Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Jul 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Aelwyn Pugh

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Aelwyn Pugh

  • Postcode verified

    CH64 6SW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearstrongeffectivestrengthsproudrobustknowledgeableprecise
Criticismnot good enoughrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
979
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
25 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Marjorie Downey Headteacher Parkgate Primary School Brooklands Road Parkgate Neston Cheshire CH64 6SW

p.1

School, Cheshire West and Chester

Following my visit to your school on 4 July 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Cheshire West and Chester

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Cheshire West and Chester

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School, Cheshire West and Chester

 extend the action plan so that it covers more than one year, includes precise targets and gives a clear indication of when, how and by whom progress towards those targets is to be measured.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, the deputy headteacher, six members of the Governing Body, a representative of the local authority, and a group of six pupils chosen at random from Year 6. As part of this meeting, I tested them CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566868 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: pnuttie@cfbt.com on their mental arithmetic skills. I also examined a selection of books from Key Stages 1 and 2 in order to assess the extent to which the new presentation policy is being reflected in pupils’ work.

p.1

Context

The context of the school remains very similar to the time of the inspection. However, in September, four of the eight teaching staff will be new to the school or their particular roles in the school.

p.2

Main findings

Despite your disappointment, you, the staff and the governors accept that the school requires improvement and are working closely together to tackle the areas for development identified in the inspection report.

p.2

Main findings

Since the inspection, you have drawn on the support of English and mathematics consultants to review current provision in those areas and to agree on actions for improvement. To date, the subject leaders for mathematics and English have visited schools recommend by the local authority where there is strong practice, for example in developing pupils’ skills in mental arithmetic and extended writing. They have produced helpful reports on the factors contributing to success in those schools and identified key changes needed in Parkgate. These reports have been shared with colleagues and used to develop new policies on handwriting and presentation, as well as on the relevant aspects of English and mathematics. You have also conducted interviews with pupils to identify the factors which help or hinder them in producing more extended pieces of writing.

p.2

Main findings

Together with the external consultants, you have visited classrooms to assess the quality of teaching and examined pupils’ books to see what impact it is having on learning. You have provided feedback to individual teachers and to the staff as a whole on the strengths of what you have seen and where there is the greatest need for improvement.

p.2

Main findings

The pupils to whom I spoke were very clear about the changes that have been made since the inspection. They said that they are now encouraged to write more and to make sure that their work is neatly presented. They welcomed the new ‘presentation stickers’. If their work is not good enough, they have to repeat it, more than once if necessary. They now draw up plans before starting to write and they all agreed that the new ‘proof reading code’ is working well. They also make more systematic use of dictionaries, than in the past, to check on the meaning and spelling of words. They said they enjoyed the written challenges in mathematics and were very proud to sing the praises of the boy who could complete 144 questions in five minutes ‘and get them all right’. It is clear, therefore, that you and you and your staff have not wasted any time in starting to tackle the areas for improvement identified in the last report. You have

p.2

Main findings

produced a short term action plan and a log to monitor its implementation. Your action plan now needs to be extended so that it gives a very clear idea of where you intend the school to be at the end of two years. It needs to include clear attainment targets for the end of the Early Years Foundation Stage, Year 1, Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2. Given that some of the year groups have underperformed in the past, there is a need to review the progress targets to reflect the fact that some pupils will need to make far more improvement than average if they are to achieve the standards expected for their age. The action plan would also benefit from having clear milestones so that, at regular intervals, you can assess how much progress has been made towards your stated goals and make the necessary adjustments in a timely way.

p.3

Main findings

The members of the Governing Body have supported you in taking robust action to tackle underperformance. They are knowledgeable, committed and take an active part in monitoring developments and holding the school to account, particularly through the Teaching and Learning Committee.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Since the inspection, you have made good use of the support from local authority officers or the consultants on whose service they have drawn.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Cheshire West and Chester.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion