Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Sept 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jason Howard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jason Howard

  • Postcode verified

    CO2 8NJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−27Mixedmore positive than 12% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveambitiousrigorousclearaccurate
Criticismpoordisruptionineffectivelow expectationslowdeclininglimitednot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
802
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Helena Boast Headteacher The Thomas Lord Audley School Monkwick Avenue Monkwick Colchester CO2 8NJ

p.1

Audley School

Following my visit to your academy on 11 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Audley School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Audley School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

Audley School

 reduce further the incidence of low-level disruption during lessons  monitor the impact of work to improve the skills of those students who join the school with very low levels of literacy  increase the attendance of students supported by the pupil premium.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders and teachers, and two members of the governing body to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I made brief visits to a number of lessons, during which I spoke with students, and looked at the way teachers give students feedback about their work. I evaluated the academy’s improvement plans and documents relating to the outcomes of monitoring activities and the impact of performance management. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection, new appointments have been made to the teaching staff. There have been changes to subject leadership, and additional senior leadership appointments have been made. A number of teachers have left the academy.

p.2

Main findings

Together with other senior colleagues, you are working effectively to bring about the necessary changes outlined within the academy’s ambitious, but realistic, improvement plans. Recent poor GCSE results in some subjects reflect a legacy of ineffective teaching, the limited literacy skills of many students, and low expectations on the part of some teachers. You are uncompromising in pursuing improvements in each of these areas; senior and subject leaders are working effectively together to drive up standards in all subjects. Some difficult decisions have been taken where careful checks indicate that standards have not been high enough. These, together with the support given to all colleagues, have led to recent improvements in the quality of teaching. The early impact of this work is evident in the faster progress younger students are making.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers in all subjects are reinforcing the essentials of spelling, punctuation and grammar during lessons, and when they mark students’ work. They are showing students how to present their ideas and arguments effectively, and meet the demands different types of question place upon them, when writing at length. All teachers are reinforcing clear expectations regarding the presentation of students’ work. Subject leaders have adapted courses, so that students practise these skills regularly. Most now act on the detailed feedback they receive, and are making faster progress as a result. Those who join the school with very low reading ages are being given more intensive support, but the full impact of this recently-introduced initiative is not yet clear.

p.2

Main findings

Good behaviour in lessons is promoted through a new, and popular, reward system. As a result, the incidence of low level disruption, though still too high, is declining, as is the frequency with which students are removed from class because of persistent poor behaviour. Levels of attendance, overall, continue to rise because the academy is working effectively with most parents, but the attendance rates of those supported by the pupil premium remain below that of their peers.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are rigorous in holding academy leaders to account, and have made effective arrangements to monitor the impact of work towards the improvement plan objectives. The local authority is helping governors review the impact of pupil premium spending over the duration of this academic year.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Local authority representatives have helped the academy’s leaders to check standards, and ensure that judgements about student progress and the quality of teaching are accurate. Subject leaders appreciate the opportunity to share ideas to improve teaching and learning, and raise achievement, with colleagues at a local secondary academy, and other schools that are part of the North East Essex Education Partnership.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Essex.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion