Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Easebourne CofE Primary School

Inspected 9 Jul 2014 · published 8 Sept 2014 · URN 126003

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Gianni Bianchi (lead), Elizabeth Cole

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 Jul 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Elizabeth Cole, Gianni Bianchi

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    GU29 9AG

  • Name on report verified

    Easebourne Church of England Primary School

  • URN verified

    126003

Page 9 of 9
Page 9 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 16% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progressenjoyimprovedgood progresseffectivelyeffectivehighly effective
Criticismnot alwaysrequires improvementtoo fewinadequatenot yetinconsistentnot sufficientlyunsafe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings138w+61
  • What needs to improve2178w−7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,218
shorter than usual (typical 2806)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 71%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

School report Easebourne Church of England Primary School Wheelbarrow Castle, Easebourne, West Sussex, GU29 9AG

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because:

 Pupils do not always make good progress between Year 1 and Year 6.  Too few pupils make good progress, especially in reading and mathematics.  Teaching is still not good because teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve are sometimes too low.  The teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters make) is not taught consistently well enough. Reading is not yet given a high enough priority in the school.  Pupils, including the most able, are not always regularly given work that stretches them to do their best.  Pupils are not given enough opportunities to apply their mathematical skills and in order to deepen their understanding.  Marking is inconsistent. Pupils have too few opportunities in lessons to act on the guidance given by their teachers to improve their work.  In lessons that do not fully engage pupils, their behaviour sometimes disrupts the learning for others and rates of progress slow.  Senior leaders do not set teachers’ targets with

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because:

sufficient rigour to speed up the rate of school improvement.  The role of subject leaders has not developed quickly enough for them to have sufficient impact on improving teaching and learning.  The governing body recognises that achievement is not good enough and it does not hold school leaders fully accountable for raising standards at the school.

p.1

The school has the following strengths:

 Children’s learning gets off to a good start in the Early Years Foundation Stage.  Standards in writing are improving rapidly and it is promoted well in the school.  Pupils feel safe. The care and welfare of pupils is central to the school’s work.  Pupils enjoy coming to school and their attendance is above average and rising.  Pupils have good opportunities to participate in sporting, musical and artistic events.  Staff morale is high. They work well together and respond positively to change.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed learning in 16 lessons taught by eight teachers. Two lessons were observed jointly with the headteacher. Inspectors also looked closely at pupils’ work with subject leaders.  Inspectors talked with pupils and listened to some Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 pupils reading.  Meetings were held with staff, four members of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and the Diocese of Chichester .  Inspectors looked closely at school documentation, including minutes of meetings of the governing body, the school’s analysis of how well it is doing and its improvement plan. They reviewed documents relating to behaviour and safeguarding and the school’s data on pupils’ progress.  Inspectors took account of the 44 responses from parents and carers to the online questionnaire, Parent View. They also had informal conversations with some parents and carers at the end of the school day and considered three letters received from parents and carers.

p.2

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors took account of the 18 responses to the staff questionnaire provided by Ofsted.

p.2

Inspection team

Gianni Bianchi, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Elizabeth Cole Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Easebourne Church of England Primary School is smaller than average in size. There are seven classes from Reception to Year 6.  The proportion of pupils for whom the school receives the pupil premium, which is additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and children who are looked after, is well below the national average.  Nearly all pupils are White British with very few pupils who speak English as an additional language or come from minority ethnic backgrounds.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is above average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also above average.  The school meets the current floor standards, which set the government’s minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  The current headteacher is retiring at the end of this academic year and a new one has been

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching so that it is consistently good or outstanding by:  increasing teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve and always setting work that is hard enough for pupils, particularly the most able  eliminating all distractions and instances of poor behaviour during lessons to ensure that pupils are always fully absorbed in their learning  giving pupils more opportunities in lessons to act upon the advice given to them in their teachers’ marking so that they fully understand how to improve their work.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise achievement in reading and mathematics by ensuring that:  reading is given a higher priority and a wider range of reading materials is provided for pupils to choose from, thereby fully developing their love of reading  the quality of phonics teaching is consistently good across the school to support better rates of progress in reading  teachers plan more opportunities for pupils to apply their mathematical skills in a range of other subjects to deepen their understanding.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve leadership and management by:  increasing the rigour and precision of the targets set for teachers in order to improve the quality of teaching and raise pupils’ achievement more rapidly  developing the roles of subject leaders so that they can check and evaluate their subjects and accelerate rates of progress for all pupils  making sure the governing body fully challenges the senior leaders of the school to secure rapid improvements in standards.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Pupils in Years 1 to 6 do not make rapid enough progress from their starting points. This is because leaders do not always make sure that teaching is challenging enough to raise pupils’ achievement. The most able pupils are not always given work that stretches them to do their best and this limits their progress.  Over time, national tests have shown that by the end of Year 6, pupils’ progress is below that expected for their age, particularly in mathematics and reading.  The teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters make) is inconsistent. The proportion of current Year 1 pupils reaching the expected level in the phonics screening check is below the national average.  Reading is not given a high enough priority throughout the school. There are insufficient opportunities for pupils to read a wider variety of reading materials and enrich their enjoyment of reading. Some older pupils told inspectors that they would like more books to read.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Children enter the school with skills and knowledge typical for their age. When they leave the Reception class they are well prepared for Year 1. This is because the teaching meets their needs well.  In the 2013 national assessments, pupils in Year 2 and Year 6 attained standards that were broadly average and some reached the highest levels in writing and mathematics. Improvements in the quality of teaching and the school’s information on achievement show that current pupils are making faster rates of progress, particularly in writing. Current Year 6 pupils have made good progress from their starting points at the end of Key Stage 1 and are working at levels above those expected nationally in writing.  In this school, additional funding is used well to support individual pupils by providing extra support for those pupils who need it. Numbers are too small to enable comparisons with other pupils.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 In Years 1 to 6, the progress of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is closely scrutinized and shows that most now make good progress. Teaching assistants provide good support and skilfully question pupils to help them think through their learning and gain in confidence.  Since the previous inspection teachers have become more accountable for the progress pupils make. This ensures that everyone has an equal chance of success and is preparing them for secondary education. This includes the small number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and those who speak English as an additional language.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 The quality of teaching, especially in reading and mathematics, is variable between Reception and Year 6. It requires improvement because it has not resulted in sustained good progress for all pupils. Some teaching does not sufficiently motivate pupils’ interests. On these occasions, time is wasted and some pupils do not behave well. This slows their progress.  Generally most pupils enjoy learning and say ‘Teachers help us to make progress.’ Where teaching effectively stretches and challenges pupils over time they make better progress. For example in a Year 6 lesson where pupils were writing play scripts, it was clear to pupils what was expected from them and this helped them to be successful. This kind of practice does not happen enough in other year groups and some pupils told inspectors that their work was too easy.  Marking of pupils’ work has improved. Teachers celebrate pupils’ achievement and regularly

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

provide guidance on how to improve their work. However, they do not always make sure that pupils follow the good advice given so that they fully understand how to improve their work.  The work in pupils’ books clearly shows that basic skills are taught through all subjects. Staff training has helped teachers include writing skills in topic teaching. However, pupils are given too few opportunities to develop and apply their mathematical skills in other subjects.  Where pupils make best progress teachers are quick to notice when pupils find new skills, knowledge and understanding difficult and build in time for pupils to practise and reinforce their learning. For example, Year 4 pupils were given more time in a science lesson to develop their understanding of identification keys because the teacher’s good questioning skills showed that their learning was not yet secure.  There is some specialist teaching, for example, in French and music. As a result, pupils are given

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

expert knowledge in these subjects.  Classrooms are tidy. The quality of work on display is impressive and includes helpful advice of which pupils make good use.  The majority of parents and carers who expressed an opinion felt that their child is taught well and makes good progress.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils require improvement

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement. In lessons where pupils are not sufficiently challenged, behaviour dips and prevents others from learning and making the progress they should.  Pupils who spoke to inspectors said that sometimes behaviour in lessons was not good and that ‘pupils mess around’. They also said that their teachers deal with it well. Some parents, carers and staff shared this view that behaviour is not good.  In the playground, pupils play well together. Older pupils help younger pupils through a ‘play leader’ scheme.  Pupils are polite and well mannered. The relationships among pupils and between pupils and adults are good.  The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. Pupils told the inspector that they enjoy coming to school and feel safe at all times. This is because adults take good care of them.  Pupils say that bullying is rare and they are confident that teachers tackle it quickly and

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils require improvement

effectively when it does happen. Discrimination is not tolerated in any form.  Pupils are aware of the different types of bullying including how to keep themselves safe on the internet.  Assemblies give pupils time for reflection and to learn about safe and unsafe situations.  Attendance has improved and is above the national average. There have been no exclusions for the past three years.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 The leadership and management require improvement because they have not led to consistently good teaching or achievement over time. Improvements in writing across the school and in attendance indicate that the school has the capacity to further improve.  Since the previous inspection, checks on pupils’ progress and observations of lessons carried out by the senior leaders provide teachers with accurate feedback on their performance. However, the targets set for teachers to improve their performance are not always rigorous and precise enough to improve the quality of their work and raise pupils’ achievement more rapidly.  The school is developing the role of subject leaders. However, they still do not play a full part in improving the school, especially in checking and improving the quality of teaching in their subject areas. As a result pupils’ achievement is variable between subjects.  Pupils learn a good range of subjects, which develops their spiritual, moral, social and cultural

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

understanding well. The recently introduced Forest School is having a big impact on pupils’ spiritual development as they become more curious about the world around them. Through the topics they learn and assemblies, pupils have opportunities to explore and appreciate different faiths and religions. Trips, attendance at local musical and sporting events and after-school activities, such as fencing, enrich pupils’ learning and broaden their experiences.  The sports funding is used effectively to employ coaches to teach physical education and promote active engagement in sports. Early indications are that pupils’ participation in sport is increasing and the self-esteem of pupils who would otherwise not take part is improving.  The school has benefited from the local authority’s effective and valuable advice, support and challenge to support its drive to improve the quality of teaching and learning.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 The school has begun to work with its cluster of other primary schools. This is beginning to have a positive effect on improving the quality of teaching and learning, such as joint staff meetings to moderate pupils’ progress.  The school ensures that all statutory safeguarding requirements are fully met.  The governance of the school:  Governors bring a wealth of expertise and are committed to making Easebourne a good school. Since the previous inspection, the governing body has provided effective challenge but this was not always acted upon by senior leaders. They have recently carried out more regular visits and are working closely with staff to see for themselves the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement. They are fully aware that both require improvement and that they need to further challenge the senior leaders of the school to ensure rapid improvements in standards. Governors set challenging targets for the headteacher which are closely linked to

p.6

The leadership and management require improvement

school improvement. However, this year they have not rigorously checked this to evaluate their impact on pupils’ learning. They understand procedures for linking pay awards to the quality of teachers’ work and have a good understanding of the school’s finances.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 126003 Local authority West Sussex Inspection number 442478

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Voluntary controlled Age range of pupils 4−11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 194 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Geoff Coulson and Ann Marchand Headteacher Arthur Bain Date of previous school inspection 2−3 October 2012 Telephone number 01703 813266 Fax number 01730 817232 Email address head@easebourne.w-sussex.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion