Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Sept 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    BN22 9EE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivesuccessfullyconsistentlysuccessfulpositivelyrobustimproving
Criticismnot high expectationsweakertoo lownot alwaysinconsistentnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
932
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Raja Ali Headteacher Heron Park Primary Academy Dallington Road Hampden Park Eastbourne BN22 9EE

p.1

Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 12 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

Academy

 add more regular milestones that relate to pupil outcomes to the academy improvement plan  sharpen evaluations of the impact of interventions for pupils, in particular for those eligible for the pupil premium  increase rates of progress for pupils across the academy so that more reach age related expectations. Tribal Kings Orchard One Queen Street Bristol BS2 0HQ T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, the executive headteacher and your deputy headteacher to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I also met with your middle leaders, the chair of the Local Academy Board and the chief executive from Aurora Academy Trust. We visited classrooms, during which I spoke to some pupils and looked at some work in books. As well as analysing information about pupils’ outcomes, I evaluated the academy improvement action plans.

p.2

Main findings

Under your strong leadership, with effective support from the executive headteacher and deputy headteacher, the academy has come out of a long period of instability and is now well placed to improve. You have ensured that all classes now have a regular teacher and that weaker teaching is being tackled. Since the last inspection you have worked to increase leadership capacity at all levels. Middle leaders are now much more accountable for monitoring and improving teaching.

p.2

Main findings

Your school improvement plan clearly shows how you intend to improve the academy further and includes appropriate success criteria relating to pupil outcomes to measure its success. However, these milestones, being annual, are too infrequent. It is crucial that more frequent milestones are added to ensure you can amend your plans in a timely manner should they not continue to drive improvement.

p.2

Main findings

You are beginning to make much better use of information about the progress of pupils to decide where you need to focus the school’s efforts. You are clear that the achievement of pupils at the academy remains too low. However, you are not yet using this information to evaluate and improve the impact of interventions on individuals and groups of pupils. This is particularly important because of the large number of pupils you have who are eligible for pupil premium support.

p.2

Main findings

With support from the academy trust you have successfully reorganised the local academy board and have recruited new members with appropriate experience and expertise. This has already raised the board’s capacity to hold academy leaders to account. All members helpfully oversee specific areas of the academy’s work. Minutes from their meetings demonstrate that they are now giving much greater challenge to academy leaders.

p.2

Main findings

As we saw during our visits to classrooms, teaching is showing signs of improvement. Expectations across the academy are rising and pupils are responding well. We saw several lessons where work had been carefully tailored to the needs of pupils, because teachers are now making better use of information about what pupils know and what they need to do next. Teachers are also beginning to make better use of questioning to deepen and challenge pupils’ thinking. For example in a Year 5 mathematics lesson, the teacher encouraged the pupils to think carefully and logically by asking: ‘What do you think logically would go there?’ and ‘How would you know if you were right?’.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ achievement is starting to improve, but not as quickly as it needs to, and there is still more work to be done before teaching is likely to be judged as good. Some teaching seen was not up to your high expectations. The marking policy is being consistently used by teachers, but does not always help pupils to improve their work. There was evidence that some pupils are now getting opportunities to write for extended periods, but this remains inconsistent, along with the quality of teaching overall.

p.3

Main findings

As we discussed, pupils behave well at the academy and demonstrate good attitudes to their learning. Systems to encourage good behaviour are successful and pupils speak positively about how staff deal with issues when they arise. Safeguarding arrangements are robust.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The Aurora Academy Trust has provided strong guidance and support for the academy since the previous inspection. Academy leaders have made good use of this, for example through the use of collaborative action research projects to improve teaching. The trust has also been instrumental in reorganising the local academy board so that it is aligned with stronger practise elsewhere in the trust.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for East Sussex and the Academies Advisors Unit at the Department for Education.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion