Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Jonathan Palk
- Postcode verified
SP11 9RR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,016
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Michael Milner Principal The Wellington Academy Tidworth Road Ludgershall Wiltshire SP11 9RR
p.1
Academy
Following my visit to your school on 25 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Academy
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Academy
Senior leaders and sponsors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Academy
make sure subject leaders align their action to improve teaching and learning with the academy improvement plan ensure the training of subject leaders provides access to high quality educational research including Ofsted’s subject and survey reports identify, with the help of student leaders, how to follow up the anti-bullying programme.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you, the executive headteacher, your vice principals, the assistant principal for teaching and learning and the directors of English, mathematics and science. I also spoke with a National Leader of Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com Governance (NLG) and the Chair of the Governing Body. I made brief visits to classrooms to observe students at work and talked with a few students about behaviour in the academy. The school improvement plan and other documents relating to subject and governor’s action planning were evaluated. The school’s single central record and procedures for safe recruitment were scrutinised.
p.1
Context
At the time of the section 5 inspection, there were teaching vacancies in the science and mathematics departments. These have now been filled. A further round of staff restructuring is being undertaken.
p.2
Main findings
Your post-inspection action plan focuses sharply on the areas identified in the Ofsted section 5 inspection report. There is a strong link between this plan and the raising achievement plan for the students in Year 11, particularly in addressing the gaps in students’ basic literacy and numeracy skills. You have continued to work at getting the conditions right for learning by focusing on improving the quality of teaching so that, at a minimum, it is good across all subjects.
p.2
Main findings
A greater understanding of students’ previous attainment, their current achievement and how this compares to national progress measures is being used well to raise expectations of what students can achieve. You hold subject leaders accountable for ensuring that lessons promote ambitious targets for the students. This has been skilfully managed with vice principals overseeing the work of the subject leaders.
p.2
Main findings
Your involvement, and that of your vice principals, in reviewing the progress of students who are most at risk of underachieving sends a very clear signal to staff, students and parents about the importance you place on the high aspirations of the academy. The vice principals have a good knowledge of the steps core subject leaders are taking to improve teaching and learning. However, the three subject leaders I spoke with do not all share the same priorities for improving learning in lessons as those expressed in the school improvement plan. Not all are clear enough about what will secure good and outstanding learning in their subjects. These factors detract from the main teaching priorities identified in the school improvement plan.
p.2
Main findings
The assistant principal for teaching and learning has made a significant impact on spreading good and outstanding practice and provides determined support for those teachers whose teaching is not yet good. The approach taken has fired the determination of good teachers to become even better. Frequent visits to lessons, looking at students’ work and regular reviews of students’ performance has led to a greater consistency in lesson planning, marking and feedback to students. These actions are helping to speed up the rate that students make progress. While the impact of teaching on learners is still a mixed picture across the academy, teachers are confidently focusing on how well students are learning in their lessons. In this respect, teaching has turned a corner. The depth and quality of questions asked of students has improved. There are still lessons when the discussion and dialogue with students is not of a quality to secure students’ complete engagement
p.2
Main findings
Governors are drawing well upon outside support from a National Leader in Governance. They have moved quickly to clarify their roles and accountabilities and engage with the school leaders to support and challenge them to drive improvement across the academy. Governors are much better placed to evaluate for themselves the impact of the work of school leaders on students and staff.
p.3
Main findings
The procedures and policies for safeguarding boarding students have been reviewed and are now fit for purpose.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The collaboration from Wellington College is encouraging. The support of Wellington College staff for the training programme provides practical help to teachers wishing to improve their practice. The weekly Saturday school and Easter school give valuable opportunities for students who are close to achieving a good pass in both English and mathematics to have additional lessons. The visiting student programme between the college and the academy is successfully encouraging students to seek out more opportunities in the wider curriculum.
p.3
External support
Your vice principal is optimistic about the contribution of an anti-bullying programme, run by Humanitopia, on students’ moral and social development. The intentions are not in question, but the follow up to the sessions needs strengthening so that the primary messages, fully endorsed by students, are sustained.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, and the DfE Academies Advisers Unit and the sponsor, Wellington College.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion