Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Michelle Winter
- Postcode verified
SG5 2NZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Too few pupils made the progress they should from Key Stage 1 or reached the expected Level 4 in reading, writing and mathematics. p.2
- More needs to be done to ensure that these pupils have the skills they need for the next stage of their education. p.2
- Here, too, there needs to be more focus on the progress which groups of pupils make. p.2
- School leaders have set clearer expectations for teachers’ marking, and pupils receive clearer feedback about what they have done well and what needs to improve. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance10
“Senior leaders, including governors, are ambitious for the school.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 962
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Lisa Clayton Headteacher Oughton Primary and Nursery School Mattocke Road Hitchin SG5 2NZ
p.1
Nursery School
Following my visit to your school on 9 July 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Nursery School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, the inspector met with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plans were evaluated. The inspector visited classrooms with the headteacher to observe teaching and learning. The inspector also looked at records of monitoring activities and information about the progress pupils make and their attainment. The inspector scrutinised the record of safeguarding checks carried out on teachers and other staff.
p.1
Context
Since the section 5 inspection, one part time teacher has resigned from September 2014, another part time teacher's fixed term contract is coming to an end in August 2014. One teacher has reduced from full time to part-time and has resigned as of 31st August 2014. All teachers have been replaced for September 2014. The leader Serco Inspections 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs has been taken out of class and is contracted for three days per week to focus on this area. Five governors have resigned and have been replaced.
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Senior leaders, including governors, are ambitious for the school. They are clear about how weaknesses are going to be addressed; for instance, to improve the teaching of mathematics.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Because of higher expectations and staff training, pupils’ progress has recently improved. The school provides additional support for pupils in Years 5 and 6 to help them catch up. However, early indications from Year 6 assessments indicate that achievement is still too low, particularly in mathematics. Too few pupils made the progress they should from Key Stage 1 or reached the expected Level 4 in reading, writing and mathematics. In Year 5, as well, the school’s own assessments indicate that too few pupils are on track to attain Level 4 or Level 5 by the time they leave the school. More needs to be done to ensure that these pupils have the skills they need for the next stage of their education. There is a brighter picture in Years 2, 3 and 4, where achievement is improving and progress is better.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Elements of teaching have improved. Classrooms are well ordered and pupils are mainly focused in lessons. Behaviour is usually good, although the behaviour of a small minority of pupils causes concern. The school has systems in place to support these pupils. School leaders have set clearer expectations for teachers’ marking, and pupils receive clearer feedback about what they have done well and what needs to improve. The school has introduced new teaching methods in mathematics to address pupils’ needs, including the use of practical resources to help pupils calculate. The weakest teaching is being tackled, but not always with enough urgency.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
With the support of the local authority, school leaders monitor teaching and learning. Teachers receive helpful feedback about how to improve. However, leaders’ monitoring does not always fully consider the progress pupils make in their books or in lessons. Longer observations are followed up with regular drop-ins to lessons so that feedback to teachers is ongoing. Here, too, there needs to be more focus on the progress which groups of pupils make.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Regular meetings take place to monitor pupils’ progress and identify additional support to help some pupils catch up. However these reviews of progress do not always precisely identify the gaps in learning or set enough challenging short-term targets. Some pupils receive additional help in small groups but this supported is not yet evaluated for its impact, nor is the effectiveness of the support teaching assistants provide in improving pupils’ progress An external review of governance has taken place and there have been changes; for example, to how meetings are organised and recorded to help governors become more focused. Governors receive up-to-date information and ask some searching questions. They recognise where improvements have been made and are keen to improve their own effectiveness. Governors do not always challenge the achievement data they receive rigorously enough. Safeguarding checks on adults
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
working in the school are completed and recorded carefully and accurately.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority monitors the school’s progress and provides additional support to improve teaching and leadership; for example, of the provision for disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs. Its work with the school to take stock of progress in July 2014 was, in part, helpful. However, a scrutiny of pupils’ work did not analyse it well enough or provide enough guidance about how it can be improved.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The statement of action and school improvement plans are helpful documents and they generally link together well. However, some of the school’s attainment targets differ between documents. The local authority’s statement of action does not provide enough detail about how they will help governors to improve their effectiveness now that the review of governance has highlighted the areas for improvement.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion