essex Education Partnership.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Essex.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion