Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 23 Jul 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    ME4 5UP

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedengagingcleareffectivelystronggood progresseffectiverobust
Criticismtoo lowweakermissednot improvednot effectivenot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings261w+13
  • Leadership872w+61

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,133
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 22%Leadership 75%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mrs A Allnut Headteacher Greenvale Infant School Symons Avenue Chatham ME4 5UP

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Greenvale Infant School

Following my visit to your school on 2 July 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Greenvale Infant School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, I met with you, members of the senior management team, the Chair and other members of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority. We visited classrooms together and saw the majority of classes, including the Nursery, at work, during which time I reviewed some of the pupils’ books. I looked at information provided by the school, including recent local authority advisers’ reports, and information about how well pupils have been learning. I evaluated the local authority’s statement of action and the school improvement plan.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, the deputy headteacher has left the school. There are two new assistant headteachers who, along with the inclusion manager, make up the senior leadership team. There is a new Chair of the Governing Body. The school has Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com reorganised how it teaches pupils with behavioural, emotional and social difficulties. These pupils are now taught with their peers in the main classrooms.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Since the inspection, you and other senior leaders have taken effective action to improve the school. For example, the building and outdoor areas used are now more engaging for pupils. Teaching is now much better focused on helping pupils to learn the key skills they need in English and mathematics. Your impact can also be seen in the improved achievement of pupils in all year groups. As you are fully aware, however, pupils’ attainment, although considerably improved, remains too low.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Children’s attainment in Reception has increased and is now in line with the national average. There has been a similar improvement in the number of pupils achieving the expected level in phonics (how letters link to their sounds) in Year 1. Pupils have also done much better in their end of Key Stage 1 assessments this year compared to last. However, they did not do as well as you would like in order to meet your rightly higher expectations. This was particularly so in writing. More pupils who are eligible for support through additional pupil premium funding are making similar or better progress than their peers, but there remains a significant gap between the numbers of these pupils reaching the expected levels compared to their peers. More pupils are now reaching the higher levels in English and mathematics.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The gains pupils are now making follow the improvements in teaching that you have led. You have set clear expectations for all teachers about the progress you want pupils to make over time. Weaker teaching is being effectively challenged and, commendably, you have taken robust action where teaching has not improved quickly enough. The school has made some progress in improving how well pupils are engaged in their learning. We saw some examples of where teachers had thought hard about how to interest their pupils. For example, the use of chocolate melting on pupils’ hands helped them form the language they would need to write chocolate-related poems. Pupils enjoyed learning through play in the wildlife area.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

We also agreed, however, that there is still more to be done to improve teaching. For example, practical approaches to teaching mathematics were missed, as you rightly pointed out in a lesson we observed together, resulting in pupils being less engaged than they should be. The work you have done to improve teaching has not been as effective in helping your children to write better, and this area should receive more attention.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You provide strong, energetic leadership and a clear sense of purpose. You have introduced well-organised and clear systems to monitor and improve the quality of teaching. The improvement plan is detailed and shows good organisation. Leaders regularly use information about how well pupils are doing to evaluate whether the plan is bringing about improvement. Your plan mainly focuses on how to improve learning in English and mathematics. Although this is very important, it is also vital that all other subjects are also developed, so these require additional attention.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The leadership team is well organised and developing well under your stewardship. You and your colleagues work effectively together and use each other’s skills well to bring improvement. For example, changes made to the provision for pupils with behavioural, emotional or social issues have paid dividends. It is good to see you seeking to develop middle leaders in charge of subjects. Again, the main focus of this has been in English and mathematics. It is important that you also develop leaders of other subjects to ensure depth and strength in the curriculum as a whole.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You and your senior leaders have considered the new National Curriculum and how you plan to assess pupils in the future. You are making good progress in how you will do this in English and mathematics, with learning based around ‘topics’. You are, however, much less clear about other subjects, and it is important you sharpen this as you seek to develop the whole curriculum to be deeper and more engaging. As you rightly pointed out, pupils engage with great enthusiasm and interest during the opportunities you give them to learn outside or when on educational visits.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following an external review, the governing body has improved its work. New governors with relevant skills have been recruited. Governors have recently taken part in useful training and have a better understanding of the school. For example, they know how the pupil premium grant is spent and what impact it has. They are also clearer about how they intend to hold the school to account in the future.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority has provided regular and appropriate support to the school since the previous inspection. Its statement of action is clear and links well with the school’s own development plan. Leaders at all levels have benefited from local authority support. I was pleased to see the local authority’s continuing commitment to support the school on its improvement journey.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection these judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Medway. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion