Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Sept 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Brooker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Brooker

  • Postcode verified

    PE28 5TQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−50Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedaccurate
Criticismshortcomingslackslacknot yetabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings353w−20
  • Leadership333w−47

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
686
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 47%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Sarah Wilson Acting Principal Sawtry Community College Fen Lane Sawtry Huntingdon PE28 5TQ

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Sawtry Community College

Following my visit to your school on 21 July 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Sawtry Community College

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in June 2014.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with you, nominated senior leaders and two governor representatives, including the newly elected Vice Chair of the Governing Body. You took me on a tour of the school. I also checked the academy’s single central record.

p.1

Evidence

The academy development plan was evaluated. There is no separate proprietor’s action plan.

p.1

Context

Since the recent inspection, the Principal has resigned with immediate effect, as have the Chair and Vice Chair of the Governing Body. You have stepped up from Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799163 Direct email : lewis.mackie1@serco.com Deputy Principal to lead the academy, the Vice Principal is on long-term absence, and the other Deputy Principal is stepping down from his role in September. These changes have necessitated the restructuring of the leadership team on an interim basis. A significant number of other staff are leaving the academy at the end of term. Appointments, including some that are temporary, have filled all teacher vacancies for September.

p.1

Context

The academy is in dialogue with an academy sponsor to become part of its multi- academy trust. There remain three governor vacancies, but the composition and structure of the governing body will be reviewed once the academy’s status is finalised.

p.2

Context

On 23 June, the local authority conducted a review of the academy’s safeguarding arrangements. This was followed up with a return visit on 14 July. On 27 June, the Department for Education undertook a visit to review the academy’s performance, and, on 21 July, the Education Funding Agency started its investigation into the financial management of the academy.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy’s leadership has been stabilised by the establishment of a cohesive interim senior leadership team. The Acting Principal has galvanised staff and has worked quickly to draw up a comprehensive development plan. Safeguarding students is rightly seen as the top priority, and procedural shortcomings highlighted by the local authority audit are being addressed with suitable urgency.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

By comparison, the findings of the recent report came as a surprise to governors, who were unaware of their responsibilities and had neglected to hold the academy’s dysfunctional leadership to account. Communication with senior leaders and between governors has improved, so that the governing body is beginning to gain a more accurate picture of the academy’s predicament. However, the governing body has in the past been misinformed and has been negligent in holding the former Principal to account. Governors are in no position to provide strategic leadership for the academy because their own procedures for monitoring the academy’s work are entirely underdeveloped. Governors need considerable external support, including training, as a matter of urgency. The external review of governance, recommended in the recent inspection, has not yet been organised, neither has the external review of the use of pupil premium funding.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Although the academy’s development plan is comprehensive, it is unwieldy for those who have to implement it and review its progress. For example, the plan lacks the essential milestones and sharp success criteria that will enable governors to check that actions are on track. Procedures for monitoring progress and evaluating the impact of planned actions also lack clarity.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy’s development plan, which incorporates the proprietor’s statement of action, is not fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that the academy may appoint newly qualified teachers.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Cambridgeshire local authority. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion