Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Kings Ash Academy
Summary
Mark Anderson (lead), Alan Jones, Marian Marks
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
19 Jun 2014
- Inspectors verified
Alan Jones, Marian Marks, Mark Anderson
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
TQ3 3XA
- Name on report verified
Kings Ash Academy
- URN verified
138773
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- The headteacher has provided strong leadership and has been well supported by an effective management structure, incorporating senior leaders and three phase leaders who all have clearly allocated areas of responsibility. p.6
- A scrutiny of pupils’ books shows that pupils learn well and make consistently good progress. p.4
- These pupils are also making good progress through effective one-to-one support and small-group teaching in lessons. p.4
- Staff are enthusiastic and their good relationships with their pupils support the successful learning that takes place. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Teachers do not always keep a close check on pupils’ progress in lessons and pupils are not always moved on to more challenging tasks as quickly as possible. p.4
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The behaviour of the pupils outside of the classroom, especially on the playgrounds, is not good enough. p.1
- Pupils from different age groups do not always mix well together. p.1
- Some older pupils do not provide appropriate role models for the younger pupils. p.1
- Children in the Nursery and Reception classes do not make sufficient progress because there is not enough emphasis on acquiring basic skills in numbers, reading and writing. p.1
- The majority of pupils behave well in the classroom. p.1
- However, low level disruption occurs in a small number of lessons. p.1
- Relationships with parents are not yet strong or effective enough. p.1
- A significant number of parents have expressed concerns regarding pupils’ behaviour. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families6
“Relationships with parents are not yet strong or effective enough.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,435
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Kings Ash Academy Pimm Road, Paignton, Devon, TQ3 3XA
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
The behaviour of the pupils outside of the classroom, especially on the playgrounds, is not good enough. Pupils from different age groups do not always mix well together. Some older pupils do not provide appropriate role models for the younger pupils. Children in the Nursery and Reception classes do not make sufficient progress because there is not enough emphasis on acquiring basic skills in numbers, reading and writing. The majority of pupils behave well in the classroom. However, low level disruption occurs in a small number of lessons. Relationships with parents are not yet strong or effective enough. A significant number of parents have expressed concerns regarding pupils’ behaviour. The presentation of work in some year groups is not of a high enough standard.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The headteacher provides determined leadership. Her vision for the school is supported by staff and governors and is resulting in ongoing improvement. From Year 1 onwards pupils make good progress in all subjects and reach standards close to the national average. Good teaching means that all groups of pupils achieve well. Pupils supported by additional funding through the pupil premium achieve as well as their classmates. Attendance has improved and is now above national levels. The teaching and learning of phonics (the sounds that letters make) have improved. There are effective systems to check on pupils’ progress regularly. The teachers know all their pupils well and are aware of their individual needs and levels of ability.
p.1
Information about this inspection
All staff were seen teaching. The inspectors observed 27 lessons, eight of which were joint observations with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. A whole school assembly was also observed. Pupils from Years 2 and 3 were heard to read individually. Meetings were held with the Chair of the Governing Body and three other members, the academy improvement partner, senior staff, the special educational needs coordinator, subject leaders and groups of pupils. The inspection team took account of 11 submissions to the online survey, Parent View, and the academy’s own survey of parental opinion, as well as conversations with parents before and after school. The views of the 26 staff who completed the staff questionnaire were also taken into consideration. The inspectors also looked at a range of documentation including the academy’s own information about pupils’ achievement, the academy’s self-evaluation, safeguarding records and
p.2
Information about this inspection
procedures, and information relating to attendance and behaviour.
p.2
Inspection team
Mark Anderson, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Marian Marks Additional Inspector Alan Jones Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
King’s Ash Academy is larger than the average-sized primary school and is located near the centre of Paignton. Each year group has two classes. The majority of pupils come from a White British background. The proportion of pupils supported through the pupil premium is significantly above average. The pupil premium is additional funding for those pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those children who are looked after by the local authority. The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is well above average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also significantly above average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics.
p.3
Information about this school
The school has an on-site support unit. The school operates a daily breakfast club which is managed by the governing body and was included in this inspection. King’s Ash Academy converted to become an academy school in September 2012. When its predecessor school, King’s Ash Primary, was last inspected by Ofsted it was judged to be satisfactory.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching so that more is outstanding in order to enable more pupils to reach the highest possible achievement by making sure that: teachers are checking pupils’ progress carefully in lessons and using the information more effectively to move pupils on to more challenging work as quickly as possible pupils’ presentation of their work is neat and accurate in all subjects. Improve the standard of behaviour outside of the classroom and throughout the school day by: establishing higher expectations of behaviour that are applied and followed up consistently by all staff ensuring closer supervision during break times and lunch time develop closer relationships with parents and put in place higher expectations. Improve the level of achievement in the Early Years Foundation Stage by ensuring that pupils acquire a sound grasp of basic number, reading and writing skills.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Achievement is good throughout the school and the great majority of pupils make good progress in relation to their starting points. Standards of attainment have improved in the last two years and are now close to average in English and mathematics. The majority of children join the Nursery and Reception classes with skills and knowledge that are below those typical for their age. A significant number have low levels of personal and social development and speaking and listening skills. Children settle well. However, they do not make as much progress as expected in the Early Years Foundation Stage because there is not a strong enough focus on learning and acquiring the basic skills. By the end of Key Stage 1 the majority of pupils have made up for the relatively slow start in the Early Years Foundation Stage. This progress is maintained as they move through Key Stage 2. Pupils leave Year 6 having achieved standards in English and mathematics that are broadly in
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
line with national averages. Approximately two thirds of the pupils at King’s Ash are eligible for support from the pupil premium funding. These pupils are also making good progress through effective one-to-one support and small-group teaching in lessons. As a result, they are reaching standards comparable to similar pupils nationally. There are no gaps between the standards achieved by pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and those of other pupils. A significant proportion of pupils have special educational needs. Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress due to the quality of the challenge and support in place. The school operates a pastoral support provision, known as The Support Base, which provides good support for pupils with demanding behavioural needs. It ensures that they have the chance to make good progress, academically and socially. A large number of pupils join and leave King’s Ash in different year groups. However all pupils
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
are making good progress relative to their starting points, irrespective of when they join the school. This year an increasing proportion of current pupils are expected to achieve the higher Level 5 in English and mathematics. The school’s information shows that there is an increasing number of pupils working at levels above those expected for their age. This improvement is evidence of an increased level of challenge that has been provided for the most able pupils. Pupils’ grasp of phonics (the sounds letters make) in the Year 1 check has significantly improved and is stronger than in previous years when pupils were below average. Pupils have regular opportunities to read for a variety of purposes in lessons. Together with improvements in reading support throughout the school, this has resulted in improved standards in reading.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching is generally good and pupils respond well to their teachers’ expectations and interesting activities which enable them to make good progress. Staff are enthusiastic and their good relationships with their pupils support the successful learning that takes place. The headteacher has focused on improving teaching and has given clear direction to staff. Expectations have been raised and this has resulted in more pupils making faster progress and a greater proportion of good elements to teaching. A scrutiny of pupils’ books shows that pupils learn well and make consistently good progress. Teamwork is a strength of the school. Teachers and teaching assistants work well together. Teaching assistants make a valuable contribution to pupils’ learning, particularly for those who need extra help. They skilfully carry out clear roles and responsibilities. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage have access to well-resourced outdoor and indoor
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
areas. But, the teachers do not focus effectively enough on developing the children’s reading, writing and basic number skills. Opportunities to extend their learning are also sometimes missed when they are engaged in a wide range of learning activities. Planning is consistent across the whole school and supports pupils’ learning well. Teachers do not always keep a close check on pupils’ progress in lessons and pupils are not always moved on to more challenging tasks as quickly as possible. Both teachers and pupils appreciate that it is sometimes helpful to take ‘risks’ and that this often adds to their enjoyment and understanding in teaching and learning. Attitudes to learning are generally positive, although there is some minor disruptive behaviour in some lessons and year groups. Class teachers and senior leaders regularly check on pupils’ progress. If any pupil is not keeping up they are provided with appropriate support to help them close the gap. As a result, disabled
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
pupils and those with special educational needs make good progress, as do those pupils who are eligible for extra support from additional funding. Enthusiastic teachers make learning enjoyable for most pupils and use a range of resources, for example video clips to capture pupils’ interest and stimulate their imagination. This was observed in a Year 4 lesson in which pupils were working in pairs to develop a product which they were going to ‘pitch’ to the ‘Dragon’s Den’. There is now a greater focus on teaching pupils to read throughout the school. Daily teaching of phonics and guided reading activities for all age groups support the development of pupils’ reading skills and encourage a desire to read for pleasure. Teachers create attractive and stimulating learning environments. Classroom and corridor displays are eye-catching and of high quality, incorporating a great deal of the pupils’ work.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
The pupils develop good computing skills. They are given the opportunity to use information and communication technology regularly in a variety of subjects. Teachers’ marking across the school is of a good standard and explains what pupils need to do to improve their work, but the quality of presentation in some year groups could be improved.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils require improvement
The behaviour of the pupils requires improvement. Although behaviour has improved with new rewards and sanctions, it is still not good enough outside of the classroom, and particularly in the playgrounds. This is acknowledged in the school’s own checks on how well it is doing. In the majority of lessons pupils behave appropriately and are keen to learn. However, in some lessons and year groups there is minor disruption which has a negative impact on pupils’ learning. Relationships between staff and pupils are good overall, but relationships between pupils in some year groups and across the different age groups are not as positive. Not all of the older pupils look out for the younger pupils and they do not provide good role models. A significant number of parents who spoke to the inspectors, or who responded to the on line questionnaire, Parent View, consider that behaviour was not good outside of the classroom.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils require improvement
They thought that the school did not always deal successfully with bullying which recurred sometimes. The response of a number of parents to the school’s recent survey also reflected concerns relating to pupils’ behaviour. Outside of the classroom, a number of pupils do not show appropriate levels of respect and consideration for each other. Staff’s expectations of standards of behaviour are not consistently high enough. Pupils’ attendance has improved and is now above average. The school checks attendance regularly and there are effective strategies and rewards in place to encourage all pupils not to take any time off school. School’s records provide evidence that pupils’ conduct has shown signs of improvement over time, although it is not yet good. The school’s work to keep the pupils safe and secure is good. The pupils understand different types of bullying and understand how to keep themselves safe in a range of situations, including
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils require improvement
those related to e-safety. Pupils who have additional behavioural needs are well looked after. The Support Base provides an effective nurturing provision within the school and the extra care and support needed.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The headteacher has provided strong leadership and has been well supported by an effective management structure, incorporating senior leaders and three phase leaders who all have clearly allocated areas of responsibility. Since academy conversion, pupils’ progress and achievement have improved. The school accurately evaluates its performance and identifies which areas need to be improved. Staff are well motivated and supportive of each other. They demonstrate a shared sense of responsibility for, and commitment to, the school’s continued improvement. Governors are committed and supportive of the school and are working hard to improve their effectiveness and the rigour with which they challenge the school. Pupils’ progress is checked regularly each half term. Pupils falling behind are given the help they need to catch up. The school has effective systems in place for monitoring the quality of teaching. Teachers
p.6
The leadership and management are good
understand that they are accountable for their pupils’ progress and their performance targets are linked closely to pupils’ achievement. All staff who returned questionnaires feel proud to be at King’s Ash. They consider that they are well supported by the leadership, as well as being encouraged to develop their skills through appropriate professional development. The school makes effective use of additional funding (pupil premium) to provide small-group and one-to-one booster sessions. This allocation of the funding ensures that the large number of eligible pupils make good progress alongside their peers. Good links have been established with a range of partners and the local community, as well as schools within the Prospects Academic Trust. The school has also had appropriate support from the academy chain. Kings Ash’s commitment to equal opportunity is reflected in the similar standards and progress
p.6
The leadership and management are good
of pupils who are eligible for additional funding. Primary school sport funding is allocated to provide specialist sports coaching from external coaches, staff training and a wider range of sports activities and clubs. The school is closely monitoring the increase in pupil participation in sports activities. Although parents have expressed concerns regarding the standards of behaviour, the majority consider that their child is well taught and are pleased with their children’s progress. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is well catered for through an exciting and creative curriculum. For example, in the week prior to the inspection, the whole school was involved in a very successful Business Enterprise Week, which provided the pupils with a real insight into the world of commerce. The well-attended breakfast club offers a relaxed, well-supervised and positive start to the
p.6
The leadership and management are good
school day. The governance of the school: Governors have a sound understanding of the school’s strengths and areas in need of improvement. Governors have benefited from relevant training and have a good grasp of how well pupils at Kings Ash are achieving compared to pupils nationally. They have discussed and agreed how the pupil premium funding is allocated and have reviewed the impact of this spending on the progress of eligible pupils. They know how the additional sport funding has been spent and how it has improved pupils’ sporting opportunities and experiences. Governors are reasonably well informed about the quality of teaching and make sure that pay and promotion are linked to the impact of staff’s teaching on achievement. The school’s finances are managed well and closely audited. Governors check that all statutory safeguarding requirements are met and that all pupils are given equal opportunities.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 138773 Local authority Torbay Inspection number 440113
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Academy Converter Age range of pupils 4−11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 437 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Wendy Burridge Headteacher Tracey Jones Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01803 555657 Fax number NA Email address admin@kingsashacademy.org guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion