Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Sept 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    OX4 2QT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongimprovedpositiveclear
Criticismineffectivenot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
843
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr J Rubba Executive Headteacher St Francis Church of England Primary School Horspath Road Oxford OX4 2QT

p.1

England Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 16 July 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

England Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

England Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

England Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

England Primary School

 ensure leaders’ feedback to teachers after lesson observations fully reflects progress on the areas for improvement identified in previous observations.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, your deputy headteacher and middle leaders, governors and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. We went on a tour of the school visiting every class and talked to pupils. I evaluated a range of documentation including the school Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com improvement plan, information relating to the monitoring of teaching, information about pupils’ progress and records of governors’ meetings. With your deputy I looked at a selection of pupils’ books. A check was made of the single central record of staff vetting.

p.1

Context

The headteacher has very recently gone on maternity leave. You, a headteacher of a local school, have been appointed as executive headteacher until Christmas, working in the school four days a week. A new deputy headteacher joined in April. At the end of term three staff are leaving, to be replaced by three new staff, including an inclusion manager. There will be an additional Key Stage 2 class next term.

p.2

Main findings

The action plan focusses well on the areas for improvement. The actions are logical to bring about the required change. It is clear who is responsible for each action and the plan identifies small steps that can be checked on the way towards your longer term goals.

p.2

Main findings

There is evidence of pupils making better progress in all key stages, including in writing and mathematics which were highlighted in your inspection report. However, there remains much work to be done to make sure that all pupils are progressing well, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.

p.2

Main findings

The appointment of a new deputy headteacher has improved the capacity of the leadership team to move the school forward and improve teaching. The addition of yourself as executive headteacher is a sensible step to add to the school’s leadership capacity whilst the headteacher is on leave.

p.2

Main findings

Monitoring of teaching by senior leaders, along with training for all staff, is making a positive impact on the classrooms. For example, on our learning walk your deputy headteacher was able to point out the addition of helpful prompts in classrooms for pupils on questioning, and the record of staff training shows a good focus on using question in lessons. It is good to see that when lessons are observed by leaders, more careful attention is paid to the progress of groups of pupils in the lesson and over time, when evaluating the quality of teaching.

p.2

Main findings

I am pleased to see that subject leaders are beginning to play more of a role in the monitoring of teaching, through checking pupils’ work in books and analysing records of their progress over time. The deputy headteacher is providing a strong model of subject leadership. Senior leaders are taking effective steps to improve the quality of teaching and robustly tackling ineffective teaching. However, the feedback after lesson observations does not always reflect back fully enough the areas for improvement identified in previous lesson observations. This needs to be sharpened up if the pace of change in teaching is to accelerate.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are building well on the feedback from the external review to improve their work. When governors visit the school they are beginning to look more at how teaching is helping pupils to learn. Data is starting to be examined more closely by governors to help evaluate the impact of the school’s work, and of additional pupil premium funding.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority is providing effective input through contributions to the development plan, brokering support from you as executive headteacher and providing access to subject consultants. The right regularity of meetings to check the impact of these measures has been established.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Oxfordshire and the Diocese of Oxford.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion