Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

North Borough Junior School

Inspected 25 Jun 2014 · published 16 Jul 2014 · URN 118301

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Jun 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Gianni Bianchi, Maura Docherty, Sue Cox

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    ME14 2BP

  • Name on report verified

    North Borough Junior School

  • URN verified

    118301

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 13% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandinghighly effectivestrongimprovedhigh expectationseffectivemake good progress
Criticisminadequateweaknessesnot alwaysrequires improvementnot yetat riskseriousnot outstanding

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1308w+66
  • Leadership691w+24
  • What needs to improve110w+57

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,027
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 28%

Full report text

School report North Borough Junior School Peel Street, Maidstone, Kent, ME14 2BP

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  The school has tackled the weaknesses identified by the last inspection with success. Under highly effective leadership, the strong staff team has worked together to raise pupils’ achievement.  Most pupils, including those who speak English as an additional language, achieve well, particularly in reading and mathematics.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are supported well. They make good progress, like their peers.  Teaching is good and some is outstanding. Pupils, including the most able, learn well because the work they are set is usually challenging and teachers check pupils’ understanding regularly in lessons.  Pupils’ behaviour is consistently good across the whole school and often exemplary. Pupils are well cared for and feel safe.  Relationships within the school are excellent. Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is particularly strong.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Pupils learn well during most lessons because they fully engage in what they are doing and because the creative topics they study excite them.  The work of the governing body has improved since the last inspection. Governors now rigorously monitor pupils’ progress and provide excellent support and high levels of challenge.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 A few pupils do not do as well in writing as they do in reading and mathematics.  Pupils are not given enough opportunities to act upon the good, written feedback they are given in their books. They do not always fully understand how to improve their work.  Occasionally, the work set in subjects other than reading, writing and mathematics is too easy, particularly for the most able pupils.  Recently introduced checks on teaching and learning are not yet part of normal practice for subject and middle leaders.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors visited every class. They observed one assembly, 23 lessons or part lessons and pupils’ behaviour in the playground. Four lessons were observed jointly with the headteacher.  Discussions were held with pupils, three members of the governing body, the headteacher and other members of staff.  The inspectors observed many aspects of the school’s work, including the supervision and support for pupils who need extra help. They heard pupils read and examined pupils’ work in their exercise books and on classroom and corridor wall displays.  The inspectors looked at a number of documents, including plans for what pupils will learn in each subject, plans for the school’s future development, records of the school’s use of sports and pupil premium funding, the school’s arrangements for keeping pupils safe, pupils’ attendance records, minutes of governing body meetings, and records of how pupils’ learning is

p.2

Information about this inspection

tracked and the quality of teaching checked.  The views of parents and carers were taken into account through taking note of the 29 responses to the online Parent View survey.  Staff views were taken into consideration by looking at questionnaires completed by 20 staff members and through discussions with several members of staff.

p.2

Inspection team

Gianni Bianchi, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Maura Docherty Additional Inspector Sue Cox Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is an average-sized junior school. It has 11 classes, three in each of Years 3, 4 and 5 and two in Year 6.  Most pupils are White British, although the proportion of pupils who have minority ethnic backgrounds is above average.  The number of pupils who speak English as an additional language is well above average.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is well above average. The proportion of pupils supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is average.  The proportion of pupils for whom the school receives the pupil premium (additional funding for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and children who are looked after by the local authority) is above the national average. In 2013, almost half of the Year 6 pupils were eligible for the pupil premium.  The school meets the current floor standards, the government’s minimum expectations for

p.3

Information about this school

pupils’ attainment and progress.  A significant number of pupils join the school in year groups other than Year 3 or leave before Year 6.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching and raise pupils’ achievement so that both are outstanding by ensuring that:  pupils do as well in writing as they do in reading and mathematics  teachers’ marking always shows pupils what they have to do next  pupils are given more opportunities to act upon teachers’ feedback so that they fully understand how to improve their work  all pupils are as well challenged in all subjects as they are in reading and mathematics.  Give subject and other middle leaders full confidence to carry out checks on teaching and pupils’ achievement in the subjects and areas for which they are responsible.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils’ achievement has improved since the last inspection as a result of better teaching and school leaders’ high expectations.  Throughout the school, pupils achieve well. In 2013 national assessments, Year 6 pupils made excellent progress in reading and mathematics and good progress in writing. Equality of opportunity is at the heart of the school’s work and leaders know that more needs to be done to ensure pupils achieve as well in writing as they do in mathematics and reading.  Standards in mathematics are particularly high. This is because of the good range of experiences that pupils encounter, including challenging investigation activities. This helps pupils to develop logic and devise their own strategies for tackling thought-provoking problems.  Pupils are enthusiastic about reading. Pupils who read to the inspectors were fluent and expressive readers and demonstrated good understanding. They knew their challenging targets

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

and how to achieve them.  The work of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is carefully monitored. Teaching assistants provide a very good balance of guidance and support for these pupils and they gain considerable confidence in their ability as they move through the school. As a result, they make good progress.  Year 6 pupils eligible for additional funding did not get as good results as others in their year group in the 2013 end-of-year tests; they were about 16 months behind in both English and mathematics. However, once starting points are taken into account, these pupils made similar progress to their classmates. The additional funding is used to provide extra teaching and pastoral support for pupils who need it. School data and the work seen in pupils’ books by inspectors indicate that eligible pupils are now achieving as well as their classmates both academically and emotionally.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Their good achievement means that pupils are well prepared for secondary education. This includes the small number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and those who speak English as an additional language.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 The work seen by inspectors in pupils’ books, the school’s records about the quality of teaching and observations during the inspection showed that teaching is good.  Pupils like the work they are given to do because teachers choose exciting topics for them to study. Pupils learn well because teachers know a lot about the subjects they are teaching and ask probing questions of the pupils to check what they have learnt.  Teachers’ expectations of pupils are high and, when set more difficult work, pupils achieve as well as they can. In an effective Year 4 lesson, where pupils were learning to write complex sentences, the most able pupils were promptly moved on to a more challenging task and, as a result, made better progress. However, this level of challenge is not as consistent in writing as it is in reading and mathematics.  Pupils take responsibility for assessing their own work and progress alongside teachers. This

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

helps them to have a very clear understanding of how they are learning. This engagement was particularly effective in Year 6 lessons, where pupils were totally absorbed in their work and their determination to succeed was very evident. As a result, they made good progress.  The work in pupils’ mathematics books shows that pupils are given challenging work to do, which is the reason why they achieve so well. As one child simply put it, ‘I love maths, teachers challenge us to do our very best.’ Occasionally in other subjects, such as geography and history, the work set for the pupils, particularly the most able, is too easy and they do not do as well as they should.  Pupils’ books are regularly marked, with detailed comments from teachers that help pupils improve their work. However, they are not always given enough opportunities to respond to teachers’ suggestions and improve their work.  Pupils display great pride in their work across all the subjects, taking care over their handwriting

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

and presentation. All those spoken to by the inspectors praised the quality of teaching and said they enjoyed their lessons.  All parents and carers who offered an opinion considered that their children are taught well.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils have high expectations of their own behaviour and this contributes to their good achievement.  The school is welcoming and pupils’ behaviour in class and around school is very good. Pupils are considerate and courteous to each other, eager to learn and listen attentively to teachers’ instructions.  Pupils are very supportive of each other and relationships are strong. Older pupils help younger pupils at playtimes and in their work. For example, the most able Year 6 pupils help support younger children who find reading more of a challenge.  The management of pupils’ behaviour is effective. Pupils said that there is occasionally disruptive behaviour in lessons which stops them from learning, but considered their teachers to be very good at regaining pupils’ attention.  The behaviour of pupils is not outstanding because in some lessons, where pupils are not

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

sufficiently challenged, they begin to fidget, become less interested and their rates of progress slow.  The school’s work to promote the safety of pupils at the school is outstanding because pupils know how to keep themselves safe and feel very safe at school. Pupils are confident in lessons to share what they are doing with each other in an atmosphere free from discrimination and without fear of making a mistake.  Pupils understand different forms of bullying and know how to stay safe on the internet. Pupils told inspectors that bullying is rare and if it occurs their teachers will help them resolve it.  Almost all parents and carers who expressed an opinion considered their children to be safe, happy and well looked after.  Attendance is high and pupils enjoy coming to school.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The determination of the headteacher and other senior leaders to improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement since the previous inspection has paid dividends, demonstrating the school’s capacity for further improvement.  Teachers know that they are accountable and there are good systems in place to keep track of pupils’ progress, particularly for groups of pupils who may not be doing as well as they should. Any extra support that is provided is frequently evaluated to check that it is making a difference.  Senior leaders regularly check the quality of teaching, focusing on how well it enables pupils to learn. They give teachers clear feedback so that they know how to improve and make sure training is available where it is needed.  Subject and other middle leaders are developing their confidence in the subjects and areas for which they are responsible. Senior leaders know that more work is needed to develop the roles

p.5

The leadership and management are good

of middle leaders so that they are fully involved in carrying out checks on learning and raising standards.  Pupils enjoy the topics they experience and their ‘creative curriculum’ books show that they have many opportunities to apply reading, writing and mathematical skills in other subjects. They are curious and ask thoughtful questions to find out more about what they are studying. The subjects they learn are supported with trips and visits and a good range of additional activities and clubs.  Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is excellent and it promotes the school’s values. Pupils work cooperatively and support each other in their work. They have opportunities to take on responsibilities; for example, Year 6 pupils are very proud to be prefects.  The new primary sport funding is used primarily to employ sports coaches who promote pupils’ active engagement in sports. Pupils’ participation in physical activity has increased and leaders

p.5

The leadership and management are good

are seeing improvements in the self-esteem of pupils at risk of not doing well.  The school ensures that all statutory safeguarding requirements are met.  The local authority has provided a high level of support since the previous inspection and this has helped improve the quality of teaching. The school is part of a consortium of nine local schools which share expertise and resources effectively.  The governance of the school:  The work of the governing body has improved since the last inspection. Governors have received training about school data and now have a good understanding about pupils’ achievement and how it compares with similar schools nationally. As a result, they are confident in challenging leaders about the provision and results that need to be improved. Governors monitor the quality of teaching and set challenging targets for the headteacher. They check that teachers are given the support they need to improve and are properly

p.6

The leadership and management are good

rewarded for good performance. Governors scrutinise school finances carefully, including the use and effectiveness of additional funding. Their impact on the school’s improvement is good.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 118301 Local authority Kent Inspection number 442464

p.8

School details

Type of school Junior School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 263 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Neil Sime Headteacher Christine Marshall Date of previous school inspection 14–15 November 2012 Telephone number 01622 754708 Email address CMarshall@north-borough.kent.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion