Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Sept 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jason Howard

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jason Howard

  • Postcode verified

    SS15 5NX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+2Mixedmore positive than 25% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh expectationsaccuraterobustimprovedsecure
Criticismpoortoo lowdisruptiondeclinedtoo manybelownot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
816
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Jason Carey Headteacher The James Hornsby School Leinster Road Laindon SS15 5NX

p.1

School

Following my visit to your academy on 10 September 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

School

 clarify the targets and timescales within the improvement plan, so that those who are monitoring developments can check how far actions are leading to better outcomes for students  take every opportunity to further reinforce students’ literacy and numeracy skills in all subjects  ensure that recently-appointed teachers and leaders in mathematics and science accelerate the rate at which students make progress.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, other senior leaders and teachers, a group of students and a member of the governing body to discuss the actions taken Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com since the last inspection. I made brief visits to a number of lessons and looked at the way teachers give students feedback about their work. I evaluated the academy’s improvement plans and documents relating to the outcomes of monitoring activities and the impact of performance management.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection, new appointments have been made to the teaching staff, and there have been changes to subject and senior leadership. A number of teachers have left the academy. The roles and responsibilities of those who provide additional support to students with special educational needs have been changed.

p.2

Main findings

With the support of the Executive Headteacher and other senior colleagues, you have taken robust action to improve standards in key subject areas. Leaders make regular checks on the quality of teaching and the extent of student progress; difficult decisions have been made where standards have remained too low. The academy’s improvement plans are comprehensive, and explicit about the actions that are needed, and who is responsible for each. It is less clear who will monitor the impact of actions, and how, and how often they will do so. Very recent changes to the roles and responsibilities of those who support students with special educational needs have enabled these colleagues to work more closely with teachers, plan appropriate support, and establish its impact. Changes to the English curriculum, a forensic focus on the requirements of the final examinations, and careful monitoring of student progress helped secure a marked increase in the proportion of students who

p.2

Main findings

achieved at least a grade C in the subject at GCSE this summer.

p.2

Main findings

Recently-appointed subject leaders, including in science and mathematics, have high expectations and are implementing appropriate plans for improvement but too many students are working below age-related expectations because of a legacy of poor teaching. Recent changes have strengthened the capacity of senior leaders to provide support and challenge to subject leaders as they check standards and work to improve the quality of teaching. Teachers receive support that is helping them to make progress towards the demanding targets that they are set. Judgements on the quality of teaching are now more accurate because they are based on students’ progress and performance over time, as well as on the observation of lessons. The incidence of low-level disruption has declined as the quality of teaching has improved.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders and teachers are using accurate information on students’ starting points and progress to set more challenging targets. Students understand these, and what they need to do to make progress towards them. This is monitored carefully by College leaders who help plan additional support for those who need it. Some teachers do not help students to develop their literacy and numeracy skills well enough. Governors are continuing to hold academy leaders to account, and offer support and challenge. Regular governor visits help them to check the reports on all aspects of the academy’s work that are given by senior leaders.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Local authority representatives have helped to provide effective training so that leaders can make accurate judgements about the quality of teaching, assessment and feedback.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Essex.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion