Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Catherine Anwar
- Postcode verified
HP19 9HP
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 987
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Miss Helen Emmett Acting Headteacher Thomas Hickman School Belgrave Road Aylesbury HP19 9HP
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Thomas Hickman School
Following my visit to your school on 27 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Thomas Hickman School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in March 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with you and the consultant headteacher, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Education for Buckinghamshire Learning Trust. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated. Other documentation such as the governing body external review report was scrutinised. With you, I visited several classrooms, talked to pupils and looked at their workbooks.
p.1
Context
Since the inspection the headteacher has left the school. You were the previous deputy headteacher and are now the acting headteacher. The local authority, contracted through Buckinghamshire Learning Trust, has deployed a consultant headteacher to work in the school for three and a half days a week. One teaching assistant and a reception teacher have left the school since the inspection. Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Email : suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The appointment of a highly effective consultant headteacher is providing considerable benefit to the school. Her support has enabled you to focus swiftly on the right things. Since the inspection you have worked with relentless determination to promote the rapid pace of change already evident in the school. With the consultant headteacher, you carried out a forensic analysis of all standards in the school. This led to the swift creation of effective new systems to support improvements in teaching and learning and to monitor their impact. Governors have supported your strategic approach to training: all professional development is now precisely tailored to individual teachers’ needs. Your approach has effectively harnessed the keenness of all staff to ensure that the school becomes good as quickly as it can: you reflect that staff are all ‘hungry to move forward’.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The leadership team has a new structure and leaders are much clearer about their responsibilities; all now play a significant part in raising standards. For example, intensive work on raising attendance through meetings with parents and carers and a new rewards system has resulted in steady improvements so that attendance is now in line with national levels.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
You have sensibly focused on improving the rate at which pupils make progress and raising teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve. Inspirational displays give clear examples of and celebrate the rapid gains that pupils have made. Pupils’ books show early improvements in presentation and handwriting, and pupils have increased pride in their work. The gains made by pupils in Year 6 are impressive. All pupils are now on track to make expected levels of progress in reading; almost all in writing and mathematics. More impressively, the proportion of Year 6 pupils making more than expected progress now appears significantly higher than the national level. This sharp rise in achievement is mirrored in Year 1 where over one fifth more pupils than last year have met expected standards in the phonics check. In Year 2, pupils have made accelerated progress and are already achieving much higher standards, particularly in mathematics. Attainment for pupils remains at slightly
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
lower than typical levels but it is improving quickly.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
There has been effective training for teachers in marking and feedback. In addition, pupils have been taught how best to respond to comments from teachers so that they can improve their work. This is already making a difference. You have also demonstrated a rigorous focus on teachers’ planning. Teachers plan more effectively than previously so that some are now able to challenge pupils of all abilities with appropriate work. This is starting to improve the quality of teaching; significantly more teaching is now good than in March. Your judgment of the quality of teaching is now better informed by standards of planning, feedback and marking, and by how much progress pupils make. An external review of governance has been carried out; however this lacked rigour. It did not link appropriately to the areas identified for improvement from the last inspection, or to the school improvement plan. Despite this, governors demonstrate
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
a more sharply informed grasp of standards in the school and make a keen contribution to the improvement planning process. The Chair of the Governing Body is assiduous in recruiting members with appropriate skills to the governing body. There are now close and helpful links with Buckinghamshire Learning Trust. A Rapid Improvement Group (RIG) has been set up: governors and senior leaders use these meetings to check the progress made by the school against the improvement plan. Governors have created a helpful action plan, but it does not yet identify the impact of their work sharply enough. Governors have a high degree of confidence in your leadership.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
You sensibly decided to integrate the school improvement plan with the local authority statement of action. This has ensured a thorough and robust document. It now forms the touchstone for all improvements and is effectively used to measure success.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority, through the Buckinghamshire Learning Trust, has offered very good support to the school, largely through the consultant headteacher. High levels of effective training, collaborative work and monitoring have made a real difference to the school in a short time.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Buckinghamshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion